Some retired generals have been convicted of betraying their country by spying for China and developing a network in the armed forces on behalf of the Chinese People’s Liberation Army, yet they can continue collecting their pensions from the Taiwan government.
This alarming situation arises because of Article 34 of the Act of Military Service for Officers and Noncommissioned Officers of the Armed Forces (陸海空軍軍官士官服役條例), which stipulates four conditions under which retired officers lose their pensions: if they lose their citizenship; if they are convicted of subversion or treason, or of having committed acts of corruption on active duty; if they are sentenced to death or life imprisonment; if they die.
Only subversion, treason or corruption charges could lead to their pensions being canceled.
The Republic of China (ROC) Constitution defines Taiwan’s only enemy state, China, as “the mainland area,” not a foreign country. If China is not a foreign country, then logically it cannot be an enemy state, which prevents the most serious offense, treason, from being applied in cases involving China.
The courts hearing spy cases have therefore all applied the National Security Act (國家安全法), which imposes much lighter criminal penalties, which do not lead to the convicted officers’ pensions being canceled.
Luckily, the legislature’s Judiciary and Organic Laws and Statutes Committee has approved an amendment to the Criminal Code proposed by Democratic Progressive Party Legislator Wang Ding-yu (王定宇) that would make the offense of treason under the Criminal Code applicable to people who spy for China.
The articles on treason in the Criminal Code are worded in such a way that they only apply to cases involving foreign states, but Wang’s amendment would make them more widely applicable by modifying “foreign states” to “foreign states or enemies.”
“Enemy” is the key word in Wang’s proposal and it is based on Article 10 of the Criminal Code of the Armed Forces (陸海空軍刑法), which defines “enemy” as denoting any country or organization engaging in warfare or armed confrontation with the ROC.
This definition of “enemy” was added by an amendment made during former president Chen Shui-bian’s (陳水扁) terms in office.
The legislature’s Web site said three reasons were cited to justify passage of this amendment. First, the Criminal Code of the Armed Forces frequently used the word “enemy” as an element of criminal offenses, but without defining it precisely.
Second, “enemy” denotes any country or organization engaging in warfare or armed confrontation with the ROC.
Third, armed confrontation means that there is a country or political entity that is in a state of armed confrontation with this country, even though there is no actual armed conflict.
It is clear that Chen was aware of the difficulty of applying the offense of treason because “China is not a foreign country” and saw the need to establish a clear definition.
It should also be noted that this concept of “enemy” originates from Article 3, Section 3 of the US constitution, which says: “Treason against the United States, shall consist only in levying war against them, or in adhering to their enemies, giving them aid and comfort.”
The key word “enemy” in the US constitution is not restricted to foreign countries, it includes rebellious armies within the US.
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) is keen on the idea of a “peace agreement,” saying that the state of civil war has not yet been ended.
By using the word “enemies” in place of “enemy states,” Wang’s amendment incorporates the KMT’s civil war idea, so why would the KMT oppose it?
Christian Fan Jiang is a media commentator.
Translated by Julian Clegg
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
The past few months have seen tremendous strides in India’s journey to develop a vibrant semiconductor and electronics ecosystem. The nation’s established prowess in information technology (IT) has earned it much-needed revenue and prestige across the globe. Now, through the convergence of engineering talent, supportive government policies, an expanding market and technologically adaptive entrepreneurship, India is striving to become part of global electronics and semiconductor supply chains. Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Vision of “Make in India” and “Design in India” has been the guiding force behind the government’s incentive schemes that span skilling, design, fabrication, assembly, testing and packaging, and
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
As former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) wrapped up his visit to the People’s Republic of China, he received his share of attention. Certainly, the trip must be seen within the full context of Ma’s life, that is, his eight-year presidency, the Sunflower movement and his failed Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement, as well as his eight years as Taipei mayor with its posturing, accusations of money laundering, and ups and downs. Through all that, basic questions stand out: “What drives Ma? What is his end game?” Having observed and commented on Ma for decades, it is all ironically reminiscent of former US president Harry