These are challenging times for North Africa’s Muslim governments. Even as the Islamic State (IS) group is ousted from its strongholds in Iraq and Syria, it is continuing its battle against authorities in nations like Morocco, Algeria and Egypt.
On Oct. 16, the Egyptian military announced that six soldiers and at least 24 IS militants were killed in attacks on military outposts in North Sinai. That same weekend, Moroccan police arrested 11 members of an “extremely dangerous” IS-linked cell and seized chemical products used to make bombs. Meanwhile, Algerian forces have killed at least 71 militants so far this year — the most since 2014.
The list of arrests, shootouts and seizure of passports from citizens who want to be foreign fighters goes on, but North African leaders have to navigate a particularly tortuous sectarian path.
Illustration: Yusha
To avoid the perception that fighting extremism amounts to the persecution of the defenders of the faith, their governments have to be seen to be making visible gestures of Muslim piety — while also cracking down on Shiite proselytizing so as to rebut IS claims that authorities are complicit with Iran’s “plots and schemes” to carve up the region and spread Shiite Islam.
The Muslim Justice and Development Party in Morocco warned of a “sectarian Shiite invasion,” while the Grand Mufti of Mauritania called on his nation’s leaders to resist the “rising Shiite tide.”
One North African government minister I interviewed denounced “the intrusion of Shiism through social media, university dormitories, high schools and even quranic schools,” adding: “I ask myself whether the Persians want to dominate the Arab world.”
After Iraq, Yemen, Syria, Lebanon and Bahrein, is North Africa the next realm of a more assertive Iranian foreign policy? These fears come from Iran’s attempt to expand its influence in Algeria, Mauritania, Morocco, Tunisia — and its “backyard”: Senegal, Niger, Guinea and Mali.
Iranian Minister of Foreign Affairs Mohammad Javad Zarif toured the region in June, meeting with heads of government in Algeria, Mauritania and Tunisia in search of improved ties.
Iran might simply be looking for new economic partnerships to offset sanctions, but its outreach is enough to make some local powers nervous.
Around the same time, Iran launched satellites beaming Arabic-language Shiite religious programming into North African homes.
There are thought to be fewer than 20,000 Shiites in Algeria, and the government mandated the registration of all of them. The Algerian minister of religious affairs has said that Shiites have no right to spread their faith in Algeria, “because that causes sedition and other problems.”
“Algeria cannot play host to a sectarian war that does not concern it,” he said in an interview. “Neither Shiism, nor Wahhabism nor any of the other sects are the product of Algerians, nor do they come from Algeria. We refuse to be the battleground for two external and foreign ideologies.”
However, diplomatic relations resist easy categories. Algeria is one of only a handful of nations, along with Iran, to maintain good relations with Yemen’s Houthi rebels, who are Shiite. Algiers was Zarif’s first stop in North Africa in June.
Given the tiny number of Shiites living in North Africa and the tight control over mosques in the region, widespread Shiite religious influence on the ground is unrealistic.
Whether or not the scale of proselytism justifies the level of concern, Moroccan and Algerian leaders view Iran’s Africa policy as a threat to their domestic order and regional security.
The prospect of sectarian strife exists for “heterodox” — or non-Sunni — minorities scattered across the region, numbering in the millions who live under mainstream Sunni rule. Some of these groups are offshoots of Shiite Islam, but are not necessarily the source of conflict.
In Algeria, their mere difference — and the government’s toleration of them — sometimes provokes attack from local hardliners.
North Africa’s Sunni governments struggle with the reality that two adversaries — Iran and IS — are the net beneficiaries of the invasion of Iraq in 2003 and the crushing of Sunni opposition in Syria this year. The decline of Saudi influence after the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks and the downfall of Sunni Baathist rule in Iraq enhanced Iran’s stature while diminishing Sunni Arab influence in Afghanistan, Iraq and Syria — and opening a path for IS.
Officially, there is no Shiite minority in Morocco; unofficial estimates put the number at less than 2 percent. Nonetheless, the Moroccan Ministry of Foreign Affairs and International Cooperation has accused Iran of trying to alter “the kingdom’s religious fundamentals.”
The bad blood is the legacy of a sour relationship between Ayatollah Khomenei and King Hassan II (the father of Moroccan King Mohammed VI) in the 1980s. The ayatollah’s claims of supremacy over all Muslims threatened the Moroccan king’s role as “Emir al Mouamine” — leader of the faithful — of scores of millions of followers across northwest Africa.
Hassan chaired the international council of Muslim scholars that declared the ayatollah to be an apostate — “if he is Muslim, then I’m not” — and openly supported Iraq in its war with Iran.
In turn, Hassan thought he saw an Iranian hand behind his domestic travails. Tehran provided safe haven to the Moroccan armed opposition group Chabiba Islamiya, and Hassan publicly accused Iran of fomenting riots against rising living costs and the violent uprising in the northern Rif region that is home to many Berbers.
Street contestation in the Rif region this year has again put Rabat off balance and revived the accusations a generation later.
The contrast with neighboring Tunisia is significant. Tunis has enjoyed unbroken relations with Iran since 1990, including high-level exchanges before and after the January 2011 revolution that sparked what became known as the Arab Spring.
Trade with Iran increased significantly as a result, but hardly registered compared to much more significant trade with the EU, North Africa, China and Turkey.
Tunisia prides itself on being an island of sectarian tolerance in a rapidly polarizing region. Senior religious affairs officials proudly state that they represent all religions, including Christians and Jews, although in reality the nation has very few non-Sunni Muslims.
After the Jan. 15 revolution, Tunisia signed the UN Convention on Human Rights and helped protect religious freedom in Article 6 of its new constitution.
However, Saudi Arabia has maintained its natural advantage. A month after Zarif left Tunis, a Saudi government delegation arrived, including 53 businessmen. They signed agreements with the government worth US$200 million in development projects, including several hospitals and the renovations of a historic mosque in Kairouan.
However, not all nations in North Africa feel they have that freedom when they perceive a two-front ideological battle against IS and Iran. In response to the US Department of State’s admonishments on religious freedoms in Algeria, the Algerian minister of religious affairs said: “If they want to accuse us of defending Islam and our historic traditions, then let them.”
The defeat of IS in Raqqa, Syria, has bought time for North African governments to consolidate their religious communities, but that same defeat also removes an obstacle to Iranian influence — not unlike the fall of Baghdad nearly 15 years ago.
Do not expect the competition for leadership from the Persian Gulf to be resolved any time soon.
Jonathan Laurence is a non-resident senior fellow at the Brookings Institution, a political science professor at Boston College and the author of Coping with Defeat: Sunni Islam, Roman Catholicism and the Modern State. The opinions expressed here are his own.
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
Since the Russian invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, people have been asking if Taiwan is the next Ukraine. At a G7 meeting of national leaders in January, Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida warned that Taiwan “could be the next Ukraine” if Chinese aggression is not checked. NATO Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg has said that if Russia is not defeated, then “today, it’s Ukraine, tomorrow it can be Taiwan.” China does not like this rhetoric. Its diplomats ask people to stop saying “Ukraine today, Taiwan tomorrow.” However, the rhetoric and stated ambition of Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) on Taiwan shows strong parallels with