Most Western media have characterized the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) 19th National Congress as a stage for a power play, with President Xi Jinping (習近平) entrenching his position.
However, the accumulation of political capital in this case is a means to an end.
For Xi, that end is a smooth transition into modernity that cements the CCP’s long-term authority and ensures his own legacy as modern China’s most significant leader.
Xi knows that if China is to continue to thrive in a fast-changing world, he needs to deftly manage a major social and economic transformation, while, even more importantly, improving state governance.
To secure the long-term survival of China’s one-party system, he must reform state and party institutions: Political reform, for Xi, is a prerequisite for economic reform.
Xi’s motive in pursuing modernity is not, as many in the West have wrongly inferred, to establish China as a superpower on par with the US. On the contrary, Xi views his current challenge and mission as being primarily domestic.
He is motivated by the knowledge that success in this area would define his place in history. That, not the amount of authority he wields today, is his primary concern. Assuming otherwise sells Xi — and his political ingenuity — short.
Now firmly established as China’s most powerful leader since Deng Xiaoping (鄧小平), Xi can shape his legacy according to his own vision.
Because his predecessor Hu Jintao (胡錦濤) lacked sufficient political capital to do likewise, China followed a largely passive path for a decade, pursuing conciliatory diplomacy, which enraged its citizens, and economically conservative strategies, which included suspending necessary reforms.
However, no one should mistake Xi’s enhanced powers for a personal dictatorship. His choice of members for the Politburo Standing Committee, China’s highest authority, was an accommodation to the reality that there are limits to his power. Only half of the men named to the committee are his true confidantes.
The legacy that Xi seeks comprises three key components. The first is alleviation of growing social tensions. Beyond improving the provision of public goods, his promotion of the so-called “China Dream” of national rejuvenation has been aimed, in part, at encouraging people to seek fulfillment beyond material wealth.
Second, Xi wants to strengthen the CCP not by force, but by reform. Over the past five years, Xi has led an unprecedented anti-corruption campaign, which has brought down 1 million party officials, from low-ranking bureaucrats (known as “flies”) to the highest-level officials (“tigers”), throughout the country.
Such a large-scale campaign, as some observers have portrayed it, was not a political purge in disguise. Rather, Xi knew that widespread corruption was undermining the CCP’s legitimacy in the eyes of ordinary Chinese. Only by cleaning up the party’s behavior could Xi re-establish its credibility.
Now, Xi is ready for Act II of his CCP revival: improving state governance.
Xi is well aware that a case-by-case approach would not address the root causes of widespread corruption. For that, the entire system needs an overhaul.
“The party needs to govern itself,” Xi has said.
The first step is to improve the legislative framework.
For many years, the lack of accountability, transparency and clear decisionmaking processes has impeded reform.
China needs institutionalized mechanisms for enforcing the rule of law — one aspect of Western political systems that Xi admires — among CCP officials, although the idea that the judiciary could be independent of the party remains far-fetched.
However, even the best-designed system cannot work if there is a dearth of competent personnel to run it — a limitation highlighted by Xi’s push for economic reforms in his first term as Chinese president.
That is why Xi is placing a strong emphasis on cultivating a new generation of highly educated, loyal and, most importantly, incorruptible party leaders.
A key challenge here lies in stemming the migration of China’s top talent to the private sector.
The third component of Xi’s legacy is also the most important — and already effectively secured.
At the congress, CCP delegates agreed to add “Xi Jinping Thought” to the party’s constitution, alongside “Mao Zedong (毛澤東) Thought” and “Deng Xiaoping Theory.” Now that Xi’s eponymous political ideology, which proposes an alternative to liberal democracy, is part of the school of thought around which the CCP coalesces, challenging Xi is tantamount to challenging the party’s very belief system.
Xi has made himself virtually unassailable — his rare political skill elevating him to the status of secular deity.
As a leader, Xi has a lot going for him. He is well-educated and experienced in international affairs. He has weathered serious challenges and experienced firsthand the consequences of political and economic policies gone awry.
He has a vast political network, thanks not only to his own deftness, but also to his family: He is the son of a comrade of Mao.
He now stands alongside Mao and Deng in modern China’s political pantheon.
However, Xi is not Mao, and he will not govern China as Mao did.
Instead, he will learn from Mao’s mistakes, so that he can lead China effectively into the next phase of its history — and secure the legacy that he so prizes.
Keyu Jin is a professor of economics at the London School of Economics, a World Economic Forum young global leader and a member of the Richemont Group Advisory Board.
Copyright: Project Syndicate
Could Asia be on the verge of a new wave of nuclear proliferation? A look back at the early history of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), which recently celebrated its 75th anniversary, illuminates some reasons for concern in the Indo-Pacific today. US Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin recently described NATO as “the most powerful and successful alliance in history,” but the organization’s early years were not without challenges. At its inception, the signing of the North Atlantic Treaty marked a sea change in American strategic thinking. The United States had been intent on withdrawing from Europe in the years following
My wife and I spent the week in the interior of Taiwan where Shuyuan spent her childhood. In that town there is a street that functions as an open farmer’s market. Walk along that street, as Shuyuan did yesterday, and it is next to impossible to come home empty-handed. Some mangoes that looked vaguely like others we had seen around here ended up on our table. Shuyuan told how she had bought them from a little old farmer woman from the countryside who said the mangoes were from a very old tree she had on her property. The big surprise
The issue of China’s overcapacity has drawn greater global attention recently, with US Secretary of the Treasury Janet Yellen urging Beijing to address its excess production in key industries during her visit to China last week. Meanwhile in Brussels, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen last week said that Europe must have a tough talk with China on its perceived overcapacity and unfair trade practices. The remarks by Yellen and Von der Leyen come as China’s economy is undergoing a painful transition. Beijing is trying to steer the world’s second-largest economy out of a COVID-19 slump, the property crisis and
Former president Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) trip to China provides a pertinent reminder of why Taiwanese protested so vociferously against attempts to force through the cross-strait service trade agreement in 2014 and why, since Ma’s presidential election win in 2012, they have not voted in another Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) candidate. While the nation narrowly avoided tragedy — the treaty would have put Taiwan on the path toward the demobilization of its democracy, which Courtney Donovan Smith wrote about in the Taipei Times in “With the Sunflower movement Taiwan dodged a bullet” — Ma’s political swansong in China, which included fawning dithyrambs