There have been media reports that the dispute between the Holy See and China over appointing bishops might have been settled and that the Vatican would ask some bishops appointed by the Holy See to stand aside and make way for their China-selected counterparts, a scenario that poses dangers to Vatican-Taiwan diplomatic ties.
The Holy See is likely to take a patient approach to dealing with its relations with China, and it will likely be a long process. Even if China were to reach an agreement with the Holy See on the right to appoint bishops, this should not be simplistically taken to mean that the two sides are forming diplomatic ties, as there are several other problems in their relationship.
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) government established diplomatic relations with the Holy See in October 1942. After the cross-strait political division, the Holy See has held firmly to its “one China” policy — that is, recognizing the Republic of China government as the only representative of China — and named its embassy in Taipei the “Apostolic Nunciature to China.”
Every time the Vatican secretary of state sends out formal notifications to the ROC’s embassy to the Holy See, the addressee is always the “Embassy of China to the Holy See.”
If the Vatican reaches an agreement with the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) regime on establishing diplomatic ties, the “Apostolic Nunciature to China” will simply be moved from Taipei to Beijing, and it will have nothing to do with whether the two sides of the Taiwan Strait are unified.
The obstacle to Holy See-China relations is not the “one China” policy or the “Taiwan issue,” but rather the atheism and materialism espoused by the CCP, ideologies that run counter to the doctrines of Catholicism.
During the revolutionary period, the CCP treated Catholic missionary work in China as part of imperialism, and Beijing has looked upon the Holy See with hostility since then.
Moreover, the reason there has never been a breakthrough in relations between Beijing and the Holy See is that the Chinese authorities must recognize the Holy See’s right to appoint bishops for the Chinese dioceses. The selection and consecration of bishops by the Chinese Patriotic Catholic Association in every Chinese diocese are not in compliance with the Catholic Church hierarchy, in which all bishops of the universal church must be appointed by the pope.
This is also the key which helps explain former pope Benedict XVI’s saying in a pastoral letter in 2007 that some entities are “incompatible with Catholic doctrine.”
Another obstacle blocking relations between the Holy See and China being normalized is the split between the underground church and the state-controlled open church. Relieving this tension and promoting mutual forgiveness and reconciliation, and eventually unifying the two sides, is no easier than compromising on the right to appoint bishops.
The clergy, practitioners and lay faithful of the underground church have suffered greatly from the CCP’s prosecution, simply because they insist on realizing a faithful life lived in accordance to the Gospels.
The underground faithful cannot let go of the past suffering to be unified with the state-controlled open church. Although the Holy See stopped publicly consecrating underground bishops in 2005 to facilitate and promote the unification of the Catholic Church in China, waiting for the proper opportunity to resolve the conflict between the state-controlled and the underground churches requires time.
After the reform and opening up period, the Chinese authorities have not denied the Holy See’s religious authority over the Chinese Catholic Church, but neither do they acknowledge papal authority over the Chinese dioceses, and this ambivalence has split the Catholic Church in China.
Today, there are still two bishops in some dioceses in China, one appointed by the Holy See and one by Beijing, and this causes division in these dioceses.
Furthermore, the CCP still prohibits members from joining the church, and the atheism rooted in the communist ideology is incompatible with Christian religion.
Only when China recognizes the existence of God and acknowledges Christ as the Messiah will the time be mature for normal relations between the Holy See and Beijing.
When that day comes, the CCP regime will no longer be able to stop the sparkles of conscience and freedom from igniting large flames sweeping across the country, and this is the underlying fear behind China’s unwillingness to normalize relations with the Holy See.
Archbishop Celso Benigno Luigi Costantini, the first Apostolic delegate to China, once said that God is completely fair and just, and that the Holy See will never compromise to please anyone.
The Holy See is not an ordinary secular country, and its diplomatic ties are of a unique character. It is therefore unlikely that Pope Francis will establish ties with Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) in exchange for the right to appoint bishops.
Ho Szu-shen is a professor in Fu Jen Catholic University’s Japanese language and culture department.
Translated by Chang Ho-ming
Could Asia be on the verge of a new wave of nuclear proliferation? A look back at the early history of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), which recently celebrated its 75th anniversary, illuminates some reasons for concern in the Indo-Pacific today. US Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin recently described NATO as “the most powerful and successful alliance in history,” but the organization’s early years were not without challenges. At its inception, the signing of the North Atlantic Treaty marked a sea change in American strategic thinking. The United States had been intent on withdrawing from Europe in the years following
My wife and I spent the week in the interior of Taiwan where Shuyuan spent her childhood. In that town there is a street that functions as an open farmer’s market. Walk along that street, as Shuyuan did yesterday, and it is next to impossible to come home empty-handed. Some mangoes that looked vaguely like others we had seen around here ended up on our table. Shuyuan told how she had bought them from a little old farmer woman from the countryside who said the mangoes were from a very old tree she had on her property. The big surprise
The issue of China’s overcapacity has drawn greater global attention recently, with US Secretary of the Treasury Janet Yellen urging Beijing to address its excess production in key industries during her visit to China last week. Meanwhile in Brussels, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen last week said that Europe must have a tough talk with China on its perceived overcapacity and unfair trade practices. The remarks by Yellen and Von der Leyen come as China’s economy is undergoing a painful transition. Beijing is trying to steer the world’s second-largest economy out of a COVID-19 slump, the property crisis and
Ursula K. le Guin in The Ones Who Walked Away from Omelas proposed a thought experiment of a utopian city whose existence depended on one child held captive in a dungeon. When taken to extremes, Le Guin suggests, utilitarian logic violates some of our deepest moral intuitions. Even the greatest social goods — peace, harmony and prosperity — are not worth the sacrifice of an innocent person. Former president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁), since leaving office, has lived an odyssey that has brought him to lows like Le Guin’s dungeon. From late 2008 to 2015 he was imprisoned, much of this