Western reactions to events in Iran have been as fascinating to watch as the events themselves. It is true that the picture is complex, but the hesitancy on view everywhere — and the lack of publicly supportive messages to protesters — are a sign of our times. It is as if any groundswell of popular aspirations now raises suspicion.
In the aftermath of the Arab Spring, US President Donald Trump and fake news, we seem to have become disillusioned about grassroots revolts.
What might once have been hailed as a democratic revolution now appears blurry. An outpouring of anger against a corrupt regime and its diversion of resources into military adventures is met more with skepticism than hope. There are instant suggestions of a CIA-led plot or an Israeli plan.
USEFUL DIVERSION
The trouble is that authoritarian regimes stand to gain from such conspiracy theories. Speculation about external forces fostering unrest offers autocrats an immediate diversion from the question of why people are revolting.
Thirty years ago, the US political scientist Gene Sharp watched Burmese monks rise up against the military junta. He went on to write the rulebook of non-violent revolution, From Dictatorship to Democracy, which has served as a model for protesters from Serbia to Egypt.
There was a time when Western public opinion applauded such developments. No longer, it seems.
We feel burned: Look at what has become of Egypt since we cheered former Egyptian president Hosni Mubarak’s overthrow in 2011.
Even Myanmar’s fight for freedom has become painful to recall, with Burmese State Counselor Aung San Suu Kyi having fallen off our heroes’ list following the Rohingya massacres.
Reality is always more complicated than political theory, of course.
That Trump has tweeted in support of Iranian protesters serves as a kind of disqualification in itself, but perhaps we should also stop and think about the cynicism or numbness that seems to have gripped us.
To be sure, there is much we do not know about Iran, where independent media coverage is hard to come by, but there is also much we do know.
Last month’s announcement that the next budget would cut subsidies that were lifelines to low-income households served as a trigger.
In provincial towns, crowds gathered to vent frustration against inflation and a general sense of injustice.
‘EGG REVOLUTION’
Some dubbed this the “egg revolution,” because the price of basic foods was set to spike. Now, full-on repression has been unleashed.
Iran matters a lot. Its weight in the Middle East can hardly be overestimated. Alongside Russia, it has played a key role in crushing opposition to dictatorship in Syria. The horror of Syria’s killing fields — with an estimated 500,000 deaths — was a key reason for the massive refugee movement that has upended European politics.
Iran is a topic the US political scene can easily go berserk over — we have known that since 1979 — but Europe is on the Middle East’s doorstep. We surely have an interest in change.
Resignation and confusion are exactly what autocracies around the world want from democratic countries. It is also what their disinformation seeks to entrench. By being immune to enthusiasm when people rise up, we squander the values we claim to want to defend.
True, this might not be a repetition of the 2009 Iranian opposition Green movement, which lasted months and was largely led by educated, urban elites, but is it only when English-speaking groups take to the streets that we should show support?
Not everyone has read Gene Sharp’s book. The downtrodden do not always use codes we can easily relate to, but that makes their grievances no less real, their demands no less legitimate.
OBAMA’S OBSESSION
In 2009, unlike Trump today, then-US president Barack Obama refrained from showing any interest in the Iranian people’s power. He was obsessed with pulling off a nuclear deal with the regime — an objective that also went a long way to explaining his lack of action over Syria. Many in the Arab and Muslim world saw this as a massive let-down.
By contrast, on Feb. 11, 2011, the day Mubarak was toppled, Obama spoke of “the power of human dignity” that can “never be denied.”
“We can’t help but hear the echoes of history — echoes from Germans tearing down a wall, Indonesian students taking to the streets, Gandhi leading his people down the path of justice,” he said.
Who dares wax lyrical about Iranian democratic aspirations these days?
It took EU High Representative for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy Federica Mogherini a full five days after the start of the Iranian protests to say: “Human rights have always been a core issue of our relationship with Iran.”
Well, then. Of course, there are other issues at stake, such as preserving the nuclear deal Trump wants to tear up, but what about the rest of us watching? Is it enough to sit back? Can we avert our gaze when the Iranian regime helps massacre populations in Syria’s eastern Ghouta District? Has Saudi behavior in Yemen drained our capacity for indignation?
Our mental withdrawal might be precisely what spells more, not less, trouble down the line. The shrinking of our minds and the knee-jerk reactions that can come with the necessary criticism of Trump risk becoming an opt-out. Iranians deserve better.
Saudi Arabian largesse is flooding Egypt’s cultural scene, but the reception is mixed. Some welcome new “cooperation” between two regional powerhouses, while others fear a hostile takeover by Riyadh. In Cairo, historically the cultural capital of the Arab world, Egyptian Minister of Culture Nevine al-Kilany recently hosted Saudi Arabian General Entertainment Authority chairman Turki al-Sheikh. The deep-pocketed al-Sheikh has emerged as a Medici-like patron for Egypt’s cultural elite, courted by Cairo’s top talent to produce a slew of forthcoming films. A new three-way agreement between al-Sheikh, Kilany and United Media Services — a multi-media conglomerate linked to state intelligence that owns much of
The US and other countries should take concrete steps to confront the threats from Beijing to avoid war, US Representative Mario Diaz-Balart said in an interview with Voice of America on March 13. The US should use “every diplomatic economic tool at our disposal to treat China as what it is... to avoid war,” Diaz-Balart said. Giving an example of what the US could do, he said that it has to be more aggressive in its military sales to Taiwan. Actions by cross-party US lawmakers in the past few years such as meeting with Taiwanese officials in Washington and Taipei, and
The Republic of China (ROC) on Taiwan has no official diplomatic allies in the EU. With the exception of the Vatican, it has no official allies in Europe at all. This does not prevent the ROC — Taiwan — from having close relations with EU member states and other European countries. The exact nature of the relationship does bear revisiting, if only to clarify what is a very complicated and sensitive idea, the details of which leave considerable room for misunderstanding, misrepresentation and disagreement. Only this week, President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) received members of the European Parliament’s Delegation for Relations
Denmark’s “one China” policy more and more resembles Beijing’s “one China” principle. At least, this is how things appear. In recent interactions with the Danish state, such as applying for residency permits, a Taiwanese’s nationality would be listed as “China.” That designation occurs for a Taiwanese student coming to Denmark or a Danish citizen arriving in Denmark with, for example, their Taiwanese partner. Details of this were published on Sunday in an article in the Danish daily Berlingske written by Alexander Sjoberg and Tobias Reinwald. The pretext for this new practice is that Denmark does not recognize Taiwan as a state under