Beware the evil communists, warn fearful hoax messages spreading on WhatsApp: Should people come to your village offering free blood tests, they are really trying to infect you with HIV.
In some circles in Indonesia it is like the Cold War never ended. Even the military is on board with a paranoid campaign against the old red peril.
Last month, the Indonesian army announced the Suharto-era propaganda film Pengkhianatan G30S/PKI, or Betrayal of the Communists, would be screened across the country.
In the lead-up to Friday, the anniversary of a failed 1965 coup that was blamed on the Indonesian Communist Party, the army said the screenings were crucial to ensure people understood the “correct” version of history.
The epic 1984 propaganda film, which depicts communists as violent savages, is being played in villages, mosques and to the military.
During the Suharto era it was mandatory viewing — aired on state television every Sept. 30 until his downfall in 1998.
As part of this latest offensive, the military has also issued an internal memo to its troops to restrict screenings of Joshua Oppenheimer’s 2014 documentary The Look of Silence.
That film depicts a rather different version of events — one that explores the violence of the Indonesian state.
Historians say that between 1965 and 1966, Muslim youth and paramilitary groups with military backing massacred between 500,000 and 1 million suspected communists across the country.
More than half a century later, that bloody purge remains deeply sensitive. No one has ever been held to account.
It is why the military is attempting to limit Oppenheimer’s film, and why the ghosts of communism continue to be dredged up, even though the ideology has been outlawed there since 1966.
“It is this peculiar situation, in that communism has been exterminated, has been extinct in Indonesia since 1965, and yet it is a country in which communism never really died,” Oppenheimer said of the latest events. “They are stuck in evoking or conjuring the specter of communism to keep people silent and afraid.”
Back in 1965, a time when the “domino theory” on the global spread of communism loomed large, the Indonesian Communist Party was the third-largest of its kind in the world.
Last Saturday 52 years ago, a group calling themselves the 30th September Movement kidnapped and murdered six Indonesian generals. Blamed on the communists, the event led to the rise of Indonesia’s strongman ruler Suharto and the mass bloodletting that ensued.
Each year, there are incidents that expose Indonesia’s ongoing communist phobia — the arrest, for example, of unaware tourists detained for wearing T-shirts with the hammer and sickle logo.
However, the anti-communist paranoia has surged significantly in the past month.
Behind it, say analysts, is the military jockeying for political gain in the lead up to the 2019 presidential election.
“The military always tries to paint themselves as politically neutral,” says Yohanes Sulaiman, a lecturer at General Achmad Yani University in Bandung of the decision to run the public screenings. “But now you have the head of the military basically politicising everything.”
The public screenings this year have also coincided with attacks against purported communists.
In the past month a planned seminar about 1965 at Jakarta’s Legal Aid Institute was met with violent protests by hardliners and rent-a-thugs.
Last week a group established to collect and share stories from 1965 was branded “communist” on social media sites.
And at a rally in the capital on Friday, thousands of protestors gathered at the gates of the parliament to decry a “communist revival.”
Evoking the threat of communism to instill fear has proven very effective in Indonesia in the past, said Yosef Djakababa, a history lecturer and director of the Center for Southeast Asian Studies Indonesia.
“It forces citizens to seek protection from an institution that can be seen as capable of protecting them,” he said. “In the past it was the military that has proven, through this narrative, that they are ones that are able to protect the country from communism.”
In Indonesia, communist ties are still a kind of political kryptonite. A smear campaign that falsely branded then-presidential candidate Joko Widodo as a communist and ethnic Chinese almost cost him the 2014 presidential election.
Last year, a government-organized symposium on the events of 1965 gave some hope the government might finally be ready to face its ugly past.
However, the momentum to officially acknowledge past rights abuses appears to have lost steam.
Even when in recent weeks the Indonesian president suggested the Suharto-era propaganda film be “updated” for millennials, he was quickly shot down.
His coordinating security minister quickly clarified, saying the president did not mean the film’s overall message, the anti-communist narrative, should be changed.
In any case it seems most Indonesian millennials — who have not been forced to watch the film every year — do not think about communism much at all.
Judging by his students, Djakababa said that many in his class could not understand why people would “kill each other over ideas.”
“They can understand that people can kill each other if they fight over resources, like oil for example, energy,” he said. “But for ideology, communism. What is communism?”
Saudi Arabian largesse is flooding Egypt’s cultural scene, but the reception is mixed. Some welcome new “cooperation” between two regional powerhouses, while others fear a hostile takeover by Riyadh. In Cairo, historically the cultural capital of the Arab world, Egyptian Minister of Culture Nevine al-Kilany recently hosted Saudi Arabian General Entertainment Authority chairman Turki al-Sheikh. The deep-pocketed al-Sheikh has emerged as a Medici-like patron for Egypt’s cultural elite, courted by Cairo’s top talent to produce a slew of forthcoming films. A new three-way agreement between al-Sheikh, Kilany and United Media Services — a multi-media conglomerate linked to state intelligence that owns much of
The US and other countries should take concrete steps to confront the threats from Beijing to avoid war, US Representative Mario Diaz-Balart said in an interview with Voice of America on March 13. The US should use “every diplomatic economic tool at our disposal to treat China as what it is... to avoid war,” Diaz-Balart said. Giving an example of what the US could do, he said that it has to be more aggressive in its military sales to Taiwan. Actions by cross-party US lawmakers in the past few years such as meeting with Taiwanese officials in Washington and Taipei, and
Denmark’s “one China” policy more and more resembles Beijing’s “one China” principle. At least, this is how things appear. In recent interactions with the Danish state, such as applying for residency permits, a Taiwanese’s nationality would be listed as “China.” That designation occurs for a Taiwanese student coming to Denmark or a Danish citizen arriving in Denmark with, for example, their Taiwanese partner. Details of this were published on Sunday in an article in the Danish daily Berlingske written by Alexander Sjoberg and Tobias Reinwald. The pretext for this new practice is that Denmark does not recognize Taiwan as a state under
The Republic of China (ROC) on Taiwan has no official diplomatic allies in the EU. With the exception of the Vatican, it has no official allies in Europe at all. This does not prevent the ROC — Taiwan — from having close relations with EU member states and other European countries. The exact nature of the relationship does bear revisiting, if only to clarify what is a very complicated and sensitive idea, the details of which leave considerable room for misunderstanding, misrepresentation and disagreement. Only this week, President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) received members of the European Parliament’s Delegation for Relations