As the year draws to a close, there have been a couple of advances on the environmental front that deserve cheers — such as moves at central and local levels to expand restrictions on retailers from providing plastic shopping bags, disposable food packaging and eating utensils — but one effort to curb industrial penollution also serves as a reminder of how much more work lies ahead.
The central government this week approved the Kaohsiung City Government’s decision to ban factories along the Houjin (後勁溪) and Shihlong (獅龍溪) rivers and Cingpu Ditch (青埔溝) from using ammonium chloride, as well as control ammonia nitrogen emissions along the waterways, although the Legislative Yuan needs to amend the Water Pollution Control Act (水污染防治法) before the changes can be implemented.
This announcement came more than six months after Kaohsiung lost a lawsuit at the High Administrative Court over its fining of Advanced Semiconductor Engineering (ASE) for discharging toxic wastewater into the Houjin River between 2007 and 2013.
The lawsuit stemmed from an investigation into ASE dumping toxic water into Houjin in early December 2013. That discovery led the city to fine the company NT$102 million (US$3.4 million at the current exchange rate); it also triggered protests against ASE, which led its chairman to promise the firm would donate up to NT$3 billion over 30 years to promote environmental protection, even though the company argued the discharge was a once-off incident.
However, the Environmental Protection Administration’s (EPA) pollution management database and probes by the Kaohsiung Environmental Protection Bureau showed the firm had long been a serial offender.
ASE was not the only Kaohsiung company caught dumping that month: Lian-yi Industrial Co used pipes connected to the rainwater sewer system to dispose of wastewater that was even more toxic than ASE’s.
Cynics were quick to ask if Kaohsiung officials felt the need to act following the release of the documentary Beyond Beauty: Taiwan From Above (看見台灣) in November 2013, a film that showed the extent of the Houjin River’s damaged state, as its waters ran red.
More than four years later, the city and central governments are finally moving to halt further damage to waterways passing near industrial zones in Kaohsiung — waters that are also used to irrigate more than 1,600 hectares of farmland — but the proposed measures are still at least two years away from taking effect.
The two governments said they want laws amended so that the changes can be implemented by 2020, but as we have seen with the debate over amending the Mining Act (礦業法) during the current legislative session, wanting and achieving are very different things.
The changes would only cover pollution of Kaohsiung’s waterways — the Kaohsiung bureau blithely noted that Formosa Plastic Group’s (FPG) plant in Renwu District (仁武) pumps its wastewater out to sea. That is not reassuring, given the plant’s record. While its wastewater is processed at a separate facility before being released into the ocean, the EPA in 2009 found that soil and groundwater near the plant had been polluted by benzene and seven other pollutants at concentrations more than 20 times the government’s maximum standard, and levels of 1 ,2-dichloroethane were more than 30,000 times the standard.
This is believed to have been caused by a discharge from the plant in 2006, although FPG has always denied responsibility and was never fined or charged over it.
Two studies released this year linked the 2006 pollution to an increased incidence of kidney problems and related illnesses among residents of boroughs affected by the contamination, a link contested by FPG.
Given the damage such pollutants can cause to humans, we all should be worried about what is in industrial wastewater that is discharged into the sea. If Kaohsiung officials do not see it as their job, the central government certainly should, and take measures to ensure such discharges are truly pollutant free.
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
The past few months have seen tremendous strides in India’s journey to develop a vibrant semiconductor and electronics ecosystem. The nation’s established prowess in information technology (IT) has earned it much-needed revenue and prestige across the globe. Now, through the convergence of engineering talent, supportive government policies, an expanding market and technologically adaptive entrepreneurship, India is striving to become part of global electronics and semiconductor supply chains. Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Vision of “Make in India” and “Design in India” has been the guiding force behind the government’s incentive schemes that span skilling, design, fabrication, assembly, testing and packaging, and
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.