There has been much discussion regarding whether Taiwan should switch to a time zone other than China’s, but if proponents of the change are seeking to differentiate Taiwan from China, it would be better to simply rename the time zone.
The purpose of dividing the world into time zones is to enable people in different parts of the world to live their lives according to their circadian clock.
The first step in designating a time zone for a place is to decide how many time zones the place falls into by looking at the longitude, as every 15 degrees longitude make up one time zone. If a place does not exceed 15 degrees longitude on a map, then the entire place can belong to the same time zone. However, if it does, it may need more than one time zone.
Taiwan — including the Penghu archipelago and the other outlying islands – only extends over three degrees of longitude, so it can belong to a single time zone.
The next step in designating a time zone is to determine the time of the place based on its longitude.
Since Taiwan and its surrounding islands all fall between 119°E and 122°E, from a geoscientific standpoint, the most ideal time for Taiwan is GMT+8, the eighth time zone east of the prime meridian.
The final step in designating a time zone entails political factors. While geoscience might suggest that a particular time zone is ideal for a place, political factors might suggest another time zone.
Those who hope to change Taiwan’s time zone as a way of differentiating the nation from China should consider the following: First, simply changing the time zone does not make China less interested in annexing Taiwan; second, it will not make the Chinese government disappear. Moreover, changing the nation’s time zone to GMT+9 will increase its consumption of resources, increase safety risks and reduce the number of sleep hours — especially in winter.
Taiwan’s time zone used to be GMT+9 during the Japanese colonial period, but at that time, Taiwanese had no choice but to follow the wishes of their colonial masters, who of course did not care about whether that was convenient for their colony.
Today, the nation’s priority is of course to ensure the quality of life of Taiwanese, which makes it difficult to support people who believe that Taiwan’s time zone should be changed simply to further distinguish it from China.
Instead of changing time zones, Taiwan should rename its time zone from “Chinese standard time” to “Taiwanese standard time” or “Yushan standard time.”
If the nation really were to change its time zone to GMT+9, the government should change the time zone back to GMT+8 from October to March every year — designating it as "winter time" — to reduce the negative effect of the change.
The Ministry of the Interior’s Department of Civil Affairs is responsible for issues related to time zones and calendars, including the possibility of renaming or changing Taiwan’s time zone. Since there is no law regulating the naming of the nation’s time zone, the department could rename it by simply issuing an ordinance.
However, to encourage public participation and to promote a sense of community, it would be better still to let the public decide the name through online or in-person voting.
Huang Sheng-feng is the founder and principal investigator of PIL Research Projects, RoTP.
Translated by Tu Yu-an
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
The past few months have seen tremendous strides in India’s journey to develop a vibrant semiconductor and electronics ecosystem. The nation’s established prowess in information technology (IT) has earned it much-needed revenue and prestige across the globe. Now, through the convergence of engineering talent, supportive government policies, an expanding market and technologically adaptive entrepreneurship, India is striving to become part of global electronics and semiconductor supply chains. Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Vision of “Make in India” and “Design in India” has been the guiding force behind the government’s incentive schemes that span skilling, design, fabrication, assembly, testing and packaging, and
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
As former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) wrapped up his visit to the People’s Republic of China, he received his share of attention. Certainly, the trip must be seen within the full context of Ma’s life, that is, his eight-year presidency, the Sunflower movement and his failed Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement, as well as his eight years as Taipei mayor with its posturing, accusations of money laundering, and ups and downs. Through all that, basic questions stand out: “What drives Ma? What is his end game?” Having observed and commented on Ma for decades, it is all ironically reminiscent of former US president Harry