Not too long ago, the only journalists working in conflict areas who might be afforded protection were those working for wealthy, predominantly Western news organizations.
These journalists would attend expensive courses run by former special forces personnel, who trained them to navigate hostile environments. They would be furnished with flak jackets and helmets, and given first aid kits.
However, journalists elsewhere have rarely benefited from this culture of safety. From Mexico and Brazil to Pakistan and Somalia, journalists are often murdered with impunity.
More often than not, when the messenger is silenced, so is the message.
For the past 15 years, the International News Safety Institute has been collating a list of journalists who have died on the job.
What we have found is shocking: For every 10 reporters killed, nine died while on assignment in their home country. Countless others have had to abandon their homes, jobs and countries. Those who do stay often live in constant fear for their safety.
In places where corrupt regimes or militant groups want to control the flow of information, journalists have long had to risk being kidnapped or killed, but in recent years, this threat has become so great that some countries are effectively no-go zones for international media organizations.
Western correspondents are aware of these risks when they travel abroad to cover active war zones, but now they confront similar dangers at home.
Wherever journalists work — whether online or offline — they need to be mindful of more physical, psychological and digital risks than ever before.
Terrorist attacks have affected news organizations, particularly in Europe, in unexpected ways.
Many of those who arrived first at the scene of the Manchester Arena bombing or the massacre at the Bataclan concert hall in Paris had not received the physical training for such eventualities, nor were they emotionally prepared to cover stories where they would be exposed to that degree of trauma.
In response to these events, some newsrooms have started preparing for what they will do if a domestic terrorist attack directly affects their operations.
Organizations — including the BBC, the Dutch public service broadcaster NOS and others across Europe — have plans in place for journalists responding to incidents in their home cities or those directly targeting their newsrooms.
Beyond bullets and bombs, journalists also face increasing psychological threats at home.
In July, a report I coauthored for the International News Safety Institute put a name to one such threat, a phenomenon known as “moral injury.”
The report, published by the Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism at the University of Oxford, examined the effects of covering the refugee crisis in Europe on members of the media.
Reporting on a traumatic story, we found, can have a profound effect on a journalist’s mental health.
Our research found that feelings of guilt and helplessness can be overwhelming when events “transgress personal moral and ethical values or codes of conduct.”
To guard against the risks of moral injury, we highlighted the importance of education, saying: “Journalists need to understand that this is the ‘new’ terrain, part of the mental landscape of the profession.”
Our report also said that organizations should look to provide support to those who need it, bearing in mind that people respond to and recover from trauma in different ways.
In the US, journalists face another kind of psychological threat: harassment from their own government.
Although journalists are protected by the First Amendment of the US Constitution, US President Donald Trump has nevertheless used his social-media bully pulpit to vilify the entire news media.
Trump’s disdain for free speech mirrors that of authoritarian governments, from Turkey to the Philippines, where journalists have been arrested, imprisoned and harassed in record numbers.
Journalists are also increasingly vulnerable online, where anonymity has created a culture of trolling and harassment. Female journalists have had to bear the brunt of digital attacks, which can rapidly escalate into threats of sexual violence.
In response, many journalists have abandoned social media and others have left the profession altogether.
The world is a risky place for journalists, which is precisely why we must do everything that we can to protect them.
Never before has the role of journalism been so important. In today’s noisy, confusing, multi-channel news landscape, where “fake news” is sold as fact, we need accountable, analytical, responsible reporting more than ever.
A free press delivers truth, holds power to account and calls out threats to liberty and justice, but the press can never be free if its members are not kept safe.
Hannah Storm is director of the International News Safety Institute.
Copyright: Project Syndicate
Saudi Arabian largesse is flooding Egypt’s cultural scene, but the reception is mixed. Some welcome new “cooperation” between two regional powerhouses, while others fear a hostile takeover by Riyadh. In Cairo, historically the cultural capital of the Arab world, Egyptian Minister of Culture Nevine al-Kilany recently hosted Saudi Arabian General Entertainment Authority chairman Turki al-Sheikh. The deep-pocketed al-Sheikh has emerged as a Medici-like patron for Egypt’s cultural elite, courted by Cairo’s top talent to produce a slew of forthcoming films. A new three-way agreement between al-Sheikh, Kilany and United Media Services — a multi-media conglomerate linked to state intelligence that owns much of
The US and other countries should take concrete steps to confront the threats from Beijing to avoid war, US Representative Mario Diaz-Balart said in an interview with Voice of America on March 13. The US should use “every diplomatic economic tool at our disposal to treat China as what it is... to avoid war,” Diaz-Balart said. Giving an example of what the US could do, he said that it has to be more aggressive in its military sales to Taiwan. Actions by cross-party US lawmakers in the past few years such as meeting with Taiwanese officials in Washington and Taipei, and
The Republic of China (ROC) on Taiwan has no official diplomatic allies in the EU. With the exception of the Vatican, it has no official allies in Europe at all. This does not prevent the ROC — Taiwan — from having close relations with EU member states and other European countries. The exact nature of the relationship does bear revisiting, if only to clarify what is a very complicated and sensitive idea, the details of which leave considerable room for misunderstanding, misrepresentation and disagreement. Only this week, President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) received members of the European Parliament’s Delegation for Relations
Denmark’s “one China” policy more and more resembles Beijing’s “one China” principle. At least, this is how things appear. In recent interactions with the Danish state, such as applying for residency permits, a Taiwanese’s nationality would be listed as “China.” That designation occurs for a Taiwanese student coming to Denmark or a Danish citizen arriving in Denmark with, for example, their Taiwanese partner. Details of this were published on Sunday in an article in the Danish daily Berlingske written by Alexander Sjoberg and Tobias Reinwald. The pretext for this new practice is that Denmark does not recognize Taiwan as a state under