The government’s New Southbound Policy will continue to develop and hopefully bear fruit over the course of this year. It is a vision of increased regional engagement that specifically does not include China.
This is in contrast to a global strategy developed by China that is already paying dividends. According to a new report by a US research firm, the Eurasia Group, the success of China’s model is the largest global risk for this year.
Essentially, the report predicts China’s increasing ability to dictate the terms of the international world order and the way trade and business is carried out.
It says this is due to China’s growing political and financial clout in actual terms, but also in relative terms to the perceived withdrawal of the US, under US President Donald Trump, from the role of promoter of US-led multilateralism.
This causes concerns about the creation of a power vacuum in the world generally, but also — and most pertinently to Taiwan and its New Southbound Policy — in Asia. This vacuum is one that China is certain to want to fill.
The New Southbound Policy is about exporting Taiwanese values, goodwill and understanding, as well as technology, to create a relationship between Taiwan and targeted countries that will be more conducive to trade and investment.
It is an attempt to cultivate a network of nations bound by cultural exchanges and mutual benefit. It is built upon tried and tested forms of soft power development.
By contrast, China is exporting the opposite: A purely transactional approach — the only political value of which, according to the report, is the principle of non-interference in other countries’ affairs.
“No country today has developed as effective a global trade and investment strategy as Beijing. China is writing checks and creating a global architecture while others are thinking locally or bilaterally,” the report says.
The problem for Taiwan is that Beijing is in a very strong position. Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) is — according to many accounts — the strongest leader the nation has had for decades, and the anticipated political liberalization driven by a rising middle class has failed to materialize. This comes at a time when the US has possibly its weakest leader in decades.
In addition, there is a perception that China’s political model, regardless of domestic challenges, is stronger than ever, just as the US political model is perceived as having been weakened, the report says.
This is increasingly leading to a situation in which Chinese economic and political influence are becoming dominant in more countries.
The question is, will Taiwan’s approach in the region be sufficient to counter China’s efforts? It will be difficult for the government to provide inducements more attractive than what China has to offer.
Any reluctance based upon China’s authoritarianism is decreasing, too. According to the Eurasia Group, the attractiveness of Western liberal democracies has faded since the global financial crisis of 2008, and China is offering a viable alternative. While the firm concedes that China’s model will not be appealing to Western nations, it is a “plausible alternative” for many others.
The report concludes by saying: “With Xi ready and willing to offer that alternative and extend China’s influence, that’s the world’s biggest risk this year.”
It is likely to also be the biggest challenge to the viability of the New Southbound Policy.
Could Asia be on the verge of a new wave of nuclear proliferation? A look back at the early history of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), which recently celebrated its 75th anniversary, illuminates some reasons for concern in the Indo-Pacific today. US Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin recently described NATO as “the most powerful and successful alliance in history,” but the organization’s early years were not without challenges. At its inception, the signing of the North Atlantic Treaty marked a sea change in American strategic thinking. The United States had been intent on withdrawing from Europe in the years following
My wife and I spent the week in the interior of Taiwan where Shuyuan spent her childhood. In that town there is a street that functions as an open farmer’s market. Walk along that street, as Shuyuan did yesterday, and it is next to impossible to come home empty-handed. Some mangoes that looked vaguely like others we had seen around here ended up on our table. Shuyuan told how she had bought them from a little old farmer woman from the countryside who said the mangoes were from a very old tree she had on her property. The big surprise
The issue of China’s overcapacity has drawn greater global attention recently, with US Secretary of the Treasury Janet Yellen urging Beijing to address its excess production in key industries during her visit to China last week. Meanwhile in Brussels, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen last week said that Europe must have a tough talk with China on its perceived overcapacity and unfair trade practices. The remarks by Yellen and Von der Leyen come as China’s economy is undergoing a painful transition. Beijing is trying to steer the world’s second-largest economy out of a COVID-19 slump, the property crisis and
Former president Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) trip to China provides a pertinent reminder of why Taiwanese protested so vociferously against attempts to force through the cross-strait service trade agreement in 2014 and why, since Ma’s presidential election win in 2012, they have not voted in another Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) candidate. While the nation narrowly avoided tragedy — the treaty would have put Taiwan on the path toward the demobilization of its democracy, which Courtney Donovan Smith wrote about in the Taipei Times in “With the Sunflower movement Taiwan dodged a bullet” — Ma’s political swansong in China, which included fawning dithyrambs