Tue, Dec 12, 2017 - Page 9 News List

Mob law could hold the key to Weinstein case

By Colleen Long  /  AP, NEW YORK

The federal anti-racketeering law has been used since the late 1970s to bring down mob bosses. Could it be used to prosecute Harvey Weinstein?

Lawyers for six actresses who say they were sexually assaulted by the movie producer on Wednesday filed a lawsuit in New York arguing that Weinstein was, essentially, a racketeer who used a legion of assistants, casting agents, security firms, gossip writers and others to supply himself with a steady stream of unwilling sexual partners and silence their complaints.

Their anti-racketeering suit was filed in a civil court, but it prompted discussions about whether prosecutors could make a similar criminal case.

Maybe, but it would not be easy, said Robert Blakey, a professor emeritus at the University of Notre Dame law school who helped write the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (RICO).

“It would take imagination and intestinal fortitude,” he said. “Prosecutors have been singularly lacking in both when it comes to women making complaints of sexual assault against powerful men.”

The law was drafted to bring down organized crime, but it is not limited to it, Blakey said.

It has been used by prosecutors to go after rule-breaking Wall Street firms and corrupt government contractors. Federal prosecutors are currently using it to battle alleged bribery in global soccer in a ongoing trial in Brooklyn.

However, a criminal anti-racketeering case also has many hurdles, Blakey said.

Federal prosecutors would have to prove that a criminal enterprise existed and affected interstate commerce, and that the defendant was associated with and engaged in racketeering, he said, adding that it would also have to be brought within five years of the conspiracy ending.

The racketeering statute is a federal law, although some states — like New York and California — have similar state laws.

The women suing Weinstein in civil court say the “Weinstein sexual enterprise” consisted of a long list of people who either enabled Weinstein’s assaults or covered them up.

Their claims were based partly on reporting by the New York Times and the New Yorker, both of which published exposes saying that Weinstein took extraordinary steps to conceal complaints, including hiring security firms to investigate reporters working on possible stories and working with other media to discredit women who might come forward.

“The goal of the [anti-racketeering] claim is to ensure not only do we get the head of the enterprise, but also those around him who enabled his conduct, whether they tampered with witnesses or destroyed evidence after the fact, or even delivered the women to him,” said Beth Fegan, the lead lawyer on the civil suit.

Weinstein’s attorneys, Blair Berk and Ben Brafman, said in a statement that all the allegations of sexual assault against him are false.

“Mr Weinstein has never at any time committed an act of sexual assault and it is wrong and irresponsible to conflate claims of impolitic behavior or consensual sexual contact later regretted, with an untrue claim of criminal conduct. There is a wide canyon between mere allegation and truth and we are confident that any sober calculation of the facts will prove no legal wrongdoing occurred. Nonetheless, to those offended by Mr Weinstein’s behavior, he remains deeply apologetic,” the statement said.

This story has been viewed 2193 times.

Comments will be moderated. Keep comments relevant to the article. Remarks containing abusive and obscene language, personal attacks of any kind or promotion will be removed and the user banned. Final decision will be at the discretion of the Taipei Times.

TOP top