There are two competing political ideas in Taiwan.
The first is Taiwanese independence, or the Democratic Progressive Party’s (DPP) view that Taiwan is an independent nation that happens to be named the Republic of China (ROC).
The second is ROC independence, or the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) view that the independent nation of the ROC is located on Taiwan.
Taiwan and the People’s Republic of China (PRC) are divided by the Taiwan Strait, which helps maintain the “status quo,” while historically, “Chineseness” lingers in the Constitution.
Taiwanese independence, ROC independence and the PRC form a complex triangular relationship. The same is true for the relationship between the DPP, the KMT and the Chinese Communist Party (CCP).
The division between the DPP and the KMT is an internal division that is likely to be smaller than the division between the DPP and KMT on the one hand and the CCP on the other.
However, the division between Taiwanese and ROC independence has made the divide between them greater than the one between the KMT and the CCP. This is blocking national reconstruction — the KMT blocks localization and ignores the significance of democratization to Taiwan’s development.
The KMT’s ideology is mostly controlled by older party members who fled to Taiwan in 1949, but its main supporters are local politicians, military personnel and public servants. The party ruled Taiwan as a dictatorship and did not allow elections until democratization forced it to.
KMT Chairman Wu Den-yih (吳敦義) has been a member of the KMT since the time of the party-state. The politically savvy and pragmatic Wu is hoping to be the nation’s next president.
He is trying to please both Taiwan and China, but his “‘one China,’ with each side having its own interpretation” platform is designed to fool Taiwanese.
Wu hopes that the platform will win him support from the CCP while still promoting ROC independence.
However, the ROC does not exist for the PRC. Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) lukewarm response to Wu’s platform disappointed the KMT, but many party members prefer to throw their lot in with the authoritarian CCP, because they view Taiwan as nothing but a colony.
After taking over Taiwan, the KMT focused on “reconquering the mainland.” Had it not been for the UN’s decision to recognize the PRC and democratization, Taiwan would not have escaped the party’s authoritarian control.
Today’s KMT wants to abandon the ROC independence built by Chiang Kai-shek (蔣介石) by offering Taiwan to China in the hope of being appointed its ruler.
Taiwanese have seen through the KMT’s ruses and will not support them. The KMT has even used the protests against pension reform as an opportunity to challenge President Tsai Ing-wen’s (蔡英文) administration, even though the old pension schemes were an unhealthy product of the KMT’s party-state system.
The DPP believes that Taiwan and the PRC are two separate nations, but it still has to accept the national title “ROC” — which China does not acknowledge — and maintain the “status quo” as it waits for the right conditions to create a Taiwanese nation, since democracy is not sufficient to do so.
Still, Taiwanese independence is very different from ROC independence. Though fettered by the name “Chinese Taipei,” the nation must still seek independence and strive to be known as “Taiwan” to build the conditions for nationhood.
Only by discarding ROC independence and seeking Taiwanese independence will the nation be able to sever its ties with colonial political structures and move toward Taiwanese independence and a new Taiwanese state.
Lee Min-yung is a poet.
Translated by Tu Yu-an
For the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), China’s “century of humiliation” is the gift that keeps on giving. Beijing returns again and again to the theme of Western imperialism, oppression and exploitation to keep stoking the embers of grievance and resentment against the West, and especially the US. However, the People’s Republic of China (PRC) that in 1949 announced it had “stood up” soon made clear what that would mean for Chinese and the world — and it was not an agenda that would engender pride among ordinary Chinese, or peace of mind in the international community. At home, Mao Zedong (毛澤東) launched
The restructuring of supply chains, particularly in the semiconductor industry, was an essential part of discussions last week between Taiwan and a US delegation led by US Undersecretary of State for Economic Growth, Energy and the Environment Keith Krach. It took precedent over the highly anticipated subject of bilateral trade partnerships, and Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC) founder Morris Chang’s (張忠謀) appearance on Friday at a dinner hosted by President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) for Krach was a subtle indicator of this. Chang was in photographs posted by Tsai on Facebook after the dinner, but no details about their discussions were disclosed. With
To say that this year has been eventful for China and the rest of the world would be something of an understatement. First, the US-China trade dispute, already simmering for two years, reached a boiling point as Washington tightened the noose around China’s economy. Second, China unleashed the COVID-19 pandemic on the world, wreaking havoc on an unimaginable scale and turning the People’s Republic of China into a common target of international scorn. Faced with a mounting crisis at home, Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) rashly decided to ratchet up military tensions with neighboring countries in a misguided attempt to divert the
Toward the end of former president Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) final term in office, there was much talk about his legacy. Ma himself would likely prefer history books to enshrine his achievements in reducing cross-strait tensions. He might see his meeting with Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) in Singapore in 2015 as the high point. However, given his statements in the past few months, he might be remembered more for contributing to the breakup of the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT). We are still talking about Ma and his legacy because it is inextricably tied to the so-called “1992 consensus” as the bedrock of his