The Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) telegram to the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) on the opening of the latter’s 19th National Congress stated the year as Oct. 17, 106 (2017).
KMT spokesperson Hung Meng-kai (洪孟楷) said: “This is the spirit of ‘one China, different interpretations.’ This is how past KMT chairmen have handled their congratulatory telegrams and the CCP has responded using the Western chronology. It is a matter of mutual understanding. It is also an expression of the spirit of the [so-called] ‘1992 consensus’ and ‘one China, different interpretations,’ and that the two sides are looking for an opening for dialogue based on their positions.”
He also said: “Chronology is secondary, the most important thing is that the CCP and the KMT can engage in cross-strait dialogue and substantive exchanges. A willingness to engage in dialogue is helpful to peaceful cross-strait development. By comparison, after one year and five months in power, [President Tsai Ing-wen’s (蔡英文)] administration is unwilling to accept the ‘1992 consensus,’ which has resulted in a freezing of cross-strait relations and even a dangerous move toward opposition, and the Taiwanese public finds this to be both worrying and difficult to accept.”
To resolve the divergence between the KMT and the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP), make a show of goodwill toward China and connect with the international community, Taiwan has two choices when it comes to the official chronology.
The KMT could introduce a bill stipulating that government institutions change the “Republic of China” to “China.” In that case the KMT could have written “China, Oct. 17, 2017” in its telegram to the CCP.
This would probably upset Beijing, though, because it would probably want it to say “China, Oct. 17, 4602” given its long history.
The second option would be for the DPP and the New Power Party to initiate a bill to bring Taiwan in line with the international community by introducing the Western chronology.
Then the KMT and other people sympathizing with the CPP would be able to write “Oct. 17, 2017” which would perhaps be more acceptable for the CCP.
Finally, we could then use the KMT’s own statement given above to justify this change to Taiwanese: “Chronology is secondary, the most important thing is that the CCP and the KMT can engage in cross-strait dialogue and substantive exchanges.”
In November last year, a man struck a woman with a steel bar and killed her outside a hospital in China’s Fujian Province. Later, he justified his actions to the police by saying that he attacked her because she was small and alone, and he was venting his anger after a dispute with a colleague. To the casual observer, it could be seen as another case of an angry man gone mad for a moment, but on closer inspection, it reflects the sad side of a society long brutalized by violent political struggles triggered by crude Leninism and Maoism. Starting
If social media interaction is any yardstick, India remained one of the top countries for Taiwan last year. President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) has on several occasions expressed enthusiasm to strengthen cooperation with India, one of the 18 target nations in her administration’s New Southbound Policy. The past year was instrumental in fostering Taiwan-India ties and will be remembered for accelerated momentum in bilateral relations. However, most of it has been confined to civil society circles. Even though Taiwan launched its southbound policy in 2016, the potential of Taiwan-India engagement remains underutilized. It is crucial to identify what is obstructing greater momentum
In terms of the economic outlook for the semiconductor industry, Taiwan has outperformed the rest of the world for three consecutive years. This is quite rare. In addition, Taiwan has been playing an important role in the US-China technology dispute, and both want Taiwan on their side, reflecting the remaking of the nation’s semiconductor industry. Under the leadership of — above all — Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), the industry as a whole has shifted from a focus on capacity to a focus on quality, as companies now have to be able to provide integration of hardware and software, as well as
The US last week took action to remove most of the diplomatic red tape around US-Taiwan relations. While there have been adjustments in State Department “Guidelines on Relations with Taiwan” and other guidance before, no administration has ever so thoroughly dispensed with them. It is a step in the right direction. Of course, when there is a policy of formally recognizing one government (the People’s Republic of China or PRC) and not another (the Republic of China or ROC), officials from the top of government down need a systematic way of operationalizing the distinction. They cannot just make it up as