Farmers who fled war in the Colombian Andes are returning to revive their abandoned land, cultivating coffee trees that are boosting global supplies of the highest-quality beans.
Colombia’s five-decade civil war, the longest in the Americas, displaced millions and disrupted farming for decades in areas that produce coffee for the most exacting consumer.
The revival of coffee farming in the former conflict zones could help boost Colombia’s coffee output by 40 percent, according to government estimates.
That would raise global supplies of mild arabica beans by about 13 percent.
The additional supply could reduce the cost of the raw material for the world’s top roasters, many of whom are seeking to secure increased supply from Colombia.
About 950 coffee-growing families have returned to the San Carlos area, representing about 60 percent of the 1,600 families who left during the war, according to data from the Colombian Coffee Growers Federation.
The supply from this region, about 330km northwest of the Colombian capital of Bogota, could expand further as farmers plant more of their land and more people return to the region to provide the needed labor.
The area now has about 800 hectares of coffee farms, double the low of 400 hectares during the war.
That is still only about half of the 1,500 hectares prior to the conflict, according to federation data.
Among those who returned is Libardo Garcia, who lost two brothers in the conflict — one was shot and the other killed by a landmine. He and his family moved back to their 12-hectare farm in 2015 after fleeing in 2001.
“All the coffee trees were dead when we came back,” said Garcia, who has since planted 8,000 trees on 2 hectares of steeply sloped land.
Arabica is the highest-quality coffee bean and Colombia is the world’s top producer of mild arabica. To make that variety, beans are separated from the cherry and dried to increase quality.
Arabica makes up about 60 percent of global coffee supplies, with lower-quality robusta beans accounting for the rest. While some coffee roasters add robusta to their highly secretive blends, premium brands are typically 100 percent mild arabica.
A peace deal between the government and the rebel Revolutionary Armed Forces of Colombia (FARC) late last year paved the way for many to return to their homes and farms, including thousands of coffee growers.
About 220,000 people died and millions were displaced in decades of fighting among leftist guerillas, paramilitary groups, criminal organizations and government forces.
The conflict impacted large areas of the country, and the government struggled to exert control over highlands and remote jungle areas in the west and south of the country.
Some farmers who stayed through the violence have also switched to coffee from growing coca and other illegal crops that they cultivated during the conflict. Coca is used for cocaine production and the cash from growing it helped finance armed groups during the war.
The combination of farmers returning to their abandoned land and others switching to coffee could help boost the country’s total output to a record 20 million 60kg bags by 2020, the government estimates, up from 14.2 million bags last year.
In the Andean region of San Carlos, the revival in coffee production has advanced quickly since conflict in the region abated around 2014, when the peace deal was still being negotiated. The country’s conflict with rebels began in 1964 and peaked in the region around 2000.
After fleeing his farm, Garcia spent time in the city of Medellin and then in the town of San Carlos.
“We came back because we love the land,” he said, leaning against the fence outside his home, a brick house adorned with baskets of flowers.
Wearing a wide-brimmed hat, Garcia pointed out a former FARC stronghold in the distance, in tree-covered mountains about an hour’s walk from his farm.
Most of his neighbors have yet to return, he said, either because they are skeptical the peace will last or because they have made lives elsewhere.
Before moving his family back, Garcia traveled the 13km from nearby San Carlos every weekend for three years to plant new coffee trees and remove the dead ones.
Garcia has plenty of land to expand his farm further, but cannot yet find the labor because too few people have returned to surrounding communities.
New high-yielding trees have helped boost harvests, but the region is still far from reaching its potential because of the labor shortage, said Rosa Velasques, manager of the local cooperative where about 1,000 local farmers sell their beans.
International roasters have jumped at the opportunity to buy more beans from Colombia, the world’s third-largest coffee producer and the source of a third of the world’s mild arabica supplies.
Italian roaster illycaffe has expanded its buying to parts of the country that were unreachable during the violence.
“Now they’ve opened up,” illycaffe chairman Andrea Illy said.
The firm had increased purchases from the region by double digit percentages for the past two to three years, Illy said, and it expects growth to continue at similar rates.
Last year, Nestle Nespresso bought its first coffee from a post-conflict region of Colombia and launched it this year as a limited edition.
“A lot of these regions, nobody had even been in and tasted the coffee until recently,” Nestle Nespresso corporate communications manager Katherine Graham said.
“There are some areas with strong potential,” Graham said. “But it needs a lot of development, a lot of work.”
Starbucks Co expanded its partnership with the US Agency for International Development to give 1,000 farmers in post-conflict zones agricultural training.
It also partnered with the Inter-American Development Bank to support 2,000 farmers in Colombia — mainly women — with a loan initiative.
Colombian entrepreneur Gonzalo Navarro earlier this year launched a roasting company called Piccolo Piacere in Medellin, focusing on sourcing from small coffee growers, many in former conflict zones.
“We have access to farmers who in the past were growing other things, such as coca,” he said.
Back near San Carlos, farmer Rubiela Cuervo works a remote farm with her family. She fled to Medellin to escape the violence in 2005, but struggled to make a living and returned a year later, despite the ongoing violence.
She has expanded the farm as peace returned to the area in recent years.
“We hope that peace will bring us more employment, more income for our work,” she said. “I’m hoping not to be displaced again.”
China has long sought shortcuts to developing semiconductor technologies and local supply chains by poaching engineers and experts from Taiwan and other nations. It is also suspected of stealing trade secrets from Taiwanese and US firms to fulfill its ambition of becoming a major player in the global semiconductor industry in the next decade. However, it takes more than just money and talent to build a semiconductor supply chain like the one which Taiwan and the US started to cultivate more than 30 years ago. Amid rising trade and technology tensions between the world’s two biggest economies, Beijing has become
With a new White House document in May — the “Strategic Approach to the People’s Republic of China” — the administration of US President Donald Trump has firmly set its hyper-competitive line to tackle geoeconomic and geostrategic rivalry, followed by several reinforcing speeches by Trump and other Cabinet-level officials. By identifying China as a near-equal rival, the strategy resonates well with the bipartisan consensus on China in today’s severely divided US. In the face of China’s rapidly growing aggression, the move is long overdue, yet relevant for the maintenance of the international “status quo.” The strategy seems to herald a new
To say that this year has been eventful for China and the rest of the world would be something of an understatement. First, the US-China trade dispute, already simmering for two years, reached a boiling point as Washington tightened the noose around China’s economy. Second, China unleashed the COVID-19 pandemic on the world, wreaking havoc on an unimaginable scale and turning the People’s Republic of China into a common target of international scorn. Faced with a mounting crisis at home, Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) rashly decided to ratchet up military tensions with neighboring countries in a misguided attempt to divert the
Toward the end of former president Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) final term in office, there was much talk about his legacy. Ma himself would likely prefer history books to enshrine his achievements in reducing cross-strait tensions. He might see his meeting with Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) in Singapore in 2015 as the high point. However, given his statements in the past few months, he might be remembered more for contributing to the breakup of the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT). We are still talking about Ma and his legacy because it is inextricably tied to the so-called “1992 consensus” as the bedrock of his