On Tuesday, a leaked White House document offered instructions for staff and surrogates on addressing the slaughter in Las Vegas.
Above all, the message was delay.
“Let’s wait for the facts before we make sweeping policy arguments for curtailing the second amendment,” the marching orders led off.
They ended with a number of reasons that could be given for why the US should not act, or even debate the issue now.
If they sounded oddly familiar, it is because US Republican politicians use the same lines all the time.
This week, US Senator Mitch McConnell and sundry Republican legislators have reeled off the same arguments and experts say this consistency is a result of the iron grip that the National Rifle Association (NRA) now has on conservative minds.
“They are the NRA’s talking points” political scientist and researcher of conservative media Dan Cassino said. “If you are a pro-gun-rights politician, the NRA are the most experienced in getting these points out there and they are who you call on.”
The talking points reflect the NRA’s most important goal in the wake of any mass shooting — defer discussion and wait for the media cycle to move on.
This is what they have done in the wake of every high-profile US mass shooting, from Orlando to Oregon.
Part of that is making themselves into a small target and allowing surrogates to muddy the waters.
This is achieved by reframing the conversation around individual rights and nominating other causes for gun violence other than guns — such as mental illness, popular culture or terrorism.
“Currently, the NRA themselves are using the same playbook they have used in the wake of every such incident, which is silence,” Cassino said.
Pointing to the NRA’s Twitter account, which at the time of writing had not tweeted since Sept. 29, Cassino said: “There’s no way to defend gun laws in the wake of a mass shooting, so they don’t.”
“It’s in their interest for the story to die down as quickly as possible and anything they say will give the story life,” he said.
He points to problems which have arisen in the past when the organization deviated from this strategy, like the disastrous post Sandy Hook Elementary School shooting news conference, where NRA executive vice president Wayne LaPierre blamed rap music and video games for creating a “culture of violence” that led to the incident.
The reason that conservative politicians are prepared to carry water for the NRA is that over time, the NRA’s efforts have ensured that they and Republicans speak with the same voice.
“The NRA’s best trick has been establishing support for guns as an essential part of being a Republican,” Cassino said.
While their political donations help, their real strength has come from mobilizing their membership to keep politicians in line.
Roxanne Dunbar-Ortiz, author of the forthcoming book Loaded, On US’ Gun Culture, said progressives often misunderstand the NRA as a money-driven, top-down lobbying organization.
“The secret of the NRA is that it is populist,” Dunbar-Ortiz said. “It is the best-organized grassroots organization in the country.”
The NRA obsessively monitors legislation on Capitol Hill and in statehouses.
When it sees something it does not like, it galvanizes its members to bombard legislators with telephone calls, letters and e-mails.
“What they spend on lobbying is peanuts compared to corporations,” Dunbar-Ortiz said. “Their strength lies in mobilizing their grassroots.”
Those grassroots efforts can and have unseated politicians — including Republicans — who did not toe the line.
Long-term political organizing thus anchors their responses to crisis.
However, so do long-term communication strategies that link guns and gun ownership with white American identity, and masculinity.
Since the 1970s, the NRA has been transformed, partly by a member-driven insurgency, Dunbar-Ortiz said.
The members who took control of the organization in the wake of 1960s and 1970s civil rights movements “thought that the NRA should not be about sports, but about getting white people armed.”
Since then they have crafted a “white nationalist” message to appeal to those people — especially men — who “see themselves as the carriers of the real America, or of the origins of the US itself.”
In the era of US President Donald Trump, the NRA’s messages have taken a darker turn.
A recent ad from the organization, featuring conservative media personality Dana Loesch, raised the prospect of social chaos caused by an unspecified “them.”
Hollywood and liberal politicians, the ad alleged, conspire to “make them march, make them protest, make them scream racism and sexism and xenophobia and homophobia, and smash windows, burn cars, shut down interstates and airports, bully and terrorize the law abiding.”
Cassino said there is a straightforward explanation for the ad, which many saw as openly encouraging violence.
It starts from the fact that while the membership gives the NRA its political heft, its money, and priorities, come from weapons manufacturers.
“The NRA does what the weapons manufacturers want,” he said — and that is to sell more guns.
In the years of former US president Barack Obama, the never-realistic prospect of gun-control measures were enough to drive additional sales, especially in the wake of massacres.
In the Trump era, the Republican lock on government means gun control is a non-starter.
“So if the government is not going to take people’s guns, who is?” Cassino said.
The ad provides an answer by “adopting an alt-right viewpoint,” he said.
“It raises the specter of left-wing groups like Black Lives Matter and Antifa. Chaos is just over the horizon. You need guns to defend yourself against that chaos,” he added.
In the long term, the NRA might return to pushing this message. In the short term, things might remain tricky.
Dunbar-Ortiz thinks that the killer’s target — a country music festival — presents a particular problem for an organization whose “NRA Country” campaign has conducted specific outreach to fans of country music.
“This is white, rural music,” she said — its fan base overlaps considerably with the most enthusiastic supporters of gun rights. “Ordinary people, even gun lovers, might be shaken by this incident. I am sure the NRA is nervous.”
“There’s a moment here where there is an opening to talk to the people who think of themselves as real Americans about gun violence,” she added.
The question in a nation divided over guns is whether anyone will be organized or nimble enough to take that opportunity before the story fades from view.
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
The past few months have seen tremendous strides in India’s journey to develop a vibrant semiconductor and electronics ecosystem. The nation’s established prowess in information technology (IT) has earned it much-needed revenue and prestige across the globe. Now, through the convergence of engineering talent, supportive government policies, an expanding market and technologically adaptive entrepreneurship, India is striving to become part of global electronics and semiconductor supply chains. Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Vision of “Make in India” and “Design in India” has been the guiding force behind the government’s incentive schemes that span skilling, design, fabrication, assembly, testing and packaging, and
As former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) wrapped up his visit to the People’s Republic of China, he received his share of attention. Certainly, the trip must be seen within the full context of Ma’s life, that is, his eight-year presidency, the Sunflower movement and his failed Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement, as well as his eight years as Taipei mayor with its posturing, accusations of money laundering, and ups and downs. Through all that, basic questions stand out: “What drives Ma? What is his end game?” Having observed and commented on Ma for decades, it is all ironically reminiscent of former US president Harry