Aircraft from China’s People’s Liberation Army (PLA) Air Force carried out yet another military exercise on Monday last week, flying over the Bashi Channel into the West Pacific Ocean east of Taiwan and then passing over the Miyako Strait before returning to their base.
All of this long-range training mission activity is probably so that PLA pilots can get combat-oriented training. China possibly also hopes that these frequent missions will numb Taiwan and other neighboring nations until they accept these missions as fact.
In concert with the PLA Air Force’s actions, the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) posted a two-minute video featuring a group of aircraft conducting an “island encirclement patrol” on Weibo earlier this month.
Using battlefield footage in their propaganda is nothing new for the PLA. The Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) troops were often exposed to the CCP’s propaganda warfare during the Chinese Civil War.
This latest video is noteworthy, because all the PLA’s bombers and fighters shown in the video have appeared before, and the footage, which was shot at different times, was edited later and combined with a sensational headline.
Promoted by the military’s media, the wu mao dang (五毛黨, 50-Cent Army: Internet users who are paid to support the government’s propaganda online), and the so-called “Internet water army” (網路水軍, ghostwriters who are paid to post comments, the video immediately received a lot of attention).
Although military researchers could easily see through the video and its comments, which mixed fact with falsehoods, it caused an instant effect in Taiwan after being hyped up by people with ulterior motives.
For the CCP, presenting concrete military activities to Chinese via video boosts morale. The online media’s broadcast of these frequent flying missions could also build the false impression that the PLA is strong enough to surround Taiwan, thus creating chaos among Taiwanese and perhaps even doubts about the nation’s military strength.
This shows that, apart from testing Taiwan’s air defense, combat management and ground logistics capabilities, the CCP is using propaganda to rattle Taiwanese. This kind of approach is likely to become more frequent.
In 1999, PLA colonels Qiao Liang (喬良) and Wang Xiangsui (王湘穗) published a book titled Unrestricted Warfare (超限戰), attracting much international attention. It emphasized that the model of future warfare would surpass conventional means. With today’s digital technology, unrestricted warfare will have even more variation.
Furthermore, in 2003, the PLA’s General Political Department proposed the concept of “three warfares” (三戰): public opinion, psychological warfare and legal warfare. The CCP also proposed that the area of media and propaganda will be a key future battlefield and a domain contested by all sides.
Most countries have strategies to compete with their rivals, but try to do so without breaking relationships. Since governments are cautious with regard to military actions, propaganda is a more suitable weapon.
As cybertechnology improves, countries are focussing more on digital propaganda warfare combined with advanced digital technology. This new domain will inevitably be the next major battlefield.
Will Taiwan be able to seize the opportunity first, cooperate with civil military experts to clarify rumors and then seize the initiative to take the lead in digital propaganda warfare?
Lin Ying-yu is an assistant professor in the Institute of Strategic and International Affairs at National Chung Cheng University.
Translated by Eddy Chang
Could Asia be on the verge of a new wave of nuclear proliferation? A look back at the early history of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), which recently celebrated its 75th anniversary, illuminates some reasons for concern in the Indo-Pacific today. US Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin recently described NATO as “the most powerful and successful alliance in history,” but the organization’s early years were not without challenges. At its inception, the signing of the North Atlantic Treaty marked a sea change in American strategic thinking. The United States had been intent on withdrawing from Europe in the years following
My wife and I spent the week in the interior of Taiwan where Shuyuan spent her childhood. In that town there is a street that functions as an open farmer’s market. Walk along that street, as Shuyuan did yesterday, and it is next to impossible to come home empty-handed. Some mangoes that looked vaguely like others we had seen around here ended up on our table. Shuyuan told how she had bought them from a little old farmer woman from the countryside who said the mangoes were from a very old tree she had on her property. The big surprise
The issue of China’s overcapacity has drawn greater global attention recently, with US Secretary of the Treasury Janet Yellen urging Beijing to address its excess production in key industries during her visit to China last week. Meanwhile in Brussels, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen last week said that Europe must have a tough talk with China on its perceived overcapacity and unfair trade practices. The remarks by Yellen and Von der Leyen come as China’s economy is undergoing a painful transition. Beijing is trying to steer the world’s second-largest economy out of a COVID-19 slump, the property crisis and
Former president Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) trip to China provides a pertinent reminder of why Taiwanese protested so vociferously against attempts to force through the cross-strait service trade agreement in 2014 and why, since Ma’s presidential election win in 2012, they have not voted in another Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) candidate. While the nation narrowly avoided tragedy — the treaty would have put Taiwan on the path toward the demobilization of its democracy, which Courtney Donovan Smith wrote about in the Taipei Times in “With the Sunflower movement Taiwan dodged a bullet” — Ma’s political swansong in China, which included fawning dithyrambs