Anyone who believes there is a quick fix for South Africa’s political and financial malaise when South African President Jacob Zuma leaves office in 2019 needs to think again.
His successor will inherit an economy that slid into recession in the first quarter, mismanaged state companies that are bleeding cash and a network of officials implicated in looting taxpayer funds.
Efforts to reignite growth and rein in a 27.7 percent unemployment rate will be hamstrung by the South African National Treasury’s commitment to curb public debt, which has more than tripled to 2 trillion rand (US$153 billion) since Zuma came to power eight years ago.
Illustration: June hsu
“The whole process of fixing South Africa is probably going to take the best part of a decade,” said Andre Duvenhage, a political science professor at North-West University in Potchefstroom, west of Johannesburg. “This is not going to be an easy job. We are in for a long, difficult struggle.”
Zuma’s second and final term as president is due to end in 2019, but his political clout is waning as he prepares to relinquish leadership of the African National Congress (ANC) in December and, depending on who replaces him, he could be forced to step down early.
Most investors are rooting for South African Deputy President Cyril Ramaphosa, a former labor union leader who helped draft the nation’s first democratic constitution and made a fortune in business.
His main rival is former African Union Commission chairwoman Nkosazana Dlamini-Zuma, Jacob Zuma’s ex-wife. Parliamentary Speaker Baleka Mbete, Human Settlements Minister Lindiwe Sisulu and former ANC treasurer-general Mathews Phosa have also said they intend running for the post.
On the campaign trail, Ramaphosa, 64, has emphasized the need for economic growth, while Dlamini-Zuma, 68, has echoed Zuma’s calls for “radical economic transformation” to address racially based income disparities that date back to white-minority rule.
Whoever wins has to halt the plunder of state resources, according to former South African finance minister Pravin Gordhan, who Zuma fired in March in a move that prompted two ratings companies to downgrade the nation’s foreign-currency debt to junk.
DAMAGED ECONOMY
“You can talk about radical this or radical that, it doesn’t really matter. Every single day that we allow the current trajectory to continue, there is huge damage that is caused,” Gordhan said in a panel discussion in Cape Town last month.
With a different leadership approach “we can turn this country around in six months, not in terms of achieving five percent growth, but building a platform on which that process can actually begin,” he said.
The central bank expects the economy to expand 0.5 percent this year and 1.2 percent next year.
Zuma’s successor could lift the growth rate to 3 percent within two years by bolstering investor confidence and addressing regulatory uncertainty, but the state will have little scope to provide stimulus itself, said Lumkile Monde, an economics lecturer at the University of Witwatersrand in Johannesburg.
“The new administration will have to adopt very prudent fiscal policies to ensure that we can service the debt we have accumulated and also send a message to society that we cannot live beyond our means,” he said. “It’s going to be a long haul and will require lots of sacrifices and bold leadership, not only from the state, but also from business and broader society.”
WEAK GROWTH
Weaker-than-expected economic growth is likely to curb tax revenue this year, making it difficult for the Treasury to meet its target of slashing the budget gap to less than 3 percent of GDP. After having raised tax rates for two of the last three years, the government might have to lower spending to stop the deficit from widening.
Scandals, policy missteps and controversial appointments have been the hallmarks of Zuma’s tenure and caused deep divisions within the ANC.
The nation’s graft ombudsