Reuters, STELLENBOSCH, South Africa
A budget bank is booming in South Africa’s economic slump, challenging the decades-long dominance of the “big four” lenders and prompting a price war that is driving down banking costs in a country where many people cannot afford an account.
Capitec Bank has doubled its customer numbers over the past five years and quadrupled in market value, even as South Africa’s economic growth has stalled and the country has slid into recession, squeezing household incomes.
It offers a single “no-frills” bank account with low fees, as well as unsecured loans to customers including low-income borrowers, but steers clear of the more complex financial products offered by rivals.
This model has insulated it from the downturn, which has constrained mortgage lending and vehicle finance, key business areas for the four biggest banks: Standard Bank, FirstRand, Barclays Africa and Nedbank.
Those four heavyweights have reigned unchallenged over South Africa’s financial sector since the 1990s.
However, Capitec, whose shares have risen more than 300 percent since 2012 and over 30 percent this year, now has a market value of 103 billion rand (US$7.96 billion) — closing in on Nedbank, the number four lender, which is worth 110 billion rand.
The Stellenbosch-based bank, which launched in 2001, has 9 million customers, of which 4 million are so-called primary clients who have their salaries deposited into these accounts.
“Most of them we’ve taken from other banks,” Capitec chief executive Gerrie Fourie said in an interview, adding that his bank attracts 100,000 to 150,000 new customers a month.
“The economy is helping us,” he added. “People have started questioning why they have to pay banking costs.”
There are clear risks to the bank’s business model of offering unsecured loans to lower-income borrowers without any other forms of lending to counter any losses, industry experts have said.
Capitec’s rise is nonetheless forcing its rivals to respond. They are all fighting back with their own no-frills accounts aimed at hard-pressed consumers.
This is pushing down the cost of banking in South Africa — a significant development in a country where only around half of a population of 55 million has bank accounts, according to Nielsen research, partly because of the charges involved.
Bank fees for deposits, withdrawals, transfers and administration have for years largely ranged between 100 and 250 rand a month, but can rise as high as 450 — a stiff price in a country where the minimum wage is 20 rand an hour.
Nedbank has reduced the administration fees for its most basic account to Capitec’s level of 5.50 rand a month and also lowered transaction costs. It now offers bank accounts that are about half the price of five years ago.
Nedbank chief executive Mike Brown said it was focusing strongly on entry-level banking and was looking to that segment for customer growth.
The other big banks have gone even further, more than halving their fees for their most basic accounts over the past five years to undercut Capitec.
FirstRand’s FNB arm now offers an account with a monthly fee of 5.25, Standard Bank runs one for 4.99 rand per month, while Barclays Africa’s Absa division offers 4.95 rand.
Standard Bank’s co-chief executive Ben Kruger said it needed to be able to respond nimbly to counterlean new entrants like Capitec, who have been able to enter the market without the stifling processes established banks have inherited from their paper-based legacy systems.
“Capitec is gaining market share in the bottom end and the middle of the market and they are increasingly becoming more aggressive in business banking,” said Standard Bank’s other co-chief executive, Sim Tshabalala.
FirstRand, the largest banking group with a market value of 318 billion rand, has 7.7 million customers through its FNB arm; Standard Bank, valued at 276 billion rand, has 12 million; Barclays Africa, which is worth 128 billion rand, has 9.4 million through Absa; and Nedbank has 5.7 million.
Nestled in the vineyards of the Western Cape, far from South Africa’s financial hub of Johannesburg, Capitec has enjoyed a rapid rise since it launched 16 years ago. The biggest growth came during the economic downturn of the past five years, both in terms of customers and market value.
“Capitec came from zero to being a big player,” Old Mutual Global Emerging Markets head Feroz Basa said. “It’s centered around this low-cost model, that’s how they are gaining market share.”
The retail bank has also been swiftly expanding its branch network, adding 76 last year to reach more than 800, compared with Absa’s 719, Standard’s 630, FNB’s 645 and Nedbank’s 513.
The bank’s growing deposit base has narrowed its own cost of funding significantly, Arqaam Capital analysts Jaap Meijer and Leen Antonios said in a note, adding that they expect it to generate higher-than-expected revenues in the next few years.
However, in terms of risks, the amount of Capitec’s loans in arrears at the end of December were up 24 percent compared with a year earlier at 2.86 billion rand, outstripping the 11 percent growth rate of its interest income.
Unlike its rivals, the bank offers only unsecured loans and cannot count on other lending areas such as mortgages to counter any losses. The company is due to report half-year results at the end of September.
“The other banks might have a bit of a moat by having vehicle finance, housing loans and bonds and higher value loans,” Momentum SP Reid banking analyst Brian Mugabe said. “Their [Capitec’s] biggest challenge comes as they move up the value chain.”
Nonetheless, as the price war for low-income customers gears up, Capitec warned its bigger competitors that it plans to climb the income ladder — but not all the way up.
“We designed this bank to service 90 to 95 percent of South Africa’s banking public,” Fourie said. “The wealthiest 5 to 10 percent of the population we leave for the guys offering private banking services.”
For the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), China’s “century of humiliation” is the gift that keeps on giving. Beijing returns again and again to the theme of Western imperialism, oppression and exploitation to keep stoking the embers of grievance and resentment against the West, and especially the US. However, the People’s Republic of China (PRC) that in 1949 announced it had “stood up” soon made clear what that would mean for Chinese and the world — and it was not an agenda that would engender pride among ordinary Chinese, or peace of mind in the international community. At home, Mao Zedong (毛澤東) launched
With a new White House document in May — the “Strategic Approach to the People’s Republic of China” — the administration of US President Donald Trump has firmly set its hyper-competitive line to tackle geoeconomic and geostrategic rivalry, followed by several reinforcing speeches by Trump and other Cabinet-level officials. By identifying China as a near-equal rival, the strategy resonates well with the bipartisan consensus on China in today’s severely divided US. In the face of China’s rapidly growing aggression, the move is long overdue, yet relevant for the maintenance of the international “status quo.” The strategy seems to herald a new
To say that this year has been eventful for China and the rest of the world would be something of an understatement. First, the US-China trade dispute, already simmering for two years, reached a boiling point as Washington tightened the noose around China’s economy. Second, China unleashed the COVID-19 pandemic on the world, wreaking havoc on an unimaginable scale and turning the People’s Republic of China into a common target of international scorn. Faced with a mounting crisis at home, Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) rashly decided to ratchet up military tensions with neighboring countries in a misguided attempt to divert the
The restructuring of supply chains, particularly in the semiconductor industry, was an essential part of discussions last week between Taiwan and a US delegation led by US Undersecretary of State for Economic Growth, Energy and the Environment Keith Krach. It took precedent over the highly anticipated subject of bilateral trade partnerships, and Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC) founder Morris Chang’s (張忠謀) appearance on Friday at a dinner hosted by President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) for Krach was a subtle indicator of this. Chang was in photographs posted by Tsai on Facebook after the dinner, but no details about their discussions were disclosed. With