Most Western media have characterized the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) 19th National Congress as a stage for a power play, with President Xi Jinping (習近平) entrenching his position.
However, the accumulation of political capital in this case is a means to an end.
For Xi, that end is a smooth transition into modernity that cements the CCP’s long-term authority and ensures his own legacy as modern China’s most significant leader.
Xi knows that if China is to continue to thrive in a fast-changing world, he needs to deftly manage a major social and economic transformation, while, even more importantly, improving state governance.
To secure the long-term survival of China’s one-party system, he must reform state and party institutions: Political reform, for Xi, is a prerequisite for economic reform.
Xi’s motive in pursuing modernity is not, as many in the West have wrongly inferred, to establish China as a superpower on par with the US. On the contrary, Xi views his current challenge and mission as being primarily domestic.
He is motivated by the knowledge that success in this area would define his place in history. That, not the amount of authority he wields today, is his primary concern. Assuming otherwise sells Xi — and his political ingenuity — short.
Now firmly established as China’s most powerful leader since Deng Xiaoping (鄧小平), Xi can shape his legacy according to his own vision.
Because his predecessor Hu Jintao (胡錦濤) lacked sufficient political capital to do likewise, China followed a largely passive path for a decade, pursuing conciliatory diplomacy, which enraged its citizens, and economically conservative strategies, which included suspending necessary reforms.
However, no one should mistake Xi’s enhanced powers for a personal dictatorship. His choice of members for the Politburo Standing Committee, China’s highest authority, was an accommodation to the reality that there are limits to his power. Only half of the men named to the committee are his true confidantes.
The legacy that Xi seeks comprises three key components. The first is alleviation of growing social tensions. Beyond improving the provision of public goods, his promotion of the so-called “China Dream” of national rejuvenation has been aimed, in part, at encouraging people to seek fulfillment beyond material wealth.
Second, Xi wants to strengthen the CCP not by force, but by reform. Over the past five years, Xi has led an unprecedented anti-corruption campaign, which has brought down 1 million party officials, from low-ranking bureaucrats (known as “flies”) to the highest-level officials (“tigers”), throughout the country.
Such a large-scale campaign, as some observers have portrayed it, was not a political purge in disguise. Rather, Xi knew that widespread corruption was undermining the CCP’s legitimacy in the eyes of ordinary Chinese. Only by cleaning up the party’s behavior could Xi re-establish its credibility.
Now, Xi is ready for Act II of his CCP revival: improving state governance.
Xi is well aware that a case-by-case approach would not address the root causes of widespread corruption. For that, the entire system needs an overhaul.
“The party needs to govern itself,” Xi has said.
The first step is to improve the legislative framework.
For many years, the lack of accountability, transparency and clear decisionmaking processes has impeded reform.
China needs institutionalized mechanisms for enforcing the rule of law — one aspect of Western political systems that Xi admires — among CCP officials, although the idea that the judiciary could be independent of the party remains far-fetched.
However, even the best-designed system cannot work if there is a dearth of competent personnel to run it — a limitation highlighted by Xi’s push for economic reforms in his first term as Chinese president.
That is why Xi is placing a strong emphasis on cultivating a new generation of highly educated, loyal and, most importantly, incorruptible party leaders.
A key challenge here lies in stemming the migration of China’s top talent to the private sector.
The third component of Xi’s legacy is also the most important — and already effectively secured.
At the congress, CCP delegates agreed to add “Xi Jinping Thought” to the party’s constitution, alongside “Mao Zedong (毛澤東) Thought” and “Deng Xiaoping Theory.” Now that Xi’s eponymous political ideology, which proposes an alternative to liberal democracy, is part of the school of thought around which the CCP coalesces, challenging Xi is tantamount to challenging the party’s very belief system.
Xi has made himself virtually unassailable — his rare political skill elevating him to the status of secular deity.
As a leader, Xi has a lot going for him. He is well-educated and experienced in international affairs. He has weathered serious challenges and experienced firsthand the consequences of political and economic policies gone awry.
He has a vast political network, thanks not only to his own deftness, but also to his family: He is the son of a comrade of Mao.
He now stands alongside Mao and Deng in modern China’s political pantheon.
However, Xi is not Mao, and he will not govern China as Mao did.
Instead, he will learn from Mao’s mistakes, so that he can lead China effectively into the next phase of its history — and secure the legacy that he so prizes.
Keyu Jin is a professor of economics at the London School of Economics, a World Economic Forum young global leader and a member of the Richemont Group Advisory Board.
Copyright: Project Syndicate
Saudi Arabian largesse is flooding Egypt’s cultural scene, but the reception is mixed. Some welcome new “cooperation” between two regional powerhouses, while others fear a hostile takeover by Riyadh. In Cairo, historically the cultural capital of the Arab world, Egyptian Minister of Culture Nevine al-Kilany recently hosted Saudi Arabian General Entertainment Authority chairman Turki al-Sheikh. The deep-pocketed al-Sheikh has emerged as a Medici-like patron for Egypt’s cultural elite, courted by Cairo’s top talent to produce a slew of forthcoming films. A new three-way agreement between al-Sheikh, Kilany and United Media Services — a multi-media conglomerate linked to state intelligence that owns much of
The US and other countries should take concrete steps to confront the threats from Beijing to avoid war, US Representative Mario Diaz-Balart said in an interview with Voice of America on March 13. The US should use “every diplomatic economic tool at our disposal to treat China as what it is... to avoid war,” Diaz-Balart said. Giving an example of what the US could do, he said that it has to be more aggressive in its military sales to Taiwan. Actions by cross-party US lawmakers in the past few years such as meeting with Taiwanese officials in Washington and Taipei, and
The Republic of China (ROC) on Taiwan has no official diplomatic allies in the EU. With the exception of the Vatican, it has no official allies in Europe at all. This does not prevent the ROC — Taiwan — from having close relations with EU member states and other European countries. The exact nature of the relationship does bear revisiting, if only to clarify what is a very complicated and sensitive idea, the details of which leave considerable room for misunderstanding, misrepresentation and disagreement. Only this week, President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) received members of the European Parliament’s Delegation for Relations
Denmark’s “one China” policy more and more resembles Beijing’s “one China” principle. At least, this is how things appear. In recent interactions with the Danish state, such as applying for residency permits, a Taiwanese’s nationality would be listed as “China.” That designation occurs for a Taiwanese student coming to Denmark or a Danish citizen arriving in Denmark with, for example, their Taiwanese partner. Details of this were published on Sunday in an article in the Danish daily Berlingske written by Alexander Sjoberg and Tobias Reinwald. The pretext for this new practice is that Denmark does not recognize Taiwan as a state under