During a meeting of the US Senate Committee on Foreign Relations on Feb. 15, US Senator Marco Rubio asked US Acting Assistant Secretary of State for East Asian and Pacific Affairs Susan Thornton about the disappearance of the Republic of China’s (ROC) flag from the Bureau of East Asian and Pacific Affairs’ new Web site. Thornton said: “We don’t recognize, of course, Taiwan as an independent country and we don’t recognize the flag of the ROC as a country where we have official relations. Our policy is to not display the flag of the ROC on US official government Web sites.”
Taiwan’s pan-blue media picked up on the story and interpreted the flag’s removal as evidence that the US-Taiwan relationship is degenerating under President Tsai Ing-wen’s (蔡英文) administration. This is not the case: The correct explanation is that US discourse on Taiwan is becoming clearer.
On Jan. 1, 1979, the US broke formal diplomatic ties with the ROC. Since the US no longer recognizes the ROC, the flag that represents the ROC should be removed from all US government Web sites.
To this day, the ROC claims sovereignty over China, Mongolia and Taiwan. Therefore, if the ROC flag were to remain on US government Web sites, visitors would be left with the impression that the US acknowledges Taiwan to be part of China, as represented by the ROC.
US-Taiwan relations began when the US in 1979 switched its diplomatic recognition from the ROC to the People’s Republic of China (PRC). The US’ Taiwan Relations Act has been the basis of this relationship.
The act is a piece of domestic US legislation, but what many observers outside of the US do not realize is that the cornerstone of the act is the 1952 Treaty of San Francisco. The treaty does not treat Taiwan as a part of China, but it does not state to which country Taiwan — then called “Formosa” — should be returned, simply calling on Japan to relinquish its claim of sovereignty.
Since Taiwan does not belong to China, Taiwan is not a matter of China’s “internal affairs,” as Beijing likes to claim. Neither does it encroach on China’s sovereignty. Based on the peace treaty, the US has a right to speak and make decisions on the matter.
Following the switch of diplomatic recognition, US discourse on Taiwan was at first rather vague, because the act was drafted in such a way as to deliberately avoid the question of Taiwan’s sovereign status.
Furthermore, as a condition of opening diplomatic relations with China, the US had to acknowledge China’s position that “Taiwan is a part of China,” although it remains unclear whether the US actually did so.
In March 2007, then-president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) applied for the nation to become a UN member state under the name “Taiwan.”
However, then-UN secretary-general Ban Ki-moon sparked a dispute when he rejected Chen’s application based on UN General Assembly Resolution 2758, which, according to Ban, established that Taiwan was part of China.
Various nations, including the US, Japan, Canada, Australia and New Zealand, raised objections, and under pressure from the US government, Ban finally admitted that he had made a mistake and agreed that the UN would never again use the phrase “Taiwan is part of China.”
This had the result of further clarifying the US-Taiwan and US-China relationships, but it also strengthened the legal foundation of the act.
There is now clear blue water between the US’ “one China” policy and China’s “one China” principle. Washington has crowned its “one China” policy as “our ‘one China’ policy,” with this gradually becoming common parlance among US officials when discussing and making statements about Taiwan and China.
On Feb. 9 last year, US President Donald Trump had a 45-minute telephone conversation with Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平). According to the official White House transcript, “President Trump agreed, at the request of President Xi, to honor our ‘one China’ policy.” The US’ official position that “Taiwan is not part of China” was made even clearer.
As such, the continued appearance of the ROC flag — which represents China, Mongolia and Taiwan — on US government Web sites has become a contradiction and is illogical. This is why it was correct of Washington to remove the flag from the bureau’s Web site.
US discourse on Taiwan is becoming clearer: Taiwan is just Taiwan. It is not part of China, and it is even less a part of the ROC’s territorial construct of China, Mongolia and Taiwan.
Huang Tien-lin is a national policy adviser and former managing director and chairman of First Commercial Bank.
Translated by Edward Jones
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
The past few months have seen tremendous strides in India’s journey to develop a vibrant semiconductor and electronics ecosystem. The nation’s established prowess in information technology (IT) has earned it much-needed revenue and prestige across the globe. Now, through the convergence of engineering talent, supportive government policies, an expanding market and technologically adaptive entrepreneurship, India is striving to become part of global electronics and semiconductor supply chains. Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Vision of “Make in India” and “Design in India” has been the guiding force behind the government’s incentive schemes that span skilling, design, fabrication, assembly, testing and packaging, and
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.