Across emerging economies, the benefits of a “demographic dividend” have become a familiar refrain. Politicians and business leaders alike — be it in India, Nigeria, Pakistan or Tanzania — talk glowingly of how a fast-growing and youthful population will create huge investment opportunities and fuel rapid economic growth.
However, the reality is that in many emerging economies, rapid population growth poses a major threat to economic development and technological progress will make that threat even more severe.
For starters, the term “demographic dividend” is being seriously misused.
The term was originally used to describe a transition in which countries enjoyed both a one-off increase in the working age population and a significant fall in fertility.
That combination produces a high ratio of workers to dependents — both retirees and children — making it easier for high savings to support sufficient investment to drive rapid growth in capital stock.
Meanwhile, rapidly falling fertility ensures that the next generation inherits a large capital stock per capita, and small family size makes it easier to afford high private or public education spending per child, leading to rapid improvements in workforce skills.
South Korea, China and some other East Asian nations have benefited hugely from such a demographic dividend over the past 40 years.
However, without a rapid fall in fertility rates, there is no dividend.
If fertility remains high, a low ratio of retirees to workers is offset by a high child dependency ratio, making it difficult to support high-education spending per child.
If each new cohort of workers is much larger than the one before, growth in per capita capital stock — whether in infrastructure or plant and equipment — is held back.
Rapidly growing working-age populations also make it impossible to create jobs fast enough to prevent widespread underemployment.
SUB-SAHARAN AFRICA
This is the bind in which much of sub-Saharan Africa is still stuck. With moderate GDP growth rates — averaging 4.6 percent over the past decade — offset by 2.7 percent annual population growth, per capita income has been growing at less than 2 percent per year, versus the 7 percent rate that China achieves.
At this rate of progress, Africa will not attain today’s advanced-economy living standards until the mid-2100s.
Pakistan faces a slightly less severe — but still significant — challenge.
India’s demography varies by region: While fertility rates are at or below two in economically dynamic states such as Maharashtra and Gujarat, the big states of Bihar and Uttar Pradesh are still facing severe demographic headwinds.
It has been obvious for decades that high fertility can hold back per capita growth, and the costs of denying that possibility are about to rise, especially for developing nations.
There are only a few historic examples of successful catch-up from poverty to advanced-economy productivity and living standards, and in all cases — Japan in the 1950s to 1980s, South Korea in the 1960s to 1990s, China for the past four decades — rapid growth of export-oriented manufacture has played a central role.
THREAT OF TECHNOLOGY
Technological progress now threatens that route to prosperity.
Information technology will eventually enable automation of the vast majority of jobs.
Despite great uncertainty about how long the transition will take, studies make clear that jobs involving predictable physical activity are the most vulnerable in the short term.
Manufacturing involving hard material handling — think automobile production — is already highly automated and will become more so, but once innovators succeed in creating effective “sewbots” capable of manipulating soft material, many existing jobs in clothing and textile manufacture will also be threatened.
As that happens, manufacturing might return to advanced economies, but with few jobs.
Adidas’ “Speedfactory” in Ansbach, Germany, will soon produce 500,000 shoes per year with only 160 workers.
A International Labor Organization report estimates that 60 to 90 percent of low-paid jobs in textiles and clothing in several Asian nations might be automated away.
However, the biggest challenges will lie not in Southeast Asia, but in parts of India, in Pakistan and above all in Africa.
India must create 10 million to 12 million jobs per year simply to keep pace with the working-age population, and far more to absorb the huge numbers of already-underemployed workers.
However, some of the plans are unrealistic: A report challenges official talk of 10 million new jobs in apparel manufacture, suggesting that 3 million is a more likely scenario.
As for Africa, the UN’s mid-point projection puts the population aged 20 to 65 at 1.3 billion in 2050 and 2.5 billion by 2100, up from 540 million today.
These young people will inhabit a world where only a tiny fraction will ever find work in export-oriented manufacturing.
China’s population of 25-to-64-year-olds, by contrast, faces a possible fall from 930 million to 730 million, driving up real wages and creating powerful incentives for high investment in automation.
TOO MANY, NOT TOO FEW
In a world of radical possibilities for displacing human labor, too many workers will be a far bigger problem than too few.
There are no easy answers to the problems many emerging economies now face. Job creation must be maximized in sectors less vulnerable to near-term automation: Construction and tourism jobs might be more sustainable than manufacturing.
Policies to enable voluntary fertility decline, through female education and easy access to contraception, should be high priorities; Iran, where the fertility rate fell from 6.5 in the 1980s to less than two by 2005, shows what is possible even in supposedly traditional religious societies.
However, the first step toward solving any problem is to acknowledge it. Most talk about demographic dividends is a dangerous exercise in denial. It is time to face reality.
Adair Turner is chairman of the Institute for New Economic Thinking.
Copyright: Project Syndicate
Saudi Arabian largesse is flooding Egypt’s cultural scene, but the reception is mixed. Some welcome new “cooperation” between two regional powerhouses, while others fear a hostile takeover by Riyadh. In Cairo, historically the cultural capital of the Arab world, Egyptian Minister of Culture Nevine al-Kilany recently hosted Saudi Arabian General Entertainment Authority chairman Turki al-Sheikh. The deep-pocketed al-Sheikh has emerged as a Medici-like patron for Egypt’s cultural elite, courted by Cairo’s top talent to produce a slew of forthcoming films. A new three-way agreement between al-Sheikh, Kilany and United Media Services — a multi-media conglomerate linked to state intelligence that owns much of
The US and other countries should take concrete steps to confront the threats from Beijing to avoid war, US Representative Mario Diaz-Balart said in an interview with Voice of America on March 13. The US should use “every diplomatic economic tool at our disposal to treat China as what it is... to avoid war,” Diaz-Balart said. Giving an example of what the US could do, he said that it has to be more aggressive in its military sales to Taiwan. Actions by cross-party US lawmakers in the past few years such as meeting with Taiwanese officials in Washington and Taipei, and
Denmark’s “one China” policy more and more resembles Beijing’s “one China” principle. At least, this is how things appear. In recent interactions with the Danish state, such as applying for residency permits, a Taiwanese’s nationality would be listed as “China.” That designation occurs for a Taiwanese student coming to Denmark or a Danish citizen arriving in Denmark with, for example, their Taiwanese partner. Details of this were published on Sunday in an article in the Danish daily Berlingske written by Alexander Sjoberg and Tobias Reinwald. The pretext for this new practice is that Denmark does not recognize Taiwan as a state under
The Republic of China (ROC) on Taiwan has no official diplomatic allies in the EU. With the exception of the Vatican, it has no official allies in Europe at all. This does not prevent the ROC — Taiwan — from having close relations with EU member states and other European countries. The exact nature of the relationship does bear revisiting, if only to clarify what is a very complicated and sensitive idea, the details of which leave considerable room for misunderstanding, misrepresentation and disagreement. Only this week, President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) received members of the European Parliament’s Delegation for Relations