The Philippines on Thursday announced a proposal to work with China on resource exploration and extraction in the contested South China Sea.
Philippine President Rodrigo Duterte appears to have drunk the Kool-Aid, describing the proposal as akin to “co-ownership” of contested areas. Most foreign-relations arrangements involve making concessions, but to believe that China would concede to sharing sovereignty of what it sees as its own territory is nothing short of delusional.
China’s foreign-relations strategy is to extend its political influence through economic incentives made to political and economic world leaders. It has always done this domestically by providing development opportunities and access to its expansive market. Internationally, it has been doing this through assistance with infrastructure development.
Helping the Philippines with its energy needs will translate into China driving a rift between the Philippines and its ally the US, which, in turn, will translate into US naval ships being denied access to ports in the Philippines. This would be helpful to China in its long-term strategy of pushing the US out of the South China Sea, where the US has said it would continue to conduct freedom-of-navigation exercises.
Duterte has said the arrangement is preferable to the “massacre” of Philippine troops in a war against China, but it also equates to the neutering of the Philippines’ own territorial claims in the area, and more or less enslaves the nation politically for short-term economic gain. China will dictate the terms of all resource extraction in the area and not hesitate to drive the Philippines out once it has achieved its aims.
China’s soft power strategy has been playing out similarly in cross-strait relations where Beijing has been providing economic incentives to underemployed and low-paid Taiwanese graduates and businesspeople in an attempt to influence opinion regarding Taiwan’s sovereignty.
China’s Taiwan Affairs Office on Wednesday announced 31 incentives and economic benefits for Taiwanese businesses, civic groups, cultural workers and artists in China, which would allow Taiwanese to enjoy “national treatment” in China.
Former vice president Annette Lu (呂秀蓮) said the incentives were “a soft unification strategy more powerful than military means.”
This is a soft power strategy that China is unleashing on an international scale.
In January, Delta Airlines was made to apologize for listing Taiwan and Tibet as countries, and last month Mercedes-Benz issued an apology over a complaint from the Chinese government concerning its use of a quote from the Dalai Lama in a company-issued Instagram post, as Beijing views the exiled spiritual leader of Tibet as a dangerous separatist.
Even Apple, whose famous 1984 TV ad presented its computing platform as the alternative to an Orwellian dystopia, has bowed to China’s outrageous demands, providing the Chinese government with access to Chinese users’ iCloud storage accounts.
In an opinion piece published on Wednesday on the Washington Post Web site, writer Charles Lane said the US’ initial support for China was meant not only as a bulwark against Russia, but was also due to a US belief that Beijing would eventually adopt a free-market system and offer free elections.
US businesses at the time rode this wave of optimism, benefiting from the cheap labor that China provided, only to arrive at a backlash over job losses to China and the subsequent election of US President Donald Trump, Lane said.
Surviving the rise of China will depend on political and economic leaders breaking the cycle of overlooking long-term harm in favor of short-term gains.
China needs international trade as much as the world needs China, and doing business with China should not necessitate making political or human rights concessions.
Could Asia be on the verge of a new wave of nuclear proliferation? A look back at the early history of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), which recently celebrated its 75th anniversary, illuminates some reasons for concern in the Indo-Pacific today. US Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin recently described NATO as “the most powerful and successful alliance in history,” but the organization’s early years were not without challenges. At its inception, the signing of the North Atlantic Treaty marked a sea change in American strategic thinking. The United States had been intent on withdrawing from Europe in the years following
My wife and I spent the week in the interior of Taiwan where Shuyuan spent her childhood. In that town there is a street that functions as an open farmer’s market. Walk along that street, as Shuyuan did yesterday, and it is next to impossible to come home empty-handed. Some mangoes that looked vaguely like others we had seen around here ended up on our table. Shuyuan told how she had bought them from a little old farmer woman from the countryside who said the mangoes were from a very old tree she had on her property. The big surprise
The issue of China’s overcapacity has drawn greater global attention recently, with US Secretary of the Treasury Janet Yellen urging Beijing to address its excess production in key industries during her visit to China last week. Meanwhile in Brussels, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen last week said that Europe must have a tough talk with China on its perceived overcapacity and unfair trade practices. The remarks by Yellen and Von der Leyen come as China’s economy is undergoing a painful transition. Beijing is trying to steer the world’s second-largest economy out of a COVID-19 slump, the property crisis and
As former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) wrapped up his visit to the People’s Republic of China, he received his share of attention. Certainly, the trip must be seen within the full context of Ma’s life, that is, his eight-year presidency, the Sunflower movement and his failed Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement, as well as his eight years as Taipei mayor with its posturing, accusations of money laundering, and ups and downs. Through all that, basic questions stand out: “What drives Ma? What is his end game?” Having observed and commented on Ma for decades, it is all ironically reminiscent of former US president Harry