Not too long ago, the only journalists working in conflict areas who might be afforded protection were those working for wealthy, predominantly Western news organizations.
These journalists would attend expensive courses run by former special forces personnel, who trained them to navigate hostile environments. They would be furnished with flak jackets and helmets, and given first aid kits.
However, journalists elsewhere have rarely benefited from this culture of safety. From Mexico and Brazil to Pakistan and Somalia, journalists are often murdered with impunity.
More often than not, when the messenger is silenced, so is the message.
For the past 15 years, the International News Safety Institute has been collating a list of journalists who have died on the job.
What we have found is shocking: For every 10 reporters killed, nine died while on assignment in their home country. Countless others have had to abandon their homes, jobs and countries. Those who do stay often live in constant fear for their safety.
In places where corrupt regimes or militant groups want to control the flow of information, journalists have long had to risk being kidnapped or killed, but in recent years, this threat has become so great that some countries are effectively no-go zones for international media organizations.
Western correspondents are aware of these risks when they travel abroad to cover active war zones, but now they confront similar dangers at home.
Wherever journalists work — whether online or offline — they need to be mindful of more physical, psychological and digital risks than ever before.
Terrorist attacks have affected news organizations, particularly in Europe, in unexpected ways.
Many of those who arrived first at the scene of the Manchester Arena bombing or the massacre at the Bataclan concert hall in Paris had not received the physical training for such eventualities, nor were they emotionally prepared to cover stories where they would be exposed to that degree of trauma.
In response to these events, some newsrooms have started preparing for what they will do if a domestic terrorist attack directly affects their operations.
Organizations — including the BBC, the Dutch public service broadcaster NOS and others across Europe — have plans in place for journalists responding to incidents in their home cities or those directly targeting their newsrooms.
Beyond bullets and bombs, journalists also face increasing psychological threats at home.
In July, a report I coauthored for the International News Safety Institute put a name to one such threat, a phenomenon known as “moral injury.”
The report, published by the Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism at the University of Oxford, examined the effects of covering the refugee crisis in Europe on members of the media.
Reporting on a traumatic story, we found, can have a profound effect on a journalist’s mental health.
Our research found that feelings of guilt and helplessness can be overwhelming when events “transgress personal moral and ethical values or codes of conduct.”
To guard against the risks of moral injury, we highlighted the importance of education, saying: “Journalists need to understand that this is the ‘new’ terrain, part of the mental landscape of the profession.”
Our report also said that organizations should look to provide support to those who need it, bearing in mind that people respond to and recover from trauma in different ways.
In the US, journalists face another kind of psychological threat: harassment from their own government.
Although journalists are protected by the First Amendment of the US Constitution, US President Donald Trump has nevertheless used his social-media bully pulpit to vilify the entire news media.
Trump’s disdain for free speech mirrors that of authoritarian governments, from Turkey to the Philippines, where journalists have been arrested, imprisoned and harassed in record numbers.
Journalists are also increasingly vulnerable online, where anonymity has created a culture of trolling and harassment. Female journalists have had to bear the brunt of digital attacks, which can rapidly escalate into threats of sexual violence.
In response, many journalists have abandoned social media and others have left the profession altogether.
The world is a risky place for journalists, which is precisely why we must do everything that we can to protect them.
Never before has the role of journalism been so important. In today’s noisy, confusing, multi-channel news landscape, where “fake news” is sold as fact, we need accountable, analytical, responsible reporting more than ever.
A free press delivers truth, holds power to account and calls out threats to liberty and justice, but the press can never be free if its members are not kept safe.
Hannah Storm is director of the International News Safety Institute.
Copyright: Project Syndicate
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
The past few months have seen tremendous strides in India’s journey to develop a vibrant semiconductor and electronics ecosystem. The nation’s established prowess in information technology (IT) has earned it much-needed revenue and prestige across the globe. Now, through the convergence of engineering talent, supportive government policies, an expanding market and technologically adaptive entrepreneurship, India is striving to become part of global electronics and semiconductor supply chains. Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Vision of “Make in India” and “Design in India” has been the guiding force behind the government’s incentive schemes that span skilling, design, fabrication, assembly, testing and packaging, and
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.