Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) has ascended China’s political mountaintop and is imposing his will on both the Chinese Communist Party and the Chinese public. His time spent in the US did not turn him into a liberal: Under him, the People’s Republic of China (PRC) has taken a sharply authoritarian direction.
What the PRC does at home no doubt concerns freedom-loving people around the world. Nevertheless, it comes as no surprise and China remains far freer today than during Mao Zedong’s (毛澤東) rule.
However, Beijing’s domestic policies matter more when applied to nominally autonomous Chinese territories, most notably Hong Kong. The latter is not only the economically freest land on Earth, it also is governed by law, not men, and protects basic liberties. However, that appears to be changing, for the worse.
Seized by Great Britain from the decrepit Chinese Empire, the territory was returned in 1997. Beijing promised to preserve its unique characteristics as a special administrative region (SAR).
Little changed for many years. However, the 2014 “Umbrella movement” featured youth-driven demands for the impossible: democratic selection of the SAR’s political leaders. Protests ended with a political impasse.
Intrusions in Hong Kong’s autonomy have since increased. In 2015, several publishers critical of the PRC were arrested by Chinese authorities in seeming violations of international law.
Last year, two pro-independence activists were blocked from taking their seats in the Hong Kong Legislative Council after highlighting their contempt for Beijing while taking their oath of office. The Chinese National People’s Congress joined the controversy and Hong Kong authorities challenged the election of another four political activists.
In July, Xi visited Hong Kong to mark the 20th anniversary of China’s takeover and made clear his government would not tolerate support for independence. In August, three leaders of the “Umbrella movement” were sentenced to prison for their role in protests three years before.
Now the Legislative Council is expected to approve legislation pushed by Beijing to criminalize showing disrespect to China’s national anthem, which is played at Hong Kong sporting events. Participants at soccer matches have booed, chanted and waved banners against the PRC. The measure provides for a prison term of up to three years imprisonment.
Exactly how the measure would be enforced is unclear. Hong Kong would face the embarrassing question of whether it is willing to jail its people for what is pure free speech.
Much will be at stake in how it answers.
As China grows stronger, it needs to learn the value of forbearance. Beijing has the power to do most anything that it wants not in Hong Kong. However, prudence counsels for less, rather than more.
First, Hong Kong is the canary in the mine for Taiwan. Most Taiwanese, especially young people, do not identify with the PRC. Why would they choose to be ruled from Beijing?
To accept even a looser connection would require trust in the central authorities. However, what is occurring in Hong Kong is not reassuring. With a robust democracy, Taiwanese have even more to lose.
Second, the status of Hong Kong is an indicator of Beijing’s respect for international law. London never had the means to enforce its agreement with the PRC over Hong Kong’s return. However, the resulting pact was a symbol of China’s maturity. To ostentatiously toss aside the SAR’s most important liberties would demonstrate a worrisome mix of arrogance and impatience, sure to concern the PRC’s neighbors.
Third, targeting symbolic opposition rather than substantive resistance guarantees organized disobedience with public support. Plenty of Hong Kong residents oppose independence, or at least the pursuit of independence against the PRC’s wishes. However, they also believe in allowing people to express their views freely. Going after those deemed disrespectful toward China would be a nightmare.
Fourth, Beijing needs to fight for the hearts and minds of Hong Kong residents. Repression makes the PRC even less attractive, especially to young Hong Kongers.
Legal dissent is the equivalent of a popular steam valve, releasing public pressure. China has sufficient security forces to “win” any confrontation in the streets. However, coercion and violence would be devastating to the PRC’s international reputation.
With great power comes responsibility. So it is with China in Hong Kong.
Officials not used to opposition in Beijing bridle at criticism further from home. However, instead of attempting to stifle dissent in Hong Kong, they should channel criticism to more productive ends, while demonstrating why the PRC is an attractive overlord. Confrontation will benefit no one.
Doug Bandow is a senior fellow at the Cato Institute and a former special assistant to former US president Ronald Reagan.
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
The past few months have seen tremendous strides in India’s journey to develop a vibrant semiconductor and electronics ecosystem. The nation’s established prowess in information technology (IT) has earned it much-needed revenue and prestige across the globe. Now, through the convergence of engineering talent, supportive government policies, an expanding market and technologically adaptive entrepreneurship, India is striving to become part of global electronics and semiconductor supply chains. Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Vision of “Make in India” and “Design in India” has been the guiding force behind the government’s incentive schemes that span skilling, design, fabrication, assembly, testing and packaging, and
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.