I recently reread the biography of Heinrich Theodor Boll (1917-1985). Boll was a German poet and novelist and the 1972 Nobel Prize in Literature winner. In my notebook, I have written down some of his words, which serve as a caution.
He said that all he saw when he looked at where the state existed was corrupt power, and that the spoiled remnants of a higher morality were maintained solely through noise and bluster.
At the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) 19th National Congress, Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平), who lived through the Cultural Revolution, assumed a status akin to that of an emperor and vowed to lead China to become a global superpower.
The CCP has never stopped its verbal intimidation and saber rattling toward Taiwan.
Born in the same year as Vladimir Lenin’s revolution, Boll lived in a Europe ravaged by Nazi Germany. Through his literary works, cultural discourses and social perspectives, he held up a mirror to the times in which he lived.
Nazi Germany once appeared invincible in the war in Europe, but everyone knows how things ended. Although Boll’s warning is based on his own nation’s situation, he could just as well have been writing about today’s China.
However, with some intellectuals fleeing into exile, how many Chinese can afford to tell the truth about their own nation?
China, a nation that has been through the humiliation of defeat at the hands of foreign powers in the later years of the Qing Empire, the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) rule and the establishment of Communist China, knows the dangers of being weak. Now that it is strong, it is failing to restrain itself and risks making the same mistakes as the powers that once oppressed it.
Taiwanese, having been subjected to long-term martial law under the KMT, know well the way in which the KMT and CCP wield power. Some might have had high expectations of Communist China, but now, with the exception of those who have hidden agendas, they should have woken up.
China wants to destroy the Republic of China (ROC) and annex Taiwan in the name of “reunification,” but has no idea why Taiwanese, who welcomed the “motherland” in 1946, would seek to establish a nation that is independent of China.
It is important to be a nation, but being a nation brings dangers. The former part of this statement applies to Taiwan; the latter applies to China. Nazi Germany’s expansion, aggression and Final Solution belong to the latter, as does the Japanese Empire.
To change the world’s impression of China, the CCP should practice good governance at home, with an emphasis on the universal values of a civilized nation.
Since Taiwan respects that the People’s Republic of China represents China, Beijing should renew its international image by letting Taiwan peacefully and democratically change the name ROC, which semantically and ideologically transgresses China, and move forward with a new name, forging a new history of two independent nations.
This would allow Xi to go down in history as being a good leader.
No nation should become the kind that Boll describes.
Taiwan and China should become normal nations and prioritize the well-being of their people, contributing to the development of world civilization.
Neither Taiwan nor China is a normal nation — the confrontation between oppression and resistance causes both sides to strain in vain and waste resources. Let a nation become a community of goodness — Taiwan and China should become friendly states.
Lee Min-yung is a poet.
Translated by Lin Lee-kai
Could Asia be on the verge of a new wave of nuclear proliferation? A look back at the early history of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), which recently celebrated its 75th anniversary, illuminates some reasons for concern in the Indo-Pacific today. US Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin recently described NATO as “the most powerful and successful alliance in history,” but the organization’s early years were not without challenges. At its inception, the signing of the North Atlantic Treaty marked a sea change in American strategic thinking. The United States had been intent on withdrawing from Europe in the years following
My wife and I spent the week in the interior of Taiwan where Shuyuan spent her childhood. In that town there is a street that functions as an open farmer’s market. Walk along that street, as Shuyuan did yesterday, and it is next to impossible to come home empty-handed. Some mangoes that looked vaguely like others we had seen around here ended up on our table. Shuyuan told how she had bought them from a little old farmer woman from the countryside who said the mangoes were from a very old tree she had on her property. The big surprise
The issue of China’s overcapacity has drawn greater global attention recently, with US Secretary of the Treasury Janet Yellen urging Beijing to address its excess production in key industries during her visit to China last week. Meanwhile in Brussels, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen last week said that Europe must have a tough talk with China on its perceived overcapacity and unfair trade practices. The remarks by Yellen and Von der Leyen come as China’s economy is undergoing a painful transition. Beijing is trying to steer the world’s second-largest economy out of a COVID-19 slump, the property crisis and
Ursula K. le Guin in The Ones Who Walked Away from Omelas proposed a thought experiment of a utopian city whose existence depended on one child held captive in a dungeon. When taken to extremes, Le Guin suggests, utilitarian logic violates some of our deepest moral intuitions. Even the greatest social goods — peace, harmony and prosperity — are not worth the sacrifice of an innocent person. Former president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁), since leaving office, has lived an odyssey that has brought him to lows like Le Guin’s dungeon. From late 2008 to 2015 he was imprisoned, much of this