Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi came to power on a euphoric wave of promises to boost India’s economy, add millions of jobs and bring “good times” to the developing nation.
Three years later, India’s economic prospects look decidedly grimmer. India’s economic expansion has slowed to its lowest level in three years. Small businesses are struggling, or even shutting down, after overhauls of the nation’s currency and sales tax system.
Modi’s own allies warn of a dire outlook, with some raising the specter of an economic depression.
Illustration: Yusha
While government ministers have urged patience, analysts and others in Modi’s governing Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) are not so sanguine about the current trends.
“A hard landing appears inevitable,” BJP lawmaker and former Indian minister of finance Yashwant Sinha said in a stinging commentary on Wednesday in the Indian Express newspaper.
He accused the government of rushing through poorly planned economic reforms, which he said would hobble home-grown businesses for years to come.
“Private investment has shrunk as never before in two decades, industrial production has all but collapsed, agriculture is in distress, construction industry, a big employer of the work force, is in the doldrums ... exports have dwindled,” he said.
Another leading BJP lawmaker, Subramanian Swamy, said India was facing the possibility of a “major depression.”
“The economy is in a tailspin. Yes, it can crash. We need to do a lot of good things to revive the economy. Even a tailspin can be made to steady. If nothing is done, we are heading for a major depression,” he said two weeks ago.
Two weeks ago, the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development scaled back its economic growth forecast for India to 6.7 percent for the 2018 fiscal year, down from 7.3 percent predicted earlier this year.
Other organizations and banks have made similar downward revisions.
Economists have said the country needs to maintain 8 percent growth to add enough jobs for about 12 million young people joining the work force every year.
The warnings have been sobering for Modi, who appointed a new Economic Advisory Council last week to offer him advice independent of the Ministry of Finance.
Economists said that may be too little, too late.
“The rot has set in. I don’t see how the Economic Advisory Committee will help,” said Biswajeet Dhar, an economist with Jawaharlal Nehru University in New Delhi. And “whether the government will act on that advice is yet to be seen.”
India has long been considered a darling market for investors, with high rates of growth and a 1.3 billion population that many companies are eager to reach. Just a year ago, the economy jumped 9.1 percent in the first quarter — temporarily earning the title of world’s fastest growing economy — and has rarely dipped below 6.5 percent since 2013.
Still, Modi rose to popularity partly by hammering the previous government over alleged corruption scandals and poor economic performance.
His campaign slogan of Achhe Din — Hindi for “good times” — helped inspire a mass following across the nation, from university students to business leaders.
For several months after his election in 2014, things looked good. Foreign investment increased with government moves to open up sectors, imports remained cheap thanks to globally depressed oil prices, and economic growth ticked along at rates above 7 percent.
By November last year, the government was confident enough to launch the first of two massive economic reforms.
Without warning, Modi appeared on national television to inform citizens that most of their currency would be worthless in the morning, as the government declared 86 percent of all rupee notes would be replaced with newly designed bills.
The government said the move was aimed at cracking down on tax evasion, corruption and counterfeiting, but with most of the new bills not yet printed, ATMs ran dry for weeks as account holders stood for days in long lines at banks that gave out only limited withdrawals.
Many small, cash-reliant businesses including grocery stores and home-based workshops suffered huge losses or went under.
Just when things were returning to normal this year, Indian businesses were hit with a second upheaval on July 1 — the replacement of a complex system of cascading federal and state taxes with a single goods and services tax (GST).
The government assured citizens the move would boost economic growth by simplifying the existing tax structure. Again, it was mostly small businesses that suffered the most, with many unable to comply with new, thrice-monthly tax filing requirement.
“A badly conceived and poorly implemented GST has played havoc with businesses and sunk many of them,” Sinha said.
Rural Indian villages and towns, where more than half of the country’s population relies on farming for their livelihoods, have fared even worse. Demonetization left many farmers, already among the poorest, unable to buy seeds and fertilizer for the sowing season. Their distress was compounded by two years of poor monsoon rains and drought.
However, economists are most alarmed by the slowdown in manufacturing and construction — two sectors many had assumed would do well under a business-friendly government. Instead, both have seen a sharp rise in unemployment.
“Major employment creators were the small businesses. They are the ones who have been worst hit,” said economist Mihir Sharma of the Observer Research Foundation, a New Delhi-based think tank.
Modi is likely to face increasing pressure on the economy as the next general elections in early 2019 approach.
“Jobs shortages have the potential of impacting the next elections,” Sharma said.
Still, the government remains upbeat, saying that the latest quarterly growth figure of 5.7 percent was still pretty good compared with how other nations were faring.
“The government has taken some very important decisions,” said Indian Minister of Railways Piyush Goyal, who long held the energy portfolio. “Difficulties and criticism will come. But we are confident, and we will stay the course.”
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
Since the Russian invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, people have been asking if Taiwan is the next Ukraine. At a G7 meeting of national leaders in January, Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida warned that Taiwan “could be the next Ukraine” if Chinese aggression is not checked. NATO Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg has said that if Russia is not defeated, then “today, it’s Ukraine, tomorrow it can be Taiwan.” China does not like this rhetoric. Its diplomats ask people to stop saying “Ukraine today, Taiwan tomorrow.” However, the rhetoric and stated ambition of Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) on Taiwan shows strong parallels with