A Turkish journalist faces a possible life sentences on charges he sent “subliminal messages” on television encouraging the July 15, 2016, Turkish coup attempt.
In Hungary, oligarchs loyal to the prime minister have gained control of much of the media after the leading independent newspaper was shut down and in Poland, a reporter is being threatened with a military trial for writing a book critical of Polish Minister of Defense Antoni Macierewicz.
These are trying and dangerous times for the media in countries that until recently had begun embracing democratic norms of free expression. News organizations are under attack in dramatic ways, as elected governments turn public outlets into their mouthpieces and try to silence critical voices.
Freedom House president Michael Abramowitz said that whether governments imprison journalists or flood the public sphere with misinformation, their goal is the same: “to ensure that negative coverage about the regime is marginalized and positive coverage dominates, especially for the plurality of citizens whose support you need to continue to rule.”
In undermining free expression, some of these governments have portrayed the press not as a pillar of a democratic society, but as a threat to it.
It is an issue of growing interest in the US, where US President Donald Trump condemns unfavorable coverage as “fake news” and brands journalists “enemies of the people.”
Lata Nott, executive director of the First Amendment Center at the Newseum Institute in Washington, said the threat in the US is not that press protections under the US Constitution’s First Amendment will be directly overturned, but that the administration’s continued attacks could sow so much distrust that attempts to undermine the media will become accepted.
She cited Trump’s suggestion earlier this year that the government could challenge the National Broadcasting Co’s broadcast license, after he was angered by a national security story.
“I think some of what Trump says is just bluster,” Nott said. “But there are some times where it becomes a tangible threat, and that’s what I worry about.”
In theory, Turkey, Hungary and Poland also guarantee freedom of speech and of the press. The principles were enshrined in the Polish and Hungarian constitutions following the collapse of communism in 1989, and in Turkey’s constitution decades earlier.
Despite those protections, many reporters in Turkey were jailed amid a crackdown following a military coup in 1980. In the 1990s, as Turkish forces clashed with Kurdish fighters, the government barred the media from criticizing its actions or producing stories deemed sympathetic to the Kurds. State security forces also killed several reporters covering the conflict.
Some progress came in the early 2000s, when Turkey embraced reforms in the hope of joining the EU, but matters deteriorated dramatically under Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan.
The attempted coup in 2016 intensified repression of journalists, as part of a broader purge by Erdogan that has targeted tens of thousands of people. More than 150 media organizations have been closed down.
Reporters Without Borders (RSF) Turkey representative Erol Onderoglu said that 122 reporters, writers and other media professionals are behind bars, many held in pretrial detention for more than a year.
“From day one, the government has used the coup attempt to go after its critics, and the spectrum of repression has gone well beyond the real suspects,” said Johann Bihr, who is also with RSF.
Among those imprisoned are journalist Ahmet Altan and his brother Mehmet, an academic. They face possible life sentences if found guilty of terrorism, attempting to overthrow the government and “giving subliminal messages in favor of a coup on television.”
The Turkish government insists that none of the journalists are on trial for their work, saying they are charged for aiding terror groups and other crimes.
Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orban has been in power since 2010, building what he calls an “illiberal state” modeled on Russia and Turkey. The main independent newspaper, Nepszabadsag, closed last year under political pressure and most surviving media groups are now controlled by Orban allies.
There are apparent attempts to intimidate reporters working for international outlets who have reported on a state-sponsored campaign against Hungarian-American investor and philanthropist George Soros.
Orban opposes immigration, particularly by Muslims, and has said that Soros wants to flood Europe with migrants.
Soros, a Holocaust survivor, has long promoted what he calls an “open society” and supports controlled migration. He funds the Central European University in Budapest and civic organizations, including some seen as critical of Orban.
A pro-government Web site recently published a list of eight journalists working for US-based news Web site Politico, and the Bloomberg and Reuters agencies, who it called “propagandists” for Soros.
Orban also asked the country’s spy agencies to investigate journalists and others involved in what he calls a “Soros network.”
Poland’s right-wing populist government, in power for two years, has been repeatedly condemned by the EU and others for eroding judicial independence. It has also taken firm control of the public media, purging journalists seen as too liberal or as opposing the government.
The Polish public media now operate as a propaganda tool for the ruling right-wing party.
The head of Polish state television has defended its approach, saying it is just acting as a “counterweight” to the critical coverage of the privately run stations.
The future for Poland’s private media companies is unclear, given signs that the ruling party hopes to reduce foreign ownership or weaken independent outlets enough so that the government can take control.
A reporter for the country’s leading newspaper, Gazeta Wyborcza, has been threatened with a trial by military court — and up to three years in prison — for writing a book alleging that associates of Macierewicz have links to Russian agents and mobsters.
Gazeta Wyborcza deputy editor Piotr Stasinski said that the government’s steps are adding to the newspaper’s problems as it struggles with declining print sales in the digital age, but he vowed to keep holding authorities to account as long as possible.
“We are going to be very critical of a government that destroys the constitutional system,” Stasinski said. “All we can do is speak truth to lies.”
Saudi Arabian largesse is flooding Egypt’s cultural scene, but the reception is mixed. Some welcome new “cooperation” between two regional powerhouses, while others fear a hostile takeover by Riyadh. In Cairo, historically the cultural capital of the Arab world, Egyptian Minister of Culture Nevine al-Kilany recently hosted Saudi Arabian General Entertainment Authority chairman Turki al-Sheikh. The deep-pocketed al-Sheikh has emerged as a Medici-like patron for Egypt’s cultural elite, courted by Cairo’s top talent to produce a slew of forthcoming films. A new three-way agreement between al-Sheikh, Kilany and United Media Services — a multi-media conglomerate linked to state intelligence that owns much of
The US and other countries should take concrete steps to confront the threats from Beijing to avoid war, US Representative Mario Diaz-Balart said in an interview with Voice of America on March 13. The US should use “every diplomatic economic tool at our disposal to treat China as what it is... to avoid war,” Diaz-Balart said. Giving an example of what the US could do, he said that it has to be more aggressive in its military sales to Taiwan. Actions by cross-party US lawmakers in the past few years such as meeting with Taiwanese officials in Washington and Taipei, and
The Republic of China (ROC) on Taiwan has no official diplomatic allies in the EU. With the exception of the Vatican, it has no official allies in Europe at all. This does not prevent the ROC — Taiwan — from having close relations with EU member states and other European countries. The exact nature of the relationship does bear revisiting, if only to clarify what is a very complicated and sensitive idea, the details of which leave considerable room for misunderstanding, misrepresentation and disagreement. Only this week, President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) received members of the European Parliament’s Delegation for Relations
Denmark’s “one China” policy more and more resembles Beijing’s “one China” principle. At least, this is how things appear. In recent interactions with the Danish state, such as applying for residency permits, a Taiwanese’s nationality would be listed as “China.” That designation occurs for a Taiwanese student coming to Denmark or a Danish citizen arriving in Denmark with, for example, their Taiwanese partner. Details of this were published on Sunday in an article in the Danish daily Berlingske written by Alexander Sjoberg and Tobias Reinwald. The pretext for this new practice is that Denmark does not recognize Taiwan as a state under