Divide-and-conquer strategies have long played a pivotal role in China’s “united front” tactics aimed at bringing Taiwan into its fold.
However, while Beijing’s approach has focused more on grooming political parties, politicians and business leaders as its “proxies” in Taiwan to promote its unification propaganda while ignoring those whose political ideology it deemed hostile toward China, recent cases suggest that Beijing has shifted its approach, trying to engage all Taiwanese in general as its top priority.
The change signals that, in line with Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) remarks at the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) 19th National Congress in October, promoting a sense of shared identity and winning Taiwanese over by any means available, as well as infiltrating and making political arrests, now form the basis of Beijing’s Taiwan policy.
Less than a month after the congress concluded, Taiwanese have already witnessed how Beijing’s two-handed strategy could be put in practice.
The first Cross-Strait Student Baseball League hosted in China’s Shenzhen from Friday last week is a prime example of how Beijing is attempting to realize Xi’s hopes of promoting a sense of shared identity and winning Taiwanese over.
Baseball being a popular sport in Taiwan, the league understandably attracted many Taiwanese, from elementary-school pupils to college students.
China’s Taiwan Affairs Office Minister Zhang Zhijun (張志軍) opened the league’s finals on Friday standing in front of a banner that read “both sides of the [Taiwan] Strait are one family.”
Cross-straits Baseball Exchange and Cooperation Committee chief executive Xu Yong (徐勇) expressed his hope that through baseball, “more Taiwanese youth will be attracted to visit and better understand China.”
The competition might have been friendly and innocent, but the banner exposed China’s political agenda. Making an emotional appeal to Taiwanese, it was a narrowly concealed restatement of Beijing’s “one China” principle.
Beijing hoped the phrase would draw Taiwanese to develop emotional bonds with China, but it is a politically loaded phrase that was first introduced by Xi in 2013 in a meeting with former Taiwanese vice president Vincent Siew (蕭萬長) at the Boao Forum for Asia in China’s Hainan Province; the phrase was subsequently formally listed at the “2014 Workshop on Taiwan Affairs” of the National Committee of the Chinese People’s Political Consultative Conference.
The meaning of Xi’s directive on making political arrests is evident in the case of Taiwanese human rights advocate Lee Ming-che (李明哲), who on Tuesday last week was sentenced to five years in prison by a court in Yueyang in China’s Hunan Province for “subversion of state power” over claims that he used online discussion groups to disseminate information and articles attacking the Chinese government.
Going by Taipei prosecutors’ confirmation on Sunday that an investigation is under way into the National Immigration Agency’s procurement of information services and systems that might have been compromised by Chinese-made software and equipment, China has not taken a break from its attempts to infiltrate Taiwan.
These cases demonstrate that China’s divide-and-conquer strategy and its “united front” tactics — whether seemingly harmless sports events and people-to-people exchanges or clandestine activities to infiltrate Taiwanese society — have become more intricate and are reaching ever deeper.
The question is whether the government has contingency plans to defend against Beijing’s ever-changing “united front” tactics.
Could Asia be on the verge of a new wave of nuclear proliferation? A look back at the early history of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), which recently celebrated its 75th anniversary, illuminates some reasons for concern in the Indo-Pacific today. US Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin recently described NATO as “the most powerful and successful alliance in history,” but the organization’s early years were not without challenges. At its inception, the signing of the North Atlantic Treaty marked a sea change in American strategic thinking. The United States had been intent on withdrawing from Europe in the years following
My wife and I spent the week in the interior of Taiwan where Shuyuan spent her childhood. In that town there is a street that functions as an open farmer’s market. Walk along that street, as Shuyuan did yesterday, and it is next to impossible to come home empty-handed. Some mangoes that looked vaguely like others we had seen around here ended up on our table. Shuyuan told how she had bought them from a little old farmer woman from the countryside who said the mangoes were from a very old tree she had on her property. The big surprise
The issue of China’s overcapacity has drawn greater global attention recently, with US Secretary of the Treasury Janet Yellen urging Beijing to address its excess production in key industries during her visit to China last week. Meanwhile in Brussels, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen last week said that Europe must have a tough talk with China on its perceived overcapacity and unfair trade practices. The remarks by Yellen and Von der Leyen come as China’s economy is undergoing a painful transition. Beijing is trying to steer the world’s second-largest economy out of a COVID-19 slump, the property crisis and
Former president Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) trip to China provides a pertinent reminder of why Taiwanese protested so vociferously against attempts to force through the cross-strait service trade agreement in 2014 and why, since Ma’s presidential election win in 2012, they have not voted in another Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) candidate. While the nation narrowly avoided tragedy — the treaty would have put Taiwan on the path toward the demobilization of its democracy, which Courtney Donovan Smith wrote about in the Taipei Times in “With the Sunflower movement Taiwan dodged a bullet” — Ma’s political swansong in China, which included fawning dithyrambs