When Vigdis Finnboga-dottir, a divorced single mother, ran for president of Iceland in 1980, women made up only 5 percent of parliamentarians in the Nordic country.
“I never thought I would win,” she said, sitting in the modernist architectural splendor of the University of Iceland multicultural institute that bears her name in Reykjavik. “I just wanted to prove a woman could run.”
However, in August of that year, she became the first female elected head of state anywhere in the world. Reflecting on the impact of her 16-year tenure, she has no time for false modesty.
Illustration: Constance Chou
“If I may say so, because I hear it all the time, it changed everything,” said the 87-year-old. “Women thought, if she can, I can. In my advanced age, women still thank me for being a role model.”
In this small nation, there is a near-unquestioned conviction based on decades of evidence that electing women to positions of power benefits women and families.
At a time when American women, galvanized by the election of US President Donald Trump, are showing unprecedented interest in entering the political arena themselves, Iceland can provide both a road map and a promise for what is possible.
Iceland’s lesson for the US is clear: When women win elections, everyone wins.
“There is absolutely no doubt that there is an equivalency between more gender-balanced political representation and better policies for women,” Icelandic Women’s Rights Association executive manager Brynhildur Heidar said. “Parental leave, day care, the gender pay gap — none of these were seen as major issues before women ran for parliament.”
After Finnbogadottir made history in 1980, female political participation in Iceland soared, leading it to become the most gender-equal parliament in the world among countries without a quota system.
Even after a sharp drop following a snap election in October, women still make up 38.6 percent of the governing body — and this month feminist Katrin Jakobs-dottir emerged its new prime minister.
It is no coincidence that last year Iceland was ranked the most gender equal country in the world by the World Economic Forum — for the ninth time — and The Economist recently named it the world’s best place for working women.
By contrast, after last year’s election, the US dropped from 52nd to a dismal 104th in the world for women’s political representation. Today, women hold just 19.6 percent of the seats in the US Congress — 21.0 percent in the US Senate and 19.3 percent in the US House of Representatives.
The US also remains the only industrialized nation that does not guarantee workers paid maternity leave. Full-time childcare costs 85 percent of the median rent in some regions, and the country has the worst maternal death rate in the developed world.
It is injustices like these that have stoked growing political activism among liberal women in the US.
Emerge America, which aims to boost the number of Democratic women running for office, has reported an 87 percent increase in applications to its training programs.
Emily’s List, an organization dedicated to helping elect pro-choice Democratic women, said more than 22,000 women have expressed interest in running for office since the election — up from less than 1,000 women in the year before.
In Virginia, the 100-member House of Delegates will jump from from 17 women members to 28 next year, including the first two Latinas to hold seats in the Virginia assembly.
“There is definitely momentum,” She Should Run founder Erin Loos Cutraro said. “There’s a sense of urgency among women to both fix what is broken and provide their experience and perspective to create healthier government.”
Research supports this urgency: A paper by Georgetown University political scientist Michele Swers found that liberal female legislators cosponsored an average of 10.6 bills related to women’s health — an average of 5.3 more than their liberal male colleagues.
Incidentally, a Stanford University study also showed that female US Congress members simply get more stuff done — passing, on average, twice as many bills as male legislators in one analyzed session of Congress.
The link between legislators and female-friendly and family-friendly policies is long accepted in Iceland, Heidar said.
“From our perspective there is no doubt that women in parliament drive policy for women,” she said.
A historical look at key policies in the nation appears to back this up. In the 1990s, full-time, highly subsidized daycare became available for all children aged two and older after the election of several parliamentarians from the women-centered political party Women’s Alliance and the election of Finnbogadottir the decade before.
In 2000, by which time a third of MPs were women, a new law introduced nine months of parental leave, which gave both mothers and fathers three months of paid leave each, plus an additional three months to split between them. At the time it was the longest amount of paid leave given to fathers anywhere in the world.
“It changed society overnight,” said Icelandic Federation of Trade secretary general Olafur Stephen-sen, who is a father of two.
The next big push came after the 2008 financial crisis, which saw Iceland’s banking system collapse, creating a severe economic depression. In the election that followed in 2009, women took 43 percent of the seats, and Johanna Sigurdardottir became the country’s first female prime minister — and the world’s first openly lesbian head of government.
“Because things were such a mess in 2009, the increase in women went almost unnoticed,” Heidar said. “But we went from being a ‘normal’ democracy to a gender-equal parliament overnight — it was a fantastic victory.”
The country briefly achieved gender parity last year, 101 years after Icelandic women first got the vote.
In the years that followed, new laws introduced quotas for women on company boards, a ban on strip clubs and the purchase of sex, the removal of perpetrators of domestic violence from the family, and a recent push to make employers prove equal pay.
Female political representation empowers other women at the top of other fields too, said Sigurdur Bjork Gudmundsdottir, Reykjavik’s first female chief of police. Since ascending to the post in 2014, she has made violence against women and girls a priority.
So can women in the US take any messages of hope from this pioneering micro-state of 330,000 people?
Iceland’s former Women’s History Archive director Audur Styrkarsdottir can see some parallels between the Women’s March on Washington — which saw 500,000 people descend on the US capital and another 1.5 million join them in hundreds of cities across the world — and Iceland’s 1975 Women’s Day Off, which experts cite as a momentous event in the fight for women’s rights.
On that day, a fifth of the country’s female population, about 25,000 women, gathered on the streets of Reykjavik to protest low pay, lack of political representation and domestic drudgery. At the same time, an estimated 90 percent of Iceland’s female population went on an all-out professional and domestic strike throughout the country.
“It was a turning point for everybody,” Styrkarssdottir said.
If the tiny nation has anything to teach the US, it is this: Do not give up.
“Just keep going,” Styrkarsdottir said. “Icelandic women aren’t here because it was handed to us — we had to fight all the way, and we are still fighting.”
Even in a country with as proud a heritage of gender equality as Iceland, progress can falter. As well as the drop in female politicians in the last election, the gender pay gap is still 16 percent. Professions remain starkly gendered, and the number of men taking paternity leave has been falling, from 90 percent in 2008 to 74 percent in 2016, after the country lowered the amount of money fathers can collect following the economic crisis.
Iceland is lucky, perhaps, that it has champions like Finnbogadottir to encourage a younger army of women to carry on the fight.
“I think this current result is a coincidence and I think next time it will be better,” she said, steely-eyed.
While equality in political representation is not mandated here, it has come to be expected, she added.
“It is not a law, but it is what is morally acceptable. We need women in power — in society, when women have a voice, everything changes,” she said.
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
The past few months have seen tremendous strides in India’s journey to develop a vibrant semiconductor and electronics ecosystem. The nation’s established prowess in information technology (IT) has earned it much-needed revenue and prestige across the globe. Now, through the convergence of engineering talent, supportive government policies, an expanding market and technologically adaptive entrepreneurship, India is striving to become part of global electronics and semiconductor supply chains. Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Vision of “Make in India” and “Design in India” has been the guiding force behind the government’s incentive schemes that span skilling, design, fabrication, assembly, testing and packaging, and
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
As former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) wrapped up his visit to the People’s Republic of China, he received his share of attention. Certainly, the trip must be seen within the full context of Ma’s life, that is, his eight-year presidency, the Sunflower movement and his failed Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement, as well as his eight years as Taipei mayor with its posturing, accusations of money laundering, and ups and downs. Through all that, basic questions stand out: “What drives Ma? What is his end game?” Having observed and commented on Ma for decades, it is all ironically reminiscent of former US president Harry