Flogging an idea
There has been a great deal of debate over whether the government should introduce harsher penalties — including flogging — for those convicted of drunk driving, sexual assault, harming children and other serious offenses.
I would suggest that it would be preferable to reduce the death penalty to flogging, rather than elevate a lesser penalty to flogging.
When discussing the question of flogging, many people would immediately think of Singapore and the 1993 case of US national Michael Fay.
Fay, who was 18 years old at the time and an expatriate student who had moved to Singapore with his parents, was charged with theft on suspicion of vandalizing cars, breaking their windows and daubing them with graffiti.
In addition to being fined, Fay was sentenced to six strokes of the cane.
Following an appeal for clemency by then-US president Bill Clinton, the flogging was reduced to four strokes, but not revoked.
The case brought international attention and notoriety to Singapore’s punishment by flogging.
However, there is a cultural element to the Singaporean public’s support for flogging. Many Singaporean parents use a cane to punish their children, since administering corporal punishment to minors is not forbidden under Singaporean law. Taiwanese law prohibits this.
There is also a historical basis. Singapore’s system of flogging has its origins in British criminal law, which used to administer flogging for crimes, including theft and sexual assault, as a way to deter others from committing similar offenses.
Under Singaporean law, more than 40 criminal offenses are punishable by flogging. These include kidnapping, violent robbery, use of illegal narcotics, destruction of public property and sexual assault.
Perhaps there is not wide support within Taiwan’s government to introduce flogging as a punishment, but it is the first priority of any government to ensure that its citizens feel safe.
Surely that is not too much to ask.
Chiu Shih-chang
Taipei
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
The past few months have seen tremendous strides in India’s journey to develop a vibrant semiconductor and electronics ecosystem. The nation’s established prowess in information technology (IT) has earned it much-needed revenue and prestige across the globe. Now, through the convergence of engineering talent, supportive government policies, an expanding market and technologically adaptive entrepreneurship, India is striving to become part of global electronics and semiconductor supply chains. Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Vision of “Make in India” and “Design in India” has been the guiding force behind the government’s incentive schemes that span skilling, design, fabrication, assembly, testing and packaging, and
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.