The time and place were grim. The country’s population had doubled in a century and tillable land for farming was becoming scarce. Then came a three-year cycle of heavy rains and drought that drove many from their land, hungry, to seek new economic opportunities abroad.
Faced with such hardship, 60,000 people fled during these three years to the US. Many more, in a familiar pattern, would follow those first migrants in the years to come to the communities they founded.
If this story sounds utterly modern in its familiarity, it is not, because the country described above is not Haiti or El Salvador or an African nation — places reportedly derided this week as “shitholes” by US President Donald Trump (who now denies he used precisely these words). Instead, it describes a Scandinavia — or more precisely the Sweden of the mid-1860s — whose migrants would become one of the engines of the US push west, with many settling in the prairies of the Midwest.
Illustration: Yusha
It was not only poor Swedes who came to the US looking for a better future. The reality is that migration to the US has long been fuelled by grinding poverty and inequality, and the promise of something better.
Irish immigrants left for broadly similar reasons to the Swedes and other Scandinavians. The 4 million Italians who arrived in the US between 1880 and 1924 — half of them in the decade between 1900 and 1910 — were often from the poorest, rural backgrounds.
Just as familiar as those waves of migration — and the factors driving them — is the response of nativists such as Trump.
The US is a nation built on migration and cheap labor from disadvantaged countries, but each nativist moment in its history has been accompanied by similar rhetoric, words that have treated an impoverished or troubled place of origin as a judgement on those fleeing, rather than seeing them simply as victims of circumstance.
For the Know Nothing movement of the 1850s, and the American Party it briefly spawned — whose views have so much in common with the current anti-Muslim sentiment of Trump’s populist moment — that hostility was aimed at poor Irish Catholic migrants. It feared they would take jobs and move into positions of influence, not least in government, while maintaining allegiance to the pope.
While the Know Nothings quickly imploded over the question of slavery, they set a template for all the periodic outbreaks of nativism that would follow. The origin of migrants, it would be argued again and again by populist politicians, made them inferior. Their arrival threatened jobs and their tendencies were criminal. Their beliefs were inimical to traditional US values.
Twenty years after the Know Nothings, the same sentiment re-emerged as fear of Chinese immigrant labor, gaining enough traction to see the passage in 1882 of the Chinese Exclusion Act severely limiting future immigration and barring Chinese residents from obtaining US citizenship — the first major piece of US anti-immigration legislation. That in turn would be followed by the Immigration Acts of 1921 and 1924 restricting the immigration of European and Asian immigrants.
If Trump’s “shithole” comments are unsurprising, it is because he has built a political movement on these kinds of judgments. It was of Mexico, during his the campaign, that he suggested “when [it] sends its people, they’re not sending their best, they’re bringing crime, they’re rapists.”
For Trump, similar to the US nativist movements that preceded him, only the white and wealthy are attractive as new US residents — such as the wealthy Norwegians of today — not the Scandinavians of the 1860s. What he forgets — perhaps more likely does not know — is that the US was built by those migrating from what a Trump of that era would have doubtless called “shitholes.”
Could Asia be on the verge of a new wave of nuclear proliferation? A look back at the early history of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), which recently celebrated its 75th anniversary, illuminates some reasons for concern in the Indo-Pacific today. US Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin recently described NATO as “the most powerful and successful alliance in history,” but the organization’s early years were not without challenges. At its inception, the signing of the North Atlantic Treaty marked a sea change in American strategic thinking. The United States had been intent on withdrawing from Europe in the years following
My wife and I spent the week in the interior of Taiwan where Shuyuan spent her childhood. In that town there is a street that functions as an open farmer’s market. Walk along that street, as Shuyuan did yesterday, and it is next to impossible to come home empty-handed. Some mangoes that looked vaguely like others we had seen around here ended up on our table. Shuyuan told how she had bought them from a little old farmer woman from the countryside who said the mangoes were from a very old tree she had on her property. The big surprise
The issue of China’s overcapacity has drawn greater global attention recently, with US Secretary of the Treasury Janet Yellen urging Beijing to address its excess production in key industries during her visit to China last week. Meanwhile in Brussels, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen last week said that Europe must have a tough talk with China on its perceived overcapacity and unfair trade practices. The remarks by Yellen and Von der Leyen come as China’s economy is undergoing a painful transition. Beijing is trying to steer the world’s second-largest economy out of a COVID-19 slump, the property crisis and
As former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) wrapped up his visit to the People’s Republic of China, he received his share of attention. Certainly, the trip must be seen within the full context of Ma’s life, that is, his eight-year presidency, the Sunflower movement and his failed Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement, as well as his eight years as Taipei mayor with its posturing, accusations of money laundering, and ups and downs. Through all that, basic questions stand out: “What drives Ma? What is his end game?” Having observed and commented on Ma for decades, it is all ironically reminiscent of former US president Harry