At a legislative hearing on Jan. 25 to assess his suitability, Control Yuan nominee Chen Shih-meng (陳師孟) touched upon the issue of Taiwan’s legal status when he said: “Taiwan is the name of a geographical area, not a country.”
This question is rarely discussed these days. Perhaps it is too abstract to interest most people, or they think there is no way to change the existing situation, so there is no point in talking about it.
However, if Taiwanese are not even clear about where their government came from, that is a big gap in their knowledge about their own history.
The “government of Taiwan” that has existed since 1945 is just a massive “illegal structure” built on someone else’s land, so other nations cannot recognize it.
When Japan surrendered in 1945, the Allied powers ordered the Republic of China (ROC) to cross over to Taiwan to accept the surrender of the Japanese forces stationed there, just as other Allied members went to Germany and Japan to accept their respective surrenders.
These were all temporary military occupations and international law imposes strict limits on the powers of occupying armies, such as that they cannot change the sovereign status of the occupied territory, collect taxes or impose military conscription.
As soon as the ROC’s Nationalist Army landed on Taiwan, the ROC government declared that Taiwan was part of China. In so doing, it trampled on international law by altering Taiwan’s sovereign status and turning Taiwanese into Chinese citizens.
Japan did not surrender solely to China, but to all the Allies, as shown by the flags of the Soviet Union, the US, the ROC and the UK that hung over the stage at the surrender ceremony in Taipei’s Zhongshan Hall.
When the ROC annexed Taiwan, the UK immediately questioned the move and raised objections. However, nations around the world were too busy rebuilding their war-damaged lands to concern themselves with other nations’ business, so nothing was done about the ROC’s unlawful annexation.
On this issue, it is pointless to refer to the 1943 Cairo Declaration, which was no more than a news release and has no legal effect. As for Taiwanese, they indicated that they would welcome the Chinese Nationalist Army before it arrived, but two years after it landed, armed resistance broke out across the island, and that uprising was followed by nearly 40 years of White Terror under martial law.
Even if you read every post-war document relating to Taiwan in detail, you will not find a single document that says Taiwan belongs to China. The KMT’s hired academics can therefore only resort to inapplicable legal terms like uti possidetis or “occupation as possession” to try to give legitimacy to the “government of Taiwan.”
An illegal structure might have a living room, bedrooms, a kitchen, a bathroom and a garage, but however luxurious it might be, it is still illegal.
As for the “government of Taiwan,” it has a president, a legislature and ministries — all the trappings of statehood — but that does not stop it from being an “illegal structure.”
Its political parties and elections are all about wrangling over who will manage this “illegal structure” and they cannot turn it into a legal one.
The only way to make the government of Taiwan legitimate would be to write a new constitution that matches Taiwan’s realities and put it to a referendum. If the majority of voters accept it, the government can become the legal government of Taiwan.
However, it will take a different kind of leader and a different kind of Referendum Act (公投法) to reach that point.
Peng Ming-min was an adviser to former president Chen Shui-bian.
Translated by Julian Clegg
Could Asia be on the verge of a new wave of nuclear proliferation? A look back at the early history of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), which recently celebrated its 75th anniversary, illuminates some reasons for concern in the Indo-Pacific today. US Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin recently described NATO as “the most powerful and successful alliance in history,” but the organization’s early years were not without challenges. At its inception, the signing of the North Atlantic Treaty marked a sea change in American strategic thinking. The United States had been intent on withdrawing from Europe in the years following
My wife and I spent the week in the interior of Taiwan where Shuyuan spent her childhood. In that town there is a street that functions as an open farmer’s market. Walk along that street, as Shuyuan did yesterday, and it is next to impossible to come home empty-handed. Some mangoes that looked vaguely like others we had seen around here ended up on our table. Shuyuan told how she had bought them from a little old farmer woman from the countryside who said the mangoes were from a very old tree she had on her property. The big surprise
Ursula K. le Guin in The Ones Who Walked Away from Omelas proposed a thought experiment of a utopian city whose existence depended on one child held captive in a dungeon. When taken to extremes, Le Guin suggests, utilitarian logic violates some of our deepest moral intuitions. Even the greatest social goods — peace, harmony and prosperity — are not worth the sacrifice of an innocent person. Former president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁), since leaving office, has lived an odyssey that has brought him to lows like Le Guin’s dungeon. From late 2008 to 2015 he was imprisoned, much of this
The issue of China’s overcapacity has drawn greater global attention recently, with US Secretary of the Treasury Janet Yellen urging Beijing to address its excess production in key industries during her visit to China last week. Meanwhile in Brussels, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen last week said that Europe must have a tough talk with China on its perceived overcapacity and unfair trade practices. The remarks by Yellen and Von der Leyen come as China’s economy is undergoing a painful transition. Beijing is trying to steer the world’s second-largest economy out of a COVID-19 slump, the property crisis and