Most Western media have characterized the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) 19th National Congress as a stage for a power play, with President Xi Jinping (習近平) entrenching his position.
However, the accumulation of political capital in this case is a means to an end.
For Xi, that end is a smooth transition into modernity that cements the CCP’s long-term authority and ensures his own legacy as modern China’s most significant leader.
Xi knows that if China is to continue to thrive in a fast-changing world, he needs to deftly manage a major social and economic transformation, while, even more importantly, improving state governance.
To secure the long-term survival of China’s one-party system, he must reform state and party institutions: Political reform, for Xi, is a prerequisite for economic reform.
Xi’s motive in pursuing modernity is not, as many in the West have wrongly inferred, to establish China as a superpower on par with the US. On the contrary, Xi views his current challenge and mission as being primarily domestic.
He is motivated by the knowledge that success in this area would define his place in history. That, not the amount of authority he wields today, is his primary concern. Assuming otherwise sells Xi — and his political ingenuity — short.
Now firmly established as China’s most powerful leader since Deng Xiaoping (鄧小平), Xi can shape his legacy according to his own vision.
Because his predecessor Hu Jintao (胡錦濤) lacked sufficient political capital to do likewise, China followed a largely passive path for a decade, pursuing conciliatory diplomacy, which enraged its citizens, and economically conservative strategies, which included suspending necessary reforms.
However, no one should mistake Xi’s enhanced powers for a personal dictatorship. His choice of members for the Politburo Standing Committee, China’s highest authority, was an accommodation to the reality that there are limits to his power. Only half of the men named to the committee are his true confidantes.
The legacy that Xi seeks comprises three key components. The first is alleviation of growing social tensions. Beyond improving the provision of public goods, his promotion of the so-called “China Dream” of national rejuvenation has been aimed, in part, at encouraging people to seek fulfillment beyond material wealth.
Second, Xi wants to strengthen the CCP not by force, but by reform. Over the past five years, Xi has led an unprecedented anti-corruption campaign, which has brought down 1 million party officials, from low-ranking bureaucrats (known as “flies”) to the highest-level officials (“tigers”), throughout the country.
Such a large-scale campaign, as some observers have portrayed it, was not a political purge in disguise. Rather, Xi knew that widespread corruption was undermining the CCP’s legitimacy in the eyes of ordinary Chinese. Only by cleaning up the party’s behavior could Xi re-establish its credibility.
Now, Xi is ready for Act II of his CCP revival: improving state governance.
Xi is well aware that a case-by-case approach would not address the root causes of widespread corruption. For that, the entire system needs an overhaul.
“The party needs to govern itself,” Xi has said.
The first step is to improve the legislative framework.
For many years, the lack of accountability, transparency and clear decisionmaking processes has impeded reform.
China needs institutionalized mechanisms for enforcing the rule of law — one aspect of Western political systems that Xi admires — among CCP officials, although the idea that the judiciary could be independent of the party remains far-fetched.
However, even the best-designed system cannot work if there is a dearth of competent personnel to run it — a limitation highlighted by Xi’s push for economic reforms in his first term as Chinese president.
That is why Xi is placing a strong emphasis on cultivating a new generation of highly educated, loyal and, most importantly, incorruptible party leaders.
A key challenge here lies in stemming the migration of China’s top talent to the private sector.
The third component of Xi’s legacy is also the most important — and already effectively secured.
At the congress, CCP delegates agreed to add “Xi Jinping Thought” to the party’s constitution, alongside “Mao Zedong (毛澤東) Thought” and “Deng Xiaoping Theory.” Now that Xi’s eponymous political ideology, which proposes an alternative to liberal democracy, is part of the school of thought around which the CCP coalesces, challenging Xi is tantamount to challenging the party’s very belief system.
Xi has made himself virtually unassailable — his rare political skill elevating him to the status of secular deity.
As a leader, Xi has a lot going for him. He is well-educated and experienced in international affairs. He has weathered serious challenges and experienced firsthand the consequences of political and economic policies gone awry.
He has a vast political network, thanks not only to his own deftness, but also to his family: He is the son of a comrade of Mao.
He now stands alongside Mao and Deng in modern China’s political pantheon.
However, Xi is not Mao, and he will not govern China as Mao did.
Instead, he will learn from Mao’s mistakes, so that he can lead China effectively into the next phase of its history — and secure the legacy that he so prizes.
Keyu Jin is a professor of economics at the London School of Economics, a World Economic Forum young global leader and a member of the Richemont Group Advisory Board.
Copyright: Project Syndicate
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
The past few months have seen tremendous strides in India’s journey to develop a vibrant semiconductor and electronics ecosystem. The nation’s established prowess in information technology (IT) has earned it much-needed revenue and prestige across the globe. Now, through the convergence of engineering talent, supportive government policies, an expanding market and technologically adaptive entrepreneurship, India is striving to become part of global electronics and semiconductor supply chains. Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Vision of “Make in India” and “Design in India” has been the guiding force behind the government’s incentive schemes that span skilling, design, fabrication, assembly, testing and packaging, and
As former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) wrapped up his visit to the People’s Republic of China, he received his share of attention. Certainly, the trip must be seen within the full context of Ma’s life, that is, his eight-year presidency, the Sunflower movement and his failed Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement, as well as his eight years as Taipei mayor with its posturing, accusations of money laundering, and ups and downs. Through all that, basic questions stand out: “What drives Ma? What is his end game?” Having observed and commented on Ma for decades, it is all ironically reminiscent of former US president Harry