Special envoy to APEC James Soong’s (宋楚瑜) “natural” interaction with the leaders of other nations in the Asia-Pacific at the two-day APEC leaders’ summit in Da Nang, Vietnam, was given blanket coverage by domestic media. On his return to Taiwan, Soong headed to the Presidential Office to report on his “considerable diplomatic achievements” at the summit.
What follows are some thoughts on Soong’s suitability as Taiwan’s envoy to APEC, as well as reflections on Taiwan’s wider diplomatic strategy.
First, was Soong the right person to reach a breakthrough within the international community?
APEC is one of the few international forums in which Taiwan is able to participate relatively freely. One of the aims for Taiwan when taking part, aside from using it as an opportunity to build upon natural friendships, is to achieve substantial interaction with other countries. In this respect, Soong spared no effort.
However, as Soong does not hold executive powers and has no ability to influence Presidential Office policy, even if he had wanted to reach a diplomatic breakthrough or perhaps participate in a regional economic cooperation group, this would have first required high-level approval from the government.
Second, is Soong a defender of Taiwan’s values? To answer this question, one must first ask: Are Soong’s personal endorsements and his political ideology, both past and present, in line with majority public opinion?
Does he represent President Tsai Ing-wen’s (蔡英文) administration? Or is he just a more internationalist version of those politicians who believe that stability and economic growth should be prioritized at the expense of everything else?
If the 2015 meeting between President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) and Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) already left the public fearful, then at a more important international forum such as APEC, it is all the more likely that a politician who possesses a conservative, party-state ideology would pass on the chance to make Taiwan’s voice heard on the international stage.
Third, in terms of lowering tensions across the Strait, what can Soong offer?
Former president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) and Tsai have both regarded Soong as being open to cooperating with the pan-green camp, while at the same time being largely acceptable to Beijing.
However, Soong has achieved little in terms of changing Beijing’s indifference, or downright hostility, to the Democratic Progressive Party or Taiwanese public opinion.
This has been Beijing’s consistent stance toward Taiwan and is reflected in the measures it has adopted. Put another way, even if the Chinese Communist Party “designates” or favors a certain political party or individual as the sole “window to cross-strait relations,” it is by no means certain that the Taiwanese public will find this acceptable.
Finally, there is the question of what this means for electoral prospects.
The Tsai administration has shown ample goodwill to Soong by making government resources available.
However, Soong’s People First Party, both in and outside the legislature, sides more with the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) on many issues. This is perhaps based on his stance of essentially being in “perpetual opposition,” but it does arouse suspicion.
It at least appears that he is taking advantage of the stage the Tsai administration has given him to gain exposure, which will benefit his party come the next election, rather than being sincere in his cooperation with the government and trying to solve some of the country’s predicaments.
After the media attention subsides, there remains something about this year’s APEC meeting that the public will fail to find reassurance in.
It is unclear to many of us why we are forced to continuously go through these cycles of hand-wringing and groveling, hoping for some kind of acquiescence or tacit approval by Beijing, before we can achieve any form of vague, ambiguous room for maneuver in international forums.
Jethro Wang is an MA student at National Taiwan University’s Graduate Institute of National Development.
Translated by Edward Jones and Paul Cooper
Saudi Arabian largesse is flooding Egypt’s cultural scene, but the reception is mixed. Some welcome new “cooperation” between two regional powerhouses, while others fear a hostile takeover by Riyadh. In Cairo, historically the cultural capital of the Arab world, Egyptian Minister of Culture Nevine al-Kilany recently hosted Saudi Arabian General Entertainment Authority chairman Turki al-Sheikh. The deep-pocketed al-Sheikh has emerged as a Medici-like patron for Egypt’s cultural elite, courted by Cairo’s top talent to produce a slew of forthcoming films. A new three-way agreement between al-Sheikh, Kilany and United Media Services — a multi-media conglomerate linked to state intelligence that owns much of
The US and other countries should take concrete steps to confront the threats from Beijing to avoid war, US Representative Mario Diaz-Balart said in an interview with Voice of America on March 13. The US should use “every diplomatic economic tool at our disposal to treat China as what it is... to avoid war,” Diaz-Balart said. Giving an example of what the US could do, he said that it has to be more aggressive in its military sales to Taiwan. Actions by cross-party US lawmakers in the past few years such as meeting with Taiwanese officials in Washington and Taipei, and
Denmark’s “one China” policy more and more resembles Beijing’s “one China” principle. At least, this is how things appear. In recent interactions with the Danish state, such as applying for residency permits, a Taiwanese’s nationality would be listed as “China.” That designation occurs for a Taiwanese student coming to Denmark or a Danish citizen arriving in Denmark with, for example, their Taiwanese partner. Details of this were published on Sunday in an article in the Danish daily Berlingske written by Alexander Sjoberg and Tobias Reinwald. The pretext for this new practice is that Denmark does not recognize Taiwan as a state under
The Republic of China (ROC) on Taiwan has no official diplomatic allies in the EU. With the exception of the Vatican, it has no official allies in Europe at all. This does not prevent the ROC — Taiwan — from having close relations with EU member states and other European countries. The exact nature of the relationship does bear revisiting, if only to clarify what is a very complicated and sensitive idea, the details of which leave considerable room for misunderstanding, misrepresentation and disagreement. Only this week, President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) received members of the European Parliament’s Delegation for Relations