The legislature on Tuesday passed the Act Governing Recruitment and Employment of Foreign Professionals (外國專業人才延攬及雇用法), which seeks to loosen requirements on, and remove obstacles to, foreign professionals working and remaining in Taiwan.
Democratic Progressive Party Legislator Karen Yu (余宛如) hailed the act as addressing the nation’s twin low-birth-rate problems of a shrinking talent pool and a transition to a superannuated society.
The act does not cover all foreign workers. Its scope is limited to foreign professionals, which it specifies under three categories: Foreign professionals, including language teachers and foreigners engaged in skilled work in Taiwan; professionals with specific core technical, economic, educational, cultural, artistic and sports skills deemed essential to the nation; and senior professional personnel as needed by the state.
The National Development Council cites two major international studies — the World Talent Report 2016 by Switzerland’s International Institute for Management Development World Competitiveness Center and the Oxford Economics Global Talent 2021 report — as identifying Taiwan as having a “severe talent deficit” due to a net outflow of skilled professionals that is “growing more serious by the day,” due to the fiercely competitive international professional jobs market and a lack of incentives for professionals to work in Taiwan.
According to the council, the legislation is to relax provisions relating to foreign professionals’ visa, residence, insurance, tax and retirement conditions, to make the work environment friendlier.
In return, the nation benefits from being able to fill gaps in domestic talent and skills; the increased internationalization of Taiwanese companies’ positioning; the bolstering of its political and economic relations with other nations; and the promotion of industrial development and technical advancement.
Perhaps some of the more welcome and long-awaited changes are the extension of permanent residency rights and employment rights to spouses and children over 20, after certain conditions are met, or the increased options for receiving a pension.
These will make it easier for professionals with families, or those thinking they might want to settle in Taiwan, to accept employment here.
If you accept that foreign professionals can make a major contribution to the nation, and that Taiwan needs more immigration of professional foreign nationals to improve its prospects, then it only makes sense to remove pointless bureaucratic obstacles.
That addresses the issue, to a modest degree, of net talent outflow.
However, in what way does it address the problem of the transition to a superannuated population?
The repercussions of the low birth rate have received much attention lately. They include the increased burdens on pensions, healthcare and long-term care for the elderly, shortages of students, a real and proportional reduction in the working-age population and fewer recruits for the military.
How will immigration of non-nationals, and the extension of pension benefits, address this?
To be clear, this is not an argument against immigration, or for the denial of the extension. Any suggestion that replacement immigration is the key to the demographic problem should be seen as a distraction at best, and should come with a warning at worst.
Replacement immigration to mitigate the reduction of the working-age population is a possible policy, but it will only exacerbate the overburdening of the health insurance and pension systems. If done on a sufficient scale, it would mean a significant shift in the makeup of the population.
The act is a welcome development. Taiwan needs it. Just do not present it as a distraction to addressing the low birth rate.
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
The past few months have seen tremendous strides in India’s journey to develop a vibrant semiconductor and electronics ecosystem. The nation’s established prowess in information technology (IT) has earned it much-needed revenue and prestige across the globe. Now, through the convergence of engineering talent, supportive government policies, an expanding market and technologically adaptive entrepreneurship, India is striving to become part of global electronics and semiconductor supply chains. Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Vision of “Make in India” and “Design in India” has been the guiding force behind the government’s incentive schemes that span skilling, design, fabrication, assembly, testing and packaging, and
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.