The World Bank says that its mission is to end extreme poverty within a generation and boost shared prosperity. These goals are universally agreed as part of the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs).
However, the World Bank lacks an SDG strategy and now it is turning to Wall Street to please its political masters in Washington. Bank president Jim Yong Kim should find a better way forward, and he can do so by revisiting one of his own great successes.
Kim and I worked closely together from 2000 to 2005, to scale up the world’s response to the AIDS epidemic. Partners in Health, the non-governmental organization led by Kim and his colleague, Harvard University’s Paul Farmer, had used antiretroviral medicines (ARVs) to treat about 1,000 impoverished HIV-infected rural residents in Haiti, and had restored them to health and hope.
I pointed out to Kim and Farmer 18 years ago that their success in Haiti could be expanded to reach millions of people at low cost and with very high social benefits. I recommended a new multilateral funding mechanism, a global fund to fight AIDS and a new funding effort by the US.
In early 2001, then-UN secretary-general Kofi Annan launched the Global Fund to Fight AIDS, Tuberculosis and Malaria, and in 2003, then-US president George W. Bush launched the President’s Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief program.
The WHO, then led by former director-general Gro Harlem Brundtland, recruited Kim to lead the WHO’s scale-up effort. Kim did a fantastic job and his efforts provided the groundwork for bringing ARVs to millions, saving lives, livelihoods and families.
There are four lessons of that great success.
First, the private sector was an important partner by offering patent-protected drugs at production cost. Drug companies eschewed profits in the poorest countries out of decency and for the sake of their reputations. They recognized that patent rights, if exercised to excess, would be a death warrant for millions of poor people.
Second, the effort was supported by private philanthropy, led by Bill Gates, who inspired others to contribute as well. The Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation backed the new Global Fund, the WHO and the Commission on Macroeconomics and Health, which I led for the WHO from 2000 to 2001 — and which successfully campaigned for increased donor funding to fight AIDS and other killer diseases.
Third, the funding to fight AIDS took the form of outright grants, not Wall Street loans. Fighting AIDS in poor countries was not viewed as a revenue-generating investment needing fancy financial engineering. It was regarded as a vital public good that required philanthropists and high-income nations to fund life-saving treatment for poor and dying people.
Fourth, trained public health specialists led the entire effort, with Kim and Farmer serving as models of professionalism and rectitude. The Global Fund does not stuff the pockets of corrupt ministers or trade funding for oil concessions or arms deals. The Global Fund applies rigorous, technical standards of public health and holds recipient nations accountable — including through transparency and cofinancing requirements — for delivering services.
The World Bank needs to return to its mission. The SDGs call for, among other things, ending extreme poverty and hunger, instituting universal health coverage, and universal primary and upper secondary education by 2030.
However, despite making only slow progress toward these goals, the bank shows no alarm or strategy to help get the SDGs on track for 2030. On the contrary, rather than embrace the SDGs, the Bank is practically mute and its officials have even been heard to mutter negatively about them in the corridors of power.
Perhaps US President Donald Trump does not want to hear about his government’s responsibilities vis-a-vis the SDGs, but it is Kim’s job to remind him and the US Congress of those obligations — and that it was a Republican president, Bush, who creatively and successfully pursued the battle against AIDS.
Wall Street might help structure the financing of large-scale renewable energy projects, public transport, highways and other infrastructure that can pay its way with tolls and user fees. A World Bank-Wall Street partnership could help ensure that such projects are environmentally sound and fair to the affected communities. That would be all for the good.
However, such projects — designed for profit or at least direct cost recovery — are not even remotely sufficient to end extreme poverty. Poor countries need grants, not loans, for basic needs like health and education.
Kim should draw on his experience as the global health champion who successfully battled against AIDS, rather than embracing an approach that would only bury poor countries in debt. We need the World Bank’s voice and strenuous efforts to mobilize grant financing for the SDGs.
Healthcare for the poor requires systematic training and deployment of community health workers, diagnostics, medicines and information systems. Education for the poor requires trained teachers, safe and modern classrooms, and connectivity to other schools and to online curricula.
These SDGs can be achieved, but only if there is a clear strategy, grant financing and clear delivery mechanisms. The World Bank should develop the expertise to help donors and recipient governments make these programs work. Kim knows just how to do this, from his own experience.
Trump and other world leaders are personally accountable for the SDGs. They need to do vastly more.
So do the world’s super-rich, whose degree of wealth is historically unprecedented. The super-rich have received round after round of tax cuts and special tax breaks, easy credits from central banks and exceptional gains from technologies that are boosting profits while lowering unskilled workers’ wages.
Even with stock markets’ recent softness, the world’s more than 2,000 billionaires have about US$10 trillion in wealth — enough to fund fully the incremental effort needed to end extreme poverty if governments also do their part.
When going to Wall Street, or Davos, or other centers of wealth, the World Bank should inspire the billionaires to put their surging wealth into personal philanthropy to support the SDGs. Bill Gates is doing this, with historic results, for public health.
Which billionaires will champion the SDGs for education, renewable energy, fresh water and sanitation, and sustainable agriculture? With a clear SDG plan, the World Bank would find partners to help it fulfill its core, historic and vital mission.
Jeffrey Sachs is a professor of sustainable development and a professor of health policy and management at Columbia University, and director of the university’s Center for Sustainable Development and of the UN Sustainable Development Solutions Network.
Copyright: Project Syndicate
Saudi Arabian largesse is flooding Egypt’s cultural scene, but the reception is mixed. Some welcome new “cooperation” between two regional powerhouses, while others fear a hostile takeover by Riyadh. In Cairo, historically the cultural capital of the Arab world, Egyptian Minister of Culture Nevine al-Kilany recently hosted Saudi Arabian General Entertainment Authority chairman Turki al-Sheikh. The deep-pocketed al-Sheikh has emerged as a Medici-like patron for Egypt’s cultural elite, courted by Cairo’s top talent to produce a slew of forthcoming films. A new three-way agreement between al-Sheikh, Kilany and United Media Services — a multi-media conglomerate linked to state intelligence that owns much of
The US and other countries should take concrete steps to confront the threats from Beijing to avoid war, US Representative Mario Diaz-Balart said in an interview with Voice of America on March 13. The US should use “every diplomatic economic tool at our disposal to treat China as what it is... to avoid war,” Diaz-Balart said. Giving an example of what the US could do, he said that it has to be more aggressive in its military sales to Taiwan. Actions by cross-party US lawmakers in the past few years such as meeting with Taiwanese officials in Washington and Taipei, and
The Republic of China (ROC) on Taiwan has no official diplomatic allies in the EU. With the exception of the Vatican, it has no official allies in Europe at all. This does not prevent the ROC — Taiwan — from having close relations with EU member states and other European countries. The exact nature of the relationship does bear revisiting, if only to clarify what is a very complicated and sensitive idea, the details of which leave considerable room for misunderstanding, misrepresentation and disagreement. Only this week, President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) received members of the European Parliament’s Delegation for Relations
Denmark’s “one China” policy more and more resembles Beijing’s “one China” principle. At least, this is how things appear. In recent interactions with the Danish state, such as applying for residency permits, a Taiwanese’s nationality would be listed as “China.” That designation occurs for a Taiwanese student coming to Denmark or a Danish citizen arriving in Denmark with, for example, their Taiwanese partner. Details of this were published on Sunday in an article in the Danish daily Berlingske written by Alexander Sjoberg and Tobias Reinwald. The pretext for this new practice is that Denmark does not recognize Taiwan as a state under