Because it is such a riveting clown show with crazy episodes almost every day, Europeans can be forgiven for ignoring that Brexit is going to hurt them too.
However, as the date of Britain’s departure comes closer and British Prime Minister Theresa May’s government continues its kamikaze policy of demanding the politically unthinkable from the EU, it is time for Europeans to wake up and begin preparing for the worst.
The Dutch government on Thursday published a report drawn up by the consultancy firm KPMG analyzing the consequences of a “no-deal” Brexit in which the UK leaves the EU without an agreement on March 29 next year.
Here are the practical implications and cold numbers behind the hot-headed rhetoric about no deal with the EU being “better than a bad deal” for Britain:
Should the UK “crash” out of the EU by late March next year, the Dutch companies trading with the UK would have to secure a total of no less than 4.2 million exporting and 750,000 importing licenses. If by this time both states have a functioning customs system in place — a big “if” for this consistently incompetent UK government — costs for companies are between 80 euros and 130 euros (US$98 and US$159). That is per license.
The price tag for all this new red tape is 600 million euros for the Dutch side alone. This excludes the costs of new export and import tariffs, value-added tax and other new “sector-specific” barriers for trading with the UK.
The 35,000 small and medium-sized businesses unused to trading with non-EU countries also face an estimated cost of 20,000 euros to 50,000 euros to adapt their IT systems.
Added to this must be the likely effects of the inevitable economic slowdown — or worse — in Britain, the report says.
When the nation leaves without a deal it must “fall back” on the minimal WTO rules for trade, but financial services and aviation fall outside the WTO regime, meaning that after a British no-deal departure, both sectors must stop trading with the EU overnight. Between Amsterdam’s Schiphol Airport and London alone there are 60 flights a day — one every 15 minutes.
Much like US President Donald Trump, the Brexiteers have proven themselves immune to information or insight that does not meet their emotional needs. This must be why they continue to hope and insist that to avoid this proliferation of new barriers to trade, the EU will relent and allow Britain to have its cake and eat it — to forget about the obligations of EU membership while continuing to enjoy its many advantages.
This simply will not happen. Even the ardently pro-British Dutch government has made clear again that the choice for Britain is simple.
It can buckle and accept the EU’s conditions for continued “frictionless trade,” or it becomes a “third country” on the periphery of Europe — like Morocco or Turkey, except that Turkey will have more privileges, because of its customs union with the EU.
About 200,000 Dutch jobs are involved in trade with the UK and, according to calculations by the prestigious CPB Netherlands Bureau for Economic Policy Analysis, a hard Brexit could make every Dutch person poorer by an average of 1,000 euros.
However, the Dutch government did not use the report to make the case for concessions to Britain. Instead, Dutch State Secretary for Economic Affairs and Climate Policy Mona Keijzer simply said that “it is up to businesses to start preparing.” It also called on government agencies to get ready.
The logic is simple: While the economic shock of a British crash out of the EU will hurt the Dutch economy, blowing up the EU from within by giving Britain a sweet special deal is even more damaging, because that will encourage each of the 27 remaining member states to seek its own exceptions. Over time this will make the unraveling of the EU single market a near-certainty.
So next time you hear a Brexiteer proudly declare that “no deal is better than a bad deal,” remember that for once this Brexiteer is correct. Not as far as Britain is concerned of course, because “no deal” for the UK means the severe disruption of not just one trade flow — as it is for the Netherlands — but of 27.
However, for EU member states, the negative economic fallout of a British crash departure is far more preferable than the utter catastrophe of the single market imploding. Painful as it will be, no deal with Britain is indeed better for the EU than a bad deal.
Joris Luyendijk is a Dutch journalist.
Taiwan’s status in the world community is experiencing something really different; it’s being treated like a normal country. And not just a “normal” country, more like a valuable, constructive, democratic and generous country. This is not simply an artifact of Taiwan’s successes in combatting the novel coronavirus. It is a new attitude, weighing Taiwan’s democracy against China’s lack of it. Before I continue, I should apologize to the readers of the Taipei Times. I have not visited Taipei since the opening of the American Institute in Taiwan’s new chancery building in Neihu last year, so I was unprepared for the photograph
On Sept. 27, 2002, the Democratic Republic of Timor-Leste (East Timor) joined the UN to become its 191st member. Since then, two other nations have joined, Montenegro on June 28, 2006, and South Sudan on July 14, 2011. The combined total of the populations of these three nations is just more than half that of Taiwan’s 23.7 million people. East Timor has 1.3 million, Montenegro has slightly more than half a million and South Sudan has 10.9 million. They all are members of the UN, yet much more populous Taiwan is denied membership. Of the three, East Timor, as a Southeast Asian
At a June 12 news conference held by the Talent Circulation Alliance to announce the release of its white paper for this year, President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) emphasized that, in this era of globalization, Taiwan should focus on improving foreign language and digital abilities when cultivating talent, so that it stands out from global competitors. I suggest the government should consider building a professional translation industry. If the public believes that there is a relationship between learning English and national competitiveness, then the nation must consider the social cost of language education. This should be assessed to maximise educational effectiveness: Is
There have been media reports that the Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) plans to hold military exercises in August to simulate seizing the Pratas Islands (Dongsha Islands, 東沙群島) in the South China Sea. In the past, only Coast Guard Administration (CGA) personnel have been stationed there, but the Ministry of National Defense has dispatched the Republic of China Marine Corps to the islands, nominally for “ex-situ training,” to prevent a Chinese attack under the guise of military drills. The move is only a temporary measure and not sufficiently proactive. Instead, the government should officially declare sovereignty over the islands and station troops