After several years in office, it is surprising to discover that Taipei Mayor Ko Wen-je (柯文哲) does not know what Taiwanese values are. A similar scenario would be inconceivable in the US — would the mayor of Washington dare say in public: “I don’t know what American values are.”
It is also surprising that Ko, who said he has visited the Deng Nan-jung (鄭南榕) Memorial Museum twice, does not know that genuine Taiwanese values are treasured at this, the place of Deng’s self-immolation.
Why, then, was Ko visiting the museum with such a solemn and respectful expression?
There is no display of Mao Zedong’s (毛澤東) quotations, which Ko recites so fluently from memory, nor are there any illustrations of the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) strategic plans, which Ko went to Yanan, China, to learn. Nor is there an exhibition displaying former president Chiang Ching-kuo’s (蔣經國) “enlightened despotism” rule, which Ko has said he admires so highly.
At the museum, there is only a banner of “Taiwan spirit,” burned by flames and smoke.
What were the values that Deng, the embodiment of “Taiwan spirit,” sacrificed his life for?
Attending to a myriad of city affairs, there is no need for Ko to read every article Deng wrote. He only has to remember Deng’s passionate and proud statement: “My name is Deng Nan-jung. I support 100 percent freedom of speech and I support Taiwanese independence.”
There is no need for Ko to keep repeating the deceptive slogan that “the two sides of the Taiwan Strait are one family.” All he has to do to win the public’s respect is quote Deng’s courageous declaration.
The museum’s footage of Deng making these statements reminds me of a breathtaking scene in Mel Gibson’s 1995 film Braveheart. In the movie, William Wallace, one of the leaders during the Wars of Scottish Independence, just before before he is executed shouts: “Freedom!”
In real life, Wallace was betrayed and turned over to King Edward I of England. He was tried for high treason and was hanged, eviscerated and then quartered.
There is another famous saying by Wallace: “Everybody dies, not everybody lives.”
Ko should reflect closely on this statement.
As a political commentator and editor-in-chief of a weekly magazine, Deng valued freedom of speech above all else. The freedom of speech certainly cannot exist in isolation, but must be bound closely with other freedoms and rights, such as personal freedom, the right to property, freedom of religious belief, freedom of assembly and association, and the freedom to form political parties.
Since these freedoms have become universal values, they should also be counted as Taiwanese values.
The second half of Deng’s proclamation — “I support Taiwanese independence” — should not be overlooked, either. There is no such thing as freedom of speech if saying “Taiwanese independence” in public is prohibited.
While Taiwan’s international status remains ambiguous, Taiwanese independence forms the core of Taiwanese values, and Taiwanese should do all they can to achieve and defend it.
If Ko wholeheartedly respects and recognizes Deng and his spirit, public statements and policy implementation by the mayor’s office should be based on freedom and independence, the two significant Taiwanese values that Deng sacrificed his life for.
It is shameful to casually take advantage of Deng’s reputation and bravery, and it will only result in Ko being spurned by the public.
Yu Jie is an exiled Chinese dissident writer.
Translated by Chang Ho-ming
Saudi Arabian largesse is flooding Egypt’s cultural scene, but the reception is mixed. Some welcome new “cooperation” between two regional powerhouses, while others fear a hostile takeover by Riyadh. In Cairo, historically the cultural capital of the Arab world, Egyptian Minister of Culture Nevine al-Kilany recently hosted Saudi Arabian General Entertainment Authority chairman Turki al-Sheikh. The deep-pocketed al-Sheikh has emerged as a Medici-like patron for Egypt’s cultural elite, courted by Cairo’s top talent to produce a slew of forthcoming films. A new three-way agreement between al-Sheikh, Kilany and United Media Services — a multi-media conglomerate linked to state intelligence that owns much of
The US and other countries should take concrete steps to confront the threats from Beijing to avoid war, US Representative Mario Diaz-Balart said in an interview with Voice of America on March 13. The US should use “every diplomatic economic tool at our disposal to treat China as what it is... to avoid war,” Diaz-Balart said. Giving an example of what the US could do, he said that it has to be more aggressive in its military sales to Taiwan. Actions by cross-party US lawmakers in the past few years such as meeting with Taiwanese officials in Washington and Taipei, and
The Republic of China (ROC) on Taiwan has no official diplomatic allies in the EU. With the exception of the Vatican, it has no official allies in Europe at all. This does not prevent the ROC — Taiwan — from having close relations with EU member states and other European countries. The exact nature of the relationship does bear revisiting, if only to clarify what is a very complicated and sensitive idea, the details of which leave considerable room for misunderstanding, misrepresentation and disagreement. Only this week, President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) received members of the European Parliament’s Delegation for Relations
Denmark’s “one China” policy more and more resembles Beijing’s “one China” principle. At least, this is how things appear. In recent interactions with the Danish state, such as applying for residency permits, a Taiwanese’s nationality would be listed as “China.” That designation occurs for a Taiwanese student coming to Denmark or a Danish citizen arriving in Denmark with, for example, their Taiwanese partner. Details of this were published on Sunday in an article in the Danish daily Berlingske written by Alexander Sjoberg and Tobias Reinwald. The pretext for this new practice is that Denmark does not recognize Taiwan as a state under