The Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics (DGBAS) on Feb. 13 adjusted its forecast for GDP growth this year to 2.42 percent, up 0.13 percent from its earlier projection of 2.29 percent.
“I am optimistic that the economy will continue its current course of stable expansion,” DGBAS Minister Chu Tzer-ming (朱澤民) said.
In the final two quarters of former president Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) final year in office, the fourth quarter of 2015 and the first quarter of 2016, Taiwan’s GDP shrank 0.79 percent and 0.23 percent respectively.
When President Tsai Ing-wen’s (蔡英文) administration took office, it put an end to Ma’s “one China market” policy. Since then, Taiwan’s GDP has stopped shrinking and started growing.
Last year it grew by 2.86 percent, which is a remarkable political achievement for the Tsai administration.
However, the public expects more. Although opinion polls show that the satisfaction rate with the Tsai administration has bounced back to 50.4 percent, it still falls short of the ideal level.
One point that people find puzzling is GDP growth. Considering that the economy grew by 2.86 percent last year and the stock market has been thriving, people wonder why the economy is only expected to grow by 2.41 percent this year.
Does it mean that low growth rates have become the normal state of affairs? If so, why? Are there any solutions to get the nation out of this low-growth rut?
This is a question that the government needs to carefully consider.
One reason for Taiwan’s low growth rates can be seen from the controversy erupted ahead of the Lunar New Year concerning China-based Taiwanese businesspeople and students returning home for the holiday. This shows that China’s policies of using economic means to promote unification, while impoverishing Taiwan, are having an effect.
Nobody knows how many Taiwanese businesspeople and students wanted to return from China to Taiwan for the holiday. On Jan. 4, China unilaterally activated the northbound M503 flight route.
Taiwan’s protests over this move led to two Chinese airlines — China Eastern Airlines and XiamenAir — canceling 176 extra flights that they had planned for the holiday period. These cancelations reportedly affected 50,000 people and made tickets scarce and expensive.
Given that an additional 489 flights were not canceled, and assuming that there are about 150 passengers per flight, the total number of passengers carried on the regular and additional holiday flights would have been about 160,000.
If Taiwanese businesspeople who were flying to Taiwan on domestic airlines were added with those who traveled via the “small three links,” the total exceeds 300,000 people.
Not all Taiwanese businesspeople and students returned from China for the holiday, and some Taiwanese managers stayed in China to work in the period. Adding these figures together, to say that there are 1 million Taiwanese businesspeople living long-term in China would be a conservative estimate.
China has for several years been pursuing a strategy of wooing small and medium-sized Taiwanese enterprises, medium and low-income earners, residents of central and southern Taiwan as well as young people.
Last year, this strategy was updated to focus on the younger generation and to take a grassroots approach. These policies have caused the numbers of Taiwanese businesspeople and students living long-term in China to increase year-on-year. As a result, these people keep shifting their consumption from Taiwan to China, along with between 1 percent and 2 percent of Taiwan’s economic growth.
This is the main reason that since 2008 it has been impossible to make Taiwan’s domestic consumption grow faster.
The knock-on effect of Taiwan’s sluggish consumption is insufficient investment. In view of Taiwan’s depressed consumption and high expectations of the Chinese market, investors have shifted their new investments to China. Nearly 80 percent of companies listed on Taiwan’s stock exchange have established manufacturing centers in China, which show how serious this is, and where listed companies go, smaller firms are sure to follow.
The fuss about China-based businesspeople and students returning to Taiwan during holidays shows that Taiwan’s economy has sunk into a vicious cycle. The first step in this cycle is the attractions that China offers, including its huge market, along with Beijing’s policy of attracting young people and grassroots businesses.
This lures increasing numbers of Taiwanese to China, taking with them consumption, which leads to slack domestic investment, which leads to slow growth, which leads to low wages, which makes China more attractive.
If this cycle is not broken, then no matter how hard the government tries, it will never get Taiwan back to its previous annual growth rates of between 4 and 5 percent.
The US faces similar problems, which is why US President Donald Trump proposed a “border adjustment tax” on manufacturers who move their factories abroad during his presidential campaign.
On Feb. 12, Trump proposed levying a “reciprocal tax” on countries that trade unfairly. By the same logic, taxing Taiwanese businesspeople who operate overseas more heavily, such as by levying countervailing duties, would raise the costs that Taiwanese businesspeople face when moving to China. That could gradually stem the tide of Taiwanese businesspeople people moving offshore and is one solution that merits consideration.
Huang Tien-lin is a national policy adviser and former managing director and chairman of First Commercial Bank.
Translated by Julian Clegg
Could Asia be on the verge of a new wave of nuclear proliferation? A look back at the early history of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), which recently celebrated its 75th anniversary, illuminates some reasons for concern in the Indo-Pacific today. US Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin recently described NATO as “the most powerful and successful alliance in history,” but the organization’s early years were not without challenges. At its inception, the signing of the North Atlantic Treaty marked a sea change in American strategic thinking. The United States had been intent on withdrawing from Europe in the years following
My wife and I spent the week in the interior of Taiwan where Shuyuan spent her childhood. In that town there is a street that functions as an open farmer’s market. Walk along that street, as Shuyuan did yesterday, and it is next to impossible to come home empty-handed. Some mangoes that looked vaguely like others we had seen around here ended up on our table. Shuyuan told how she had bought them from a little old farmer woman from the countryside who said the mangoes were from a very old tree she had on her property. The big surprise
The issue of China’s overcapacity has drawn greater global attention recently, with US Secretary of the Treasury Janet Yellen urging Beijing to address its excess production in key industries during her visit to China last week. Meanwhile in Brussels, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen last week said that Europe must have a tough talk with China on its perceived overcapacity and unfair trade practices. The remarks by Yellen and Von der Leyen come as China’s economy is undergoing a painful transition. Beijing is trying to steer the world’s second-largest economy out of a COVID-19 slump, the property crisis and
Ursula K. le Guin in The Ones Who Walked Away from Omelas proposed a thought experiment of a utopian city whose existence depended on one child held captive in a dungeon. When taken to extremes, Le Guin suggests, utilitarian logic violates some of our deepest moral intuitions. Even the greatest social goods — peace, harmony and prosperity — are not worth the sacrifice of an innocent person. Former president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁), since leaving office, has lived an odyssey that has brought him to lows like Le Guin’s dungeon. From late 2008 to 2015 he was imprisoned, much of this