Adnan Hassan, a Syrian Kurd, finally has hope for himself and his people.
Two years ago, Islamic State group militants nearly wiped out his hometown, Kobani, along Syria’s border with Turkey and killed 10 members of his family. Now with the militants driven out and going down in defeat, a new university is opening in the town, and Hassan will be its professor for Kurdish language and literature.
It is the first university in the self-administered Kurdish areas and the first in Syria to teach Kurdish.
Illustration: Mountain People
The future of his people, Syria’s largest ethnic minority long ostracized by the government, could not look better, he said.
“We are living a dream and we are waiting for this dream to come true,” Hassan said.
Across the border, Iraq’s Kurds have sparked a major confrontation with their neighbors and Baghdad by holding a referendum for outright independence, while Syria’s Kurds are making major advances toward their own, less ambitious goal — winning recognition for the self-rule they seized during Syria’s war.
They say their aspirations for a federal system in Syria might now find more international and domestic support, and they are positioned as a player Damascus must reckon with in any final resolution of the conflict.
Perhaps more importantly, they have land.
Backed by the US in the fight against the Islamic State group, Kurdish forces control nearly 25 percent of Syria. They hold most of the northern border with Turkey and have expanded into non-Kurdish, Arab-dominated areas.
The US has set up bases there to provide battlefield support for the Kurdish-led Syrian Democratic Forces, as well as the training and advising of security forces, and the new civilian administrations in liberated areas.
The Kurds have also maintained close ties with Russia and are confident they can fend off Turkey, which is vehemently opposed to a Kurdish entity on its border.
The ruling Kurdish Democratic Union Party (PYD) heads a de facto self-rule administration in the Kurdish-majority region of northern Syria known as Rojava.
As part of their efforts to promote a federal system, they elected new local councils late last month. By early next year, they hope to elect their first regional parliament, representative of Kurds, Arabs, Assyrians and Turkmen.
“In Rojava, we have a federal project. In [Iraqi] Kurdistan, it is the long awaited state. The two complement one another in realizing the Kurds’ aspiration for a dignified life,” Hassan said.
It is a remarkable turnaround.
Syria’s Kurds were about 10 percent of the pre-war population of 23 million, but Damascus had long suppressed any expression of their identity in the majority Arab nation.
Jubilant Syrian Kurds celebrated their neighbors’ independence referendum by flying Iraqi Kurdish flags alongside the flags of their own militia from cars honking down the streets late into the night, but the surge in Kurdish power in both Iraq and Syria does not mean the two sides are about to join — they remain divided by political rivalries.
Iraqi Kurdistan’s referendum sparked furious opposition from the Iraqi government, as well as Iran and Turkey, who fear it will fuel secessionist movements among their own Kurdish minorities and dismantle the map of the Fertile Crescent in place since World War I.
There was also a backlash from the Arabs. Lebanon’s Hezbollah accused the US, Saudi Arabia and Israel — the only state to support Kurdish independence — of manipulating Kurds to start another war.
Syrian Kurdish leaders say their vision is for a federal system across Syria that would maintain unity, while giving considerable autonomy to various regions. They depict their proposal as a way out of the nation’s intractable seven-year-old civil war.
In a first, Syrian President Bashar al-Assad’s government said it might be ready to talk to the Kurds.
Syrian Minister of Foreign Affairs Ibrahim al-Muallem said that Syria’s Kurds want “some form of self-administration” within Syria, unlike Iraqi Kurds’ push for independence.
“This is something negotiable and can be discussed. When we are done with fighting DAESH, we can sit with our Kurdish sons and find a formula for the future,” he said, using the Arabic acronym for the Islamic State group.
llham Ahmed, a senior Kurdish official in the political wing of the Syrian Democratic Forces, said the government statement can be a starting point toward negotiations, underlining that the federal proposal is not for the Kurds alone.
The Kurds “have become the dark horse that can’t be overlooked or excluded like in the past. We will be participating practically in the political process and we will be influential,” Ahmed said.
The Syrian government is far from ready to share power, bolstered by battlefield victories, and unwavering Russian and Iranian backing. Still, its position is not secure, with local ceasefires on various fronts liable to crumble, and a growing presence of regional and international forces on its territory.
The Kurds represent an indisputable interlocutor amid a fragmented opposition, otherwise dominated by Islamist groups, but Syria’s Kurds could face a looming confrontation with Turkey.
Ankara views the PYD as an extension of Turkey’s own Kurdish insurgency led by the Kurdistan Workers’ Party (PKK) and is determined to avert Kurdish power next door.
Last year, its troops captured a pocket of territory inside Syria to prevent a contiguous Kurdish hold along the frontier.
Turkish forces, with Syrian allies, have skirmished with Kurdish forces holding the northwestern town of Afrin and Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan on Saturday last week announced that it was launching an operation in nearby Idlib Province, controlled by al-Qaeda-linked fighters.
Meanwhile, a race is on between the US and the Kurds on one side and the Syria-Russia-Iran alliance on the other for the oil-rich, eastern province of Deir el-Zour.
Each side is fighting to take back as much territory as it can from the Islamic State group.
That race could determine the borders of a Kurdish-administrated area.
The drive is also a competition between the US and Iran to grab influence in Syria.
