In what direction is the great wheel of history turning? It surely must turn in the direction that the 7.6 billion people who live on Earth collectively wish it to go, reflecting the collective aspirations of almost 200 nations.
It cannot be decided by a single individual, nor by a single nation. It certainly cannot be decided by the 19th National Congress of the Chinese Communist Party (CCP). For every turn of the Earth on its axis, the world’s 7.6 billion people move through one more day.
Taiwan is a part of all this. With China’s rise, Beijing’s tone has, from one day to the next, become increasingly aggressive and demanding. People everywhere are telling Taiwanese that “time is not on Taiwan’s side.”
However, these people are like the proverbial toad at the bottom of the well, looking up at a circumscribed sky — they believe they have all the facts, unaware that they can see but a tiny part of the whole.
For more than a year now, the wheel of history has been turning, slowing but surely, in a direction that is beneficial to Taiwan.
Take, for example, the North Korean crisis. Pro-China academics and media have been saying that the US could sell Taiwan out if this would help it resolve the crisis with North Korea — by, for instance, signing a fourth communique with China. This flies in the face of common sense. It says more about what they would like to see happen than what is actually likely to happen.
The question is: Which is more important to the US: Taiwan or North Korea? Anyone with the slightest bit of common sense understands that, as far as the US is concerned, protecting Taiwan is far more important than resolving the North Korean crisis.
The worst-case scenario with North Korea is having just one more member, in addition to China, Russia, India and Pakistan, in the club of nations with nuclear weapons.
However, with the loss of Taiwan, the US can say goodbye to its influence in East Asia.
With the close of the CCP’s congress, China finally got its dictator: Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平).
In his report to the congress, Xi mentioned “Chinese characteristics” and the “Chinese dream” more than 40 times, making it clear that China would change the rules of the game in its own way.
He laid out the party’s plans for China to become a global superpower. There were some people in Taiwan who enthusiastically bought into Xi’s vision, but in the Western world it was met only with a deadly silence, as fear of a “Chinese nightmare” started creeping in.
Some people have suggested that Japanese Prime Minister Shinzo Abe’s electoral win on Oct. 22, in which he secured close to two-thirds of the seats in parliament, was due in large part to concerns over North Korea.
Actually, it was not North Korea: It was concern over what was happening in China, with Xi and the congress.
When Japanese saw the pomp and circumstance in China, why would they have voted in the opposition party? If Abe serves his full term and is in power until 2022, this can only be good for Taiwan.
Next, there is the shift to the right in Europe. In the Czech Republic’s general election, Czech prime minister-elect and ANO party leader Andrej Babis — who has earned himself the name “Czech Donald Trump” — won 78 seats in the nation’s legislature, making his party the largest.
Prior to this — although German Chancellor Angela Merkel was able to hold on to power, securing a fourth term in office — the right-wing Alternative for Germany party managed to win more than 90 seats, making it the third-largest party in Germany.
In Austria, the 31-year-old conservative Sebastian Kurz won big in the general election, with his People’s Party becoming the largest in Austria.
One thing these far-right parties have in common is a protectionist stance on trade when it comes to China.
Finally, India is also changing course. Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi has been working hard to deliver on his 2014 campaign promise of rejuvenating India, but the idea of the China threat has gradually been eking into mainstream thinking among the Indian elite.
More recently, India has been making a clear shift toward Japan, and in September it announced that Japan was going to build a bullet-train in India.
Relations with the US have also taken a better turn, and in the past few days people have heard of a new “Indo-Pacific” strategy, based on the US-Japan alliance and linking India with Australia as an antidote to China’s “One Belt, One Road” plans for regional domination.
The great wheel of history is not moving in the direction of the “Chinese dream.”
It is moving in the opposite direction, wary and repulsed by that idea.
When US President Donald Trump completes his Asia trip, people will see that the situation is increasingly moving in a direction favorable to Taiwan.
Huang Tien-lin is a national policy adviser.
Translated by Paul Cooper
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
The past few months have seen tremendous strides in India’s journey to develop a vibrant semiconductor and electronics ecosystem. The nation’s established prowess in information technology (IT) has earned it much-needed revenue and prestige across the globe. Now, through the convergence of engineering talent, supportive government policies, an expanding market and technologically adaptive entrepreneurship, India is striving to become part of global electronics and semiconductor supply chains. Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Vision of “Make in India” and “Design in India” has been the guiding force behind the government’s incentive schemes that span skilling, design, fabrication, assembly, testing and packaging, and
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.