The trial against Taiwanese human rights activist Lee Ming-che (李明哲), who has now been detained in China for 171 days, is scheduled to begin in the Intermediate People’s Court in the city of Yueyang today.
If this case becomes a precedent, Taiwanese in China will be under constant risk of having their personal freedoms restricted.
According to the first paragraph of Article 105 of the Chinese Criminal Code: “Whoever organizes, plots, or acts to subvert the political power of the state and overthrow the socialist system, the ringleaders or those whose crimes are grave are to be sentenced to life imprisonment, or not less than 10 years of fixed-term imprisonment; active participants are to be sentenced from not less than three years to not more than 10 years of fixed-term imprisonment; other participants are to be sentenced to not more than three years of fixed-term imprisonment, criminal detention, control, or deprivation of political rights.”
The second paragraph states that whoever instigates a subversion of the state is to be given a prison sentence of five years or less, while the leaders and those whose crimes are grave are to be sentenced to a minimum of five years in prison.
The offense of instigating and actively participating in subverting state power and overthrowing the socialist system is defined as organizing or plotting such an action or spreading rumors, all of which are ambiguous legal concepts.
This offense has become an effective way of restricting free speech and the freedom of expression.
This is why even Nobel Peace Prize laureate Liu Xiaobo (劉曉波) was convicted of this offense after writing the Charter 08 document, and kept in prison and under hospital arrest until his death.
Both Chinese and foreigners can be convicted of subverting and overthrowing state power. However, a foreigner who has been arrested, tried and convicted in terms of this offense would likely be deported in accordance with Article 35 of the Criminal Code, and so a conviction would not lead to the foreigner receiving a practical punishment.
However, because Beijing does not consider Taiwanese to be foreigners, they would not be deported. Taiwanese would have to serve out the prison sentence.
Article 8 stipulates: “This law may be applicable to foreigners, who outside PRC territory, commit crimes against the PRC state or against its citizens, provided that this law stipulates a minimum sentence of not less than a three-year fixed term of imprisonment for such crimes; but an exception is to be made if a crime is not punishable according the law of the place where it was committed.”
Other countries, especially those that emphasize protecting human rights, rarely have such an offense on their books, which makes it difficult for China to legally pin that offense on a foreigner.
However, because Taiwanese are not foreigners in China’s eyes, if Taiwanese who in Taiwan advocate Taiwanese independence or even criticize the Chinese government by word or deed, travel to China, they could be arrested and sentenced for the offense of instigating and actively participating in the subversion of Chinese state power.
This is why Taiwanese should throw their strongest support behind Lee Ming-che and also why the government must stop hiding its head in the sand — kowtowing to an authoritarian government will only result in more and greater injustices.
Wu Ching-chin is an associate professor at Aletheia University’s law department.
Translated by Perry Svensson
Could Asia be on the verge of a new wave of nuclear proliferation? A look back at the early history of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), which recently celebrated its 75th anniversary, illuminates some reasons for concern in the Indo-Pacific today. US Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin recently described NATO as “the most powerful and successful alliance in history,” but the organization’s early years were not without challenges. At its inception, the signing of the North Atlantic Treaty marked a sea change in American strategic thinking. The United States had been intent on withdrawing from Europe in the years following
My wife and I spent the week in the interior of Taiwan where Shuyuan spent her childhood. In that town there is a street that functions as an open farmer’s market. Walk along that street, as Shuyuan did yesterday, and it is next to impossible to come home empty-handed. Some mangoes that looked vaguely like others we had seen around here ended up on our table. Shuyuan told how she had bought them from a little old farmer woman from the countryside who said the mangoes were from a very old tree she had on her property. The big surprise
Ursula K. le Guin in The Ones Who Walked Away from Omelas proposed a thought experiment of a utopian city whose existence depended on one child held captive in a dungeon. When taken to extremes, Le Guin suggests, utilitarian logic violates some of our deepest moral intuitions. Even the greatest social goods — peace, harmony and prosperity — are not worth the sacrifice of an innocent person. Former president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁), since leaving office, has lived an odyssey that has brought him to lows like Le Guin’s dungeon. From late 2008 to 2015 he was imprisoned, much of this
The issue of China’s overcapacity has drawn greater global attention recently, with US Secretary of the Treasury Janet Yellen urging Beijing to address its excess production in key industries during her visit to China last week. Meanwhile in Brussels, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen last week said that Europe must have a tough talk with China on its perceived overcapacity and unfair trade practices. The remarks by Yellen and Von der Leyen come as China’s economy is undergoing a painful transition. Beijing is trying to steer the world’s second-largest economy out of a COVID-19 slump, the property crisis and