“The United States can limit Iran’s freedom of action in the region by becoming a major patron for the Kurds,” while trying to be “polite with Turkey,” Joshua Landis, a Syria expert and professor at the University of Oklahoma, told non-governmental organization Syria Direct.
The PYD is ideologically affiliated with the PKK, inspired by its leader Abdullah Ocalan.
For almost 20 years, Ocalan found refuge in Syria until Damascus expelled him in 1998. He has been imprisoned in Turkey since, but is omnipresent in northern Syria.
Affectionately referred to as “Apo,” or uncle, Ocalan’s vision mixing Marxism, social egalitarianism and a revolution of women who share leadership roles with men remains common parlance among Kurdish fighters and officials. Graffiti about women’s liberation and the imprisoned Ocalan are pervasive.
Washington found in the secular-leaning, disciplined fighters its main leverage in Syria.
It advised them to rebrand to distance themselves from the PKK.
US Army General Raymond Thomas, head of Special Operations Command, described it as a “stroke of brilliance” to include democracy in their new name: the Syrian Democratic Forces.
Mazloum Kobani, the Kurdish commander who leads the forces and who coined the name, warned that without Washington’s political support for the federation idea, gains in the fight against the Islamic State group might be lost.
He said the government and its allied Shiite militias remain a “threat.”
“We don’t want to fight with anyone, but we will defend ourselves,” Kobani told the Al-Monitor news site last month in his first comments to the press.
The challenges are also internal as Kurdish communities remain split.
The ruling party of Iraq’s Kurdish zone has long cultivated ties with Ankara, the main enemy of the PYD. Land-locked Iraqi Kurdistan depends on Turkey for access to the outside world for its oil. When the PYD first set up its self-rule administration early in Syria’s war, Iraqi Kurds closed their border with Rojava.
Some believed the rivalry would ease with Turkey’s opposition to the Iraqi Kurdish referendum, but Iraqi Kurds are unlikely to further aggravate Ankara by softening their stance toward their Syrian counterparts.
Days after the referendum, Syrian Kurdish officials from Europe trying to attend a PYD conference in Syria were denied entry at the Iraq crossing.
The PYD’s internal rival, the once powerful Kurdish National Council, has allied with the Iraqi Kurds’ ruling party and refused to participate in the self-administration project. Many of its members now live in Iraq’s Irbil.
Khaled Ali, an opposition member in Irbil, said his family had to take one of their youngest members out of Rojava before high school fearing he would be recruited by the militia.
“There is excessive militarization of society,” Ali said.
Still, confidence in the future is palpable in Rojava.
Resources have poured in to rebuild destroyed towns such as Kobani. Oil revenues from fields seized from the Islamic State group and the government have boosted the administration’s coffers.
Hassan said the new Rojava University is to open next month with 400 students. Kurdish language teaching will be as high a priority as training engineers and doctors.
While he is concerned some of his colleagues who rose to power might “become corrupt,” he believes the administration will correct course, guided by Apo’s views and “the sacrifices of martyrs,” and maybe work with other Kurdish parties.
“This administration would be weakened if it remained alone,” Hassan said.
With its passing of Hong Kong’s new National Security Law, the People’s Republic of China (PRC) continues to tighten its noose on Hong Kong. Gone is the broken 1997 promise that Hong Kong would have free, democratic elections by 2017. Gone also is any semblance that the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) plays the long game. All the CCP had to do was hold the fort until 2047, when the “one country, two systems” framework would end and Hong Kong would rejoin the “motherland.” It would be a “demonstration-free” event. Instead, with the seemingly benevolent velvet glove off, the CCP has revealed its true iron
At the end of last month, Paraguayan Ambassador to Taiwan Marcial Bobadilla Guillen told a group of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) legislators that his president had decided to maintain diplomatic ties with Taiwan, despite pressure from the Chinese government and local businesses who would like to see a switch to Beijing. This followed the Paraguayan Senate earlier this year voting against a proposal to establish ties with China in exchange for medical supplies. This constituted a double rebuke of the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) diplomatic agenda in a six-month span from Taiwan’s only diplomatic ally in South America. Last year, Tuvalu rejected an
South China Sea exercises in July by two United States Navy nuclear-powered aircraft carriers reminds that Taiwan’s history since mid-1950, and as a free nation, is intertwined with that of the aircraft carrier. Eventually Taiwan will host aircraft carriers, either those built under its democratic government or those imposed on its territory by the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) and its People’s Liberation Army Navy (PLAN). By September 1944, a lack of sufficient carrier airpower and land-based airpower persuaded US Army and Navy leaders to forgo an invasion to wrest Taiwan from Japanese control, thereby sparing Taiwanese considerable wartime destruction. But two
As Taiwan is engulfed in worries about Chinese infiltration, news reports have revealed that power inverters made by China’s Huawei Technologies Co are used in the solar panels on the top of the Legislative Yuan’s Zhenjiang House (鎮江會館) on Zhenjiang Street in Taipei. However, what is even more worrying is that Taiwan’s new national electronic identification card (eID) has been subcontracted to the French security firm and eID maker Idemia, which has not only cooperated with the Chinese Public Security Bureau to manufacture eIDs in China, but also makes the new identification cards being issued in Hong Kong. There might be more