In only nine months, the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) has completed its chairmanship, Central Committee and Central Standing Committee elections, and is about to elect directors of its local chapters.
Looking at this slew of elections, it seems like the KMT has been thoroughly democratized, when in fact these elections were purposeless. They did not make people think that the party was acting on behalf of the public and initiating reform. Instead, it is like a straw man with a body and no soul, unable to stabilize the turbulent political situation.
Opinion polls show that support for the KMT has not only failed to increase, but has fallen. No one views the party as a threat in the 2020 presidential election.
As for the local elections next year, it is difficult to imagine the party achieving any exceptional results except in New Taipei City, where it has a stable support base.
As the once-glorious party drifts aimlessly, disappointed supporters are becoming increasingly indifferent to its performance.
The root of the problem is the power struggle among KMT heavyweights over the past year. They are unable to propose any concrete views or new ideas to promote public welfare, and worse, the party is losing its core ideals and beliefs, but the heavyweights neither care nor try to protect them.
Take for example the election of Central Standing Committee members. It was hard to glean from media reports why the candidates wanted to run in the first place, or why it was significant. The only news that came through was about how candidates kept exchanging support for each other, buying each other big meals, or rumors about vote-buying practices. Many party members did not even know who was running in the election until they saw the results.
What is worse is that among the 32 seats up for grabs, 20 went to incumbents and 12 to new members. This means that new members account for less than 40 percent of the total, many of whom are the same old faces.
Unfortunately, a few candidates, such as KMT Legislator Lai Shyh-bao (賴士葆) — an economist who is not afraid of defending the party’s policies — were not elected, because they were unwilling to join the groups exchanging support with each other. As bad money drives out good money, the election outcome can only make one sigh.
People support a party because of the policies and ideals it holds. A party should be able to adjust its policies and ideals, but it must make sure that the adjustments are based on public support and speaks up for the people. It is a pity that the KMT has been perfunctory or even absent in policymaking over the past year.
Despite public discontent with the Cabinet’s Forward-looking Infrastructure Development Program and the party’s strong start in its criticism, it all came to nothing in the end. When it came to pension reform, the KMT tried to avoid the issue.
As for Premier William Lai’s (賴清德) pro-Taiwan independence statement, it pretended that nothing happened. No wonder China is not pleased with its performance, while Taiwanese are starting to question the value of its continued existence.
The party’s most urgent task is to provide a review of its defeat in last year’s presidential election, which it has been unable to do after nearly two years.
The party needs a change of pace and must make sure that the local chapter director elections do not continue to hurt the party. Otherwise, it might be further marginalized and become even more invisible in next year’s local government elections.
Chiu Chou-yuan is an independent political commentator and a former member of the National Assembly for the New Party.
Translated by Eddy Chang
Saudi Arabian largesse is flooding Egypt’s cultural scene, but the reception is mixed. Some welcome new “cooperation” between two regional powerhouses, while others fear a hostile takeover by Riyadh. In Cairo, historically the cultural capital of the Arab world, Egyptian Minister of Culture Nevine al-Kilany recently hosted Saudi Arabian General Entertainment Authority chairman Turki al-Sheikh. The deep-pocketed al-Sheikh has emerged as a Medici-like patron for Egypt’s cultural elite, courted by Cairo’s top talent to produce a slew of forthcoming films. A new three-way agreement between al-Sheikh, Kilany and United Media Services — a multi-media conglomerate linked to state intelligence that owns much of
The US and other countries should take concrete steps to confront the threats from Beijing to avoid war, US Representative Mario Diaz-Balart said in an interview with Voice of America on March 13. The US should use “every diplomatic economic tool at our disposal to treat China as what it is... to avoid war,” Diaz-Balart said. Giving an example of what the US could do, he said that it has to be more aggressive in its military sales to Taiwan. Actions by cross-party US lawmakers in the past few years such as meeting with Taiwanese officials in Washington and Taipei, and
The Republic of China (ROC) on Taiwan has no official diplomatic allies in the EU. With the exception of the Vatican, it has no official allies in Europe at all. This does not prevent the ROC — Taiwan — from having close relations with EU member states and other European countries. The exact nature of the relationship does bear revisiting, if only to clarify what is a very complicated and sensitive idea, the details of which leave considerable room for misunderstanding, misrepresentation and disagreement. Only this week, President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) received members of the European Parliament’s Delegation for Relations
Denmark’s “one China” policy more and more resembles Beijing’s “one China” principle. At least, this is how things appear. In recent interactions with the Danish state, such as applying for residency permits, a Taiwanese’s nationality would be listed as “China.” That designation occurs for a Taiwanese student coming to Denmark or a Danish citizen arriving in Denmark with, for example, their Taiwanese partner. Details of this were published on Sunday in an article in the Danish daily Berlingske written by Alexander Sjoberg and Tobias Reinwald. The pretext for this new practice is that Denmark does not recognize Taiwan as a state under