At a legislative hearing on Jan. 25 to assess his suitability, Control Yuan nominee Chen Shih-meng (陳師孟) touched upon the issue of Taiwan’s legal status when he said: “Taiwan is the name of a geographical area, not a country.”
This question is rarely discussed these days. Perhaps it is too abstract to interest most people, or they think there is no way to change the existing situation, so there is no point in talking about it.
However, if Taiwanese are not even clear about where their government came from, that is a big gap in their knowledge about their own history.
The “government of Taiwan” that has existed since 1945 is just a massive “illegal structure” built on someone else’s land, so other nations cannot recognize it.
When Japan surrendered in 1945, the Allied powers ordered the Republic of China (ROC) to cross over to Taiwan to accept the surrender of the Japanese forces stationed there, just as other Allied members went to Germany and Japan to accept their respective surrenders.
These were all temporary military occupations and international law imposes strict limits on the powers of occupying armies, such as that they cannot change the sovereign status of the occupied territory, collect taxes or impose military conscription.
As soon as the ROC’s Nationalist Army landed on Taiwan, the ROC government declared that Taiwan was part of China. In so doing, it trampled on international law by altering Taiwan’s sovereign status and turning Taiwanese into Chinese citizens.
Japan did not surrender solely to China, but to all the Allies, as shown by the flags of the Soviet Union, the US, the ROC and the UK that hung over the stage at the surrender ceremony in Taipei’s Zhongshan Hall.
When the ROC annexed Taiwan, the UK immediately questioned the move and raised objections. However, nations around the world were too busy rebuilding their war-damaged lands to concern themselves with other nations’ business, so nothing was done about the ROC’s unlawful annexation.
On this issue, it is pointless to refer to the 1943 Cairo Declaration, which was no more than a news release and has no legal effect. As for Taiwanese, they indicated that they would welcome the Chinese Nationalist Army before it arrived, but two years after it landed, armed resistance broke out across the island, and that uprising was followed by nearly 40 years of White Terror under martial law.
Even if you read every post-war document relating to Taiwan in detail, you will not find a single document that says Taiwan belongs to China. The KMT’s hired academics can therefore only resort to inapplicable legal terms like uti possidetis or “occupation as possession” to try to give legitimacy to the “government of Taiwan.”
An illegal structure might have a living room, bedrooms, a kitchen, a bathroom and a garage, but however luxurious it might be, it is still illegal.
As for the “government of Taiwan,” it has a president, a legislature and ministries — all the trappings of statehood — but that does not stop it from being an “illegal structure.”
Its political parties and elections are all about wrangling over who will manage this “illegal structure” and they cannot turn it into a legal one.
The only way to make the government of Taiwan legitimate would be to write a new constitution that matches Taiwan’s realities and put it to a referendum. If the majority of voters accept it, the government can become the legal government of Taiwan.
However, it will take a different kind of leader and a different kind of Referendum Act (公投法) to reach that point.
Peng Ming-min was an adviser to former president Chen Shui-bian.
Translated by Julian Clegg
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
The past few months have seen tremendous strides in India’s journey to develop a vibrant semiconductor and electronics ecosystem. The nation’s established prowess in information technology (IT) has earned it much-needed revenue and prestige across the globe. Now, through the convergence of engineering talent, supportive government policies, an expanding market and technologically adaptive entrepreneurship, India is striving to become part of global electronics and semiconductor supply chains. Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Vision of “Make in India” and “Design in India” has been the guiding force behind the government’s incentive schemes that span skilling, design, fabrication, assembly, testing and packaging, and
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
As former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) wrapped up his visit to the People’s Republic of China, he received his share of attention. Certainly, the trip must be seen within the full context of Ma’s life, that is, his eight-year presidency, the Sunflower movement and his failed Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement, as well as his eight years as Taipei mayor with its posturing, accusations of money laundering, and ups and downs. Through all that, basic questions stand out: “What drives Ma? What is his end game?” Having observed and commented on Ma for decades, it is all ironically reminiscent of former US president Harry