Rattled by rising tensions with North Korea, South Korea is taking extra measures to try to ensure the safety of next year’s Winter Olympics, including setting up a crack cyberdefense team and doubling the number of troops, according to officials and documents reviewed by reporters.
The Games are to take place in February next year in the mountainous resort town of Pyeongchang, just 80km from the heavily fortified border with North Korea.
They come after a series of missile and nuclear tests show the North making rapid advances in its weapons program and as inflammatory rhetoric between Pyongyang and Washington stirs up concerns about another conflict on the Korean Peninsula.
Illustration: Louise Ting
The South Korean Ministry of Defense is to deploy about 5,000 armed forces personnel at the Games, double the 2,400 on duty during the 2002 Soccer World Cup, which South Korea co-hosted with Japan, according to government officials and documents.
Pyeongchang’s organizing committee for next year’s Games (POCOG) is also selecting a private cybersecurity company to guard against a hacking attack from the North, tender documents show.
The committee is seeking to fast-track the selection as tensions rise in the wake of South Korea’s controversial deployment of the US Terminal High Altitude Area Defense (THAAD) anti-missile system and as North Korean leader Kim Jong-un tests weapons at an unprecedented rate.
“Cyberthreats have increased due to external factors such as the THAAD deployment and recent North Korean missile launches,” the committee said in the document.
South Korea has blamed the North for a series of hacking attempts in the last few years, including a 2013 cyberattack against South Korean banks and broadcasters that froze computer systems for more than a week. Pyongyang denied any responsibility.
While South Korea faces unique challenges with its hostile and nuclear-armed neighbor, the level of threats and security to counter them has escalated globally since South Korea last hosted a major international sporting event.
The POCOG is hiring a private security contractor, stipulating the firm should be capable of running around 500 personnel to operate X-ray screening each day during the event, a separate document seen by reporters shows.
It has earmarked 20 billion won (US$17.5 million) for the screening security measures and another 1.3 billion won for the cyber security protection, according to the documents.
An official from the South Korean National Intelligence Service, the nation’s spy agency, is in charge of security operations, working with the government’s anti-terrorism center, the organizing committee’s spokeswoman said.
South Korea has also created a new Special Weapons and Tactics (SWAT) team to guard against terrorism around the Games, Asia’s first Winter Olympics outside Japan.
“We will search Olympic venues to check for bombs, protect athletes and visitors, and guard against any attempts to assassinate key figures,” said Jin Jeong-hyeon, a police inspector from the SWAT team.
In late August, the POCOG held a two-day briefing with major Olympics sponsors, including McDonald’s Corp and Coca-Cola Co, to talk about the measures being put in place, a government statement said.
It gave them a look at emergency evacuation facilities during the briefing, although further details were not disclosed.
While some observers view Pyongyang’s threats as bluster, others point to instances of North Korean aggression during the 2002 Soccer World Cup and ahead of the 1988 Seoul Olympics as reasons to be concerned.
In June 2002, as South Korea prepared to play Turkey in the playoff for third place at the Soccer World Cup, North Korean patrol boats crossed the disputed maritime border and exchanged fire with South Korean vessels, killing six South Korean sailors.
In November 1987, just nine months before South Korea was set to host the Summer Games in Seoul, North Korean agents detonated a bomb on Korean Air Flight 858, killing all 104 passengers and 11 crew.
One of the agents later told investigators the order had come from North Korean leader Kim Jong-il and one of the aims had been to frighten international athletes and visitors from attending the Seoul Olympics.
Other Olympics have also been affected by violence, most notably the killing of 11 Israeli athletes by Palestinian militants at the 1972 Munich Games. Mexican police and military killed hundreds of civilians during a protest just days before the Mexico City Olympics in 1968.
South Korean Minister of Ministry of Culture, Sports and Tourism Do Jong-whan this week said that Seoul was “very concerned about aggressive remarks” traded between Pyongyang and Washington, but did not believe Kim would risk a war against countries participating in the Olympics.
The International Olympics Committee (IOC) is encouraging the participation of North Koreans as athletes, judges or “wild cards” to help ensure the safety of the Olympics, Do added.
Chang Ung, North Korea’s IOC member, earlier this month said that the Pyeongchang Olympics would not be affected by the escalating crisis on the peninsula and that North Korea would hopefully be able to send athletes.
Figure skating, short-track speed skating and Nordic skiing could potentially feature North Korean athletes, he said.
Despite the heightened security measures, there is not a lot that South Korea can do to reassure participants, said Lee Soo-hyuck, a former foreign affairs presidential secretary. “This issue is more about whether North Korea would decide to carry out hostile actions or not.”
Could Asia be on the verge of a new wave of nuclear proliferation? A look back at the early history of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), which recently celebrated its 75th anniversary, illuminates some reasons for concern in the Indo-Pacific today. US Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin recently described NATO as “the most powerful and successful alliance in history,” but the organization’s early years were not without challenges. At its inception, the signing of the North Atlantic Treaty marked a sea change in American strategic thinking. The United States had been intent on withdrawing from Europe in the years following
My wife and I spent the week in the interior of Taiwan where Shuyuan spent her childhood. In that town there is a street that functions as an open farmer’s market. Walk along that street, as Shuyuan did yesterday, and it is next to impossible to come home empty-handed. Some mangoes that looked vaguely like others we had seen around here ended up on our table. Shuyuan told how she had bought them from a little old farmer woman from the countryside who said the mangoes were from a very old tree she had on her property. The big surprise
The issue of China’s overcapacity has drawn greater global attention recently, with US Secretary of the Treasury Janet Yellen urging Beijing to address its excess production in key industries during her visit to China last week. Meanwhile in Brussels, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen last week said that Europe must have a tough talk with China on its perceived overcapacity and unfair trade practices. The remarks by Yellen and Von der Leyen come as China’s economy is undergoing a painful transition. Beijing is trying to steer the world’s second-largest economy out of a COVID-19 slump, the property crisis and
As former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) wrapped up his visit to the People’s Republic of China, he received his share of attention. Certainly, the trip must be seen within the full context of Ma’s life, that is, his eight-year presidency, the Sunflower movement and his failed Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement, as well as his eight years as Taipei mayor with its posturing, accusations of money laundering, and ups and downs. Through all that, basic questions stand out: “What drives Ma? What is his end game?” Having observed and commented on Ma for decades, it is all ironically reminiscent of former US president Harry