Long before most people ever heard of climate change, scientists divided a patch of Harvard University-owned forest in central Massachusetts into 18 identical 6m by 6m squares. A canopy of red maple and black oak trees hangs there, looming above the same stony soil tilled by colonial farmers. Rich in organic material, it was exactly what the researchers were looking for.
They broke the land up into six blocks of three squares each. In every block, one square was left alone, one was threaded with heating cables that elevated its temperature 5°C above the surrounding area. The third square was threaded with cables, but never turned on, as a control.
That was 26 years ago.
Illustration: Yusha
The purpose was to measure how carbon-dioxide might escape from the Earth as the atmosphere warms. What they found, published this month in the journal Science, might mean the accelerating catastrophe of global warming has been fueled in part by warm dirt.
As the Earth heats up, microbes in the soil accelerate the breakdown of organic materials and move on to others that might have once been ignored, each time releasing carbon dioxide into the atmosphere.
Extrapolating from their forest study, the researchers estimate that over this century the warming induced from global soil loss, at the rate they monitored, would be “equivalent to the past two decades of carbon emissions from fossil fuel burning and is comparable in magnitude to the cumulative carbon losses to the atmosphere due to human-driven land use change during the past two centuries.”
Taking care of the planet’s soil is “critical for stabilizing atmospheric CO2 [carbon dioxide] concentrations,” the report said.
However, the good news is that the research community is now fully on the case. Over the past week, at least four high-profile papers largely funded by the US government have contributed new evidence, observations and insight into the role of soil and forests in the global carbon cycle — the flow of material in and out of land, air, life and sea that is currently broken and getting worse.
From a technical perspective what they are talking about here is plain old dirt. Ground. Loam. Land. Trees and leaves.
From a practical perspective, it is something different entirely. Soil is also cotton, corn, soybean, wheat, oranges, cattle, and the rest of humanity’s food and fiber.
When it is healthy, it grows almost everything we need. It absorbs and retains moisture that might otherwise flood valleys where people live. It also absorbs and retains carbon that might otherwise be heating up the atmosphere.
The atmosphere gets all the attention in climate change, mostly because that is where the warming happens. Even the oceans draw more concern than soil, especially when their warming temperature helps fuel massive storms and floods that kill humans and destroy communities, but the seas should not be ignored: They hold 60 times more carbon than the atmosphere and absorb more than 90 percent of the heat industrial pollution generates.
The soil, though, has been largely ignored until lately.
It is something that is both hugely influential on global warming and something humanity has a good deal of control over.
The top 3m or so of earth stores more carbon than the entire atmosphere and plants combined. Taking care of the planet’s soil is “critical for stabilizing atmospheric CO2 concentrations,” according to a synthesis by Stanford University’s Robert Jackson and five colleagues, published in the Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution and Systematics.
Scientists are not going to resolve the global carbon cycle down to the last atom anytime soon. What the Annual Review authors do point out, though, is that land-use and agricultural practices can simultaneously trap carbon in soil — helping the fight against warming — and improving yields for all the things humanity’s swelling population is going to need in the coming decades.
Reducing tillage and fallow time, better managing grazing, planting more legumes and other practices all help keep more carbon in the ground.
Back when the soil researchers were setting up their Harvard forest plots in 1991, Earth-system science and soil-health science were completely different fields. That has been changing in ways that should be encouraged, according to another report, in Global Change Biology.
Binding scientists, policymakers and landowners together in conversation could have a significant effect on reducing global carbon dioxide, perhaps offsetting projected emissions from thawing permafrost in the rapidly melting, high-latitude Northern Hemisphere.
The authors tout as a hopeful example the International Soil Carbon Network, a scientific initiative designed to pool data and identify gaps in monitoring and knowledge.
“Soils have entered an ‘anthropogenic state,’ with most of the global surface area either directly managed by humans or indirectly influenced by human activities,” they wrote.
Warming soil might set off a chain reaction of carbon emissions that “could be very difficult, if not impossible, to halt,” they added.
The hopeful best-practices and calls for collaboration among scientists and land-managers laid out in the Annual Review and Global Change Biology are tempered by the steady drumbeat of off-putting news from other parts of the science research community.
Late last month, scientists from Woods Hole Research Center and Boston University published in Science analysis of satellite data showing one of the most dramatic turnabouts in recent memory.
Long thought of as sponges that suck in carbon dioxide from the atmosphere, tropical forests might actually be a source of emissions.
Deforestation is obviously an enemy of forests, but what the authors found was that forest degradation — losing healthy patches here or there to human or natural causes — is more damaging to carbon-soaking capacity than was previously believed.
The Harvard forest study published in Science leaves readers on a similarly thought-provoking note. The research itself found that soil loses its carbon in pulses of microbial activity.
Microbes feast away on organic matter in elevated temperatures, chewing it down to carbon dioxide and emitting it. Then the soil settles down to emission rates seen in non-heated areas, the microbes having exhausted their food source.
After a time, new microbes move into the heated patches and eat harder-to-digest material, such as lignin, the organic ploymer that makes wood hard.
Then they, too, get sated and die off or move on, reducing emission rates with them.
Scientists have long been concerned that once humans kicked off warming of the atmosphere and seas, other parts of nature would take what we have begun and run with it.
Some things are in our control — land use, pollution from fossil-fuel combustion — but a global pulse in microbial carbon-munching, they write, “could be very difficult, if not impossible, to halt.”
Saudi Arabian largesse is flooding Egypt’s cultural scene, but the reception is mixed. Some welcome new “cooperation” between two regional powerhouses, while others fear a hostile takeover by Riyadh. In Cairo, historically the cultural capital of the Arab world, Egyptian Minister of Culture Nevine al-Kilany recently hosted Saudi Arabian General Entertainment Authority chairman Turki al-Sheikh. The deep-pocketed al-Sheikh has emerged as a Medici-like patron for Egypt’s cultural elite, courted by Cairo’s top talent to produce a slew of forthcoming films. A new three-way agreement between al-Sheikh, Kilany and United Media Services — a multi-media conglomerate linked to state intelligence that owns much of
The US and other countries should take concrete steps to confront the threats from Beijing to avoid war, US Representative Mario Diaz-Balart said in an interview with Voice of America on March 13. The US should use “every diplomatic economic tool at our disposal to treat China as what it is... to avoid war,” Diaz-Balart said. Giving an example of what the US could do, he said that it has to be more aggressive in its military sales to Taiwan. Actions by cross-party US lawmakers in the past few years such as meeting with Taiwanese officials in Washington and Taipei, and
The Republic of China (ROC) on Taiwan has no official diplomatic allies in the EU. With the exception of the Vatican, it has no official allies in Europe at all. This does not prevent the ROC — Taiwan — from having close relations with EU member states and other European countries. The exact nature of the relationship does bear revisiting, if only to clarify what is a very complicated and sensitive idea, the details of which leave considerable room for misunderstanding, misrepresentation and disagreement. Only this week, President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) received members of the European Parliament’s Delegation for Relations
Denmark’s “one China” policy more and more resembles Beijing’s “one China” principle. At least, this is how things appear. In recent interactions with the Danish state, such as applying for residency permits, a Taiwanese’s nationality would be listed as “China.” That designation occurs for a Taiwanese student coming to Denmark or a Danish citizen arriving in Denmark with, for example, their Taiwanese partner. Details of this were published on Sunday in an article in the Danish daily Berlingske written by Alexander Sjoberg and Tobias Reinwald. The pretext for this new practice is that Denmark does not recognize Taiwan as a state under