On Tuesday on CNN, Parkland survivor David Hogg was asked by Anderson Cooper about the plethora of right-wing Web sites and social media accounts spreading conspiracy theories about him.
“I’m not a crisis actor. I’m someone who had to witness this and live through this and I continue to be having to do that,” Hogg said in response.
Those with little experience of the febrile world of conspiracy theory might not fully understand what Hogg is being accused of, but the idea that mass shooting victims and witnesses are hired performers serving a dark purpose has over the past decade migrated from the farthest margins of conspiracy media.
Thanks to a range of right-wing media actors, it is now much closer to the mainstream: On Tuesday, a Florida Republican’s aide was fired after he suggested the survivors were actors.
The first thing to understand is that the “crisis actor” conspiracy theory has a slender tie to reality. Crisis actors do exist, although there is nothing underhanded about them: They are simply performers hired to play disaster victims in emergency drills or wounded combatants in military exercises. They provide a degree of realism for people practicing for real emergencies further down the line.
However, in the past few years, the term has been appropriated by conspiracy theorists claiming that mass shootings are staged. Social media users, broadcasters and even political staffers now routinely allege that events like the Parkland shooting are orchestrated by shadowy actors to effect some political goal.
Lately, they are likely to nominate the “deep state” as a culprit — by which they mean segments of the intelligence community and unelected officials who are held to be working against US President Donald Trump and working toward the confiscation or regulation of firearms.
Google trend searches show that searches for the term in the past decade have spiked around high-profile mass shootings. There was a small flurry at about the time of the Tacoma Mall shooting near Seattle in 2005, but by far the biggest spike came at the time of the Newtown shooting, where 26 elementary school students and adults were shot dead at Sandy Hook Elementary School.
By this time, conspiracy culture had already bedded down the concept of “false flag” attacks. This is the idea that powerful forces routinely arrange massacres or terrorist atrocities, and make it appear as if some other individual or group did them to achieve their sinister political goals.
Conspiracy theories surrounding Sept. 11, 2001, had long asserted that while it appeared that the al-Qaeda extremist network was responsible for the attacks in New York, they had really been orchestrated by then-US president George W. Bush’s administration, Mossad, or some other actor to provide a basis for war in the Middle East.
The “crisis actor” concept augments the “false flag” idea. It offers an alternative narrative for incidents of mass violence: Government agencies or other powerful actors stage shootings and then employ actors to play victims, witnesses and bystanders.
If this is true, conspiracy theorists think, it means that the US’ gun violence crisis is not real and has been manufactured to disarm the populace. Some conspiracy theorists would then argue that this is part of a larger plot to subjugate those in the US to tyranny.
The “evidence” presented is often the resemblance between people featured in media reporting of mass shootings and people who have been present at other events. Here, YouTube and other video services provide the raw materials for conspiracy theorizing, in the form of shareable, reusable video, and a venue for the propagation of the resultant “investigations.”
It is no coincidence that the cottage industry of false flag allegations has grown in tandem with the mass uptake of social media — theories are absorbed and spread rapidly online by a range of groups.
Conspiracy broadcasters have large, international audiences, and some polling suggests that up to half of those in the US believe in at least some signature conspiracy theories.
Some outlets spreading “crisis actor” theories, like Alex Jones and True Pundit, have been lent credibility by Trump or members of his family. There has also been some suggestion that conspiracy theory has been automated, with tall tales about the Parkville massacre being spread by a network of bots.
As with conspiracy thinking about Sept. 11, 2001, Alex Jones acted as a major popularizer of crisis actor memes.
Jones said back in 2012 and 2013 that Sandy Hook was a “false flag” and that “no one died.”
He claimed that the children killed were acting for the cameras and that the parents had faked their own children’s deaths.
Under pressure, Jones has sometimes tried to back away from his role in propagating the theory. However, in other incidents since — from Orlando to Las Vegas, Jones’s first resort in his broadcasts and on his Web site has been to assume that the official accounts are elaborate lies and that many on the scene are in on the deception.
Jones and others often take advantage of the inevitable confusion that attends complex events such as mass shootings to freely speculate on the events and lodge their explanation in the minds of their audience.
These theories would be laughable and unworthy of our attention, were it not for their real-world impacts and that so many people accept them.
When Jones was interviewed by Megan Kelly last year, parents of Sandy Hook victims took to the airwaves and the Internet to protest. They said that on top of their grief, they had been harassed for years since the massacre by people who, thanks in part to Jones, believed that they and their dead children were lying.
The teens who are bravely speaking out after the Parkland attack will not only have to contend with conservative media bottom-feeders questioning their competence to speak about the massacre. They will also have to deal with people who think that they are knowingly participating in an elaborate hoax.
Saudi Arabian largesse is flooding Egypt’s cultural scene, but the reception is mixed. Some welcome new “cooperation” between two regional powerhouses, while others fear a hostile takeover by Riyadh. In Cairo, historically the cultural capital of the Arab world, Egyptian Minister of Culture Nevine al-Kilany recently hosted Saudi Arabian General Entertainment Authority chairman Turki al-Sheikh. The deep-pocketed al-Sheikh has emerged as a Medici-like patron for Egypt’s cultural elite, courted by Cairo’s top talent to produce a slew of forthcoming films. A new three-way agreement between al-Sheikh, Kilany and United Media Services — a multi-media conglomerate linked to state intelligence that owns much of
The US and other countries should take concrete steps to confront the threats from Beijing to avoid war, US Representative Mario Diaz-Balart said in an interview with Voice of America on March 13. The US should use “every diplomatic economic tool at our disposal to treat China as what it is... to avoid war,” Diaz-Balart said. Giving an example of what the US could do, he said that it has to be more aggressive in its military sales to Taiwan. Actions by cross-party US lawmakers in the past few years such as meeting with Taiwanese officials in Washington and Taipei, and
The Republic of China (ROC) on Taiwan has no official diplomatic allies in the EU. With the exception of the Vatican, it has no official allies in Europe at all. This does not prevent the ROC — Taiwan — from having close relations with EU member states and other European countries. The exact nature of the relationship does bear revisiting, if only to clarify what is a very complicated and sensitive idea, the details of which leave considerable room for misunderstanding, misrepresentation and disagreement. Only this week, President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) received members of the European Parliament’s Delegation for Relations
Denmark’s “one China” policy more and more resembles Beijing’s “one China” principle. At least, this is how things appear. In recent interactions with the Danish state, such as applying for residency permits, a Taiwanese’s nationality would be listed as “China.” That designation occurs for a Taiwanese student coming to Denmark or a Danish citizen arriving in Denmark with, for example, their Taiwanese partner. Details of this were published on Sunday in an article in the Danish daily Berlingske written by Alexander Sjoberg and Tobias Reinwald. The pretext for this new practice is that Denmark does not recognize Taiwan as a state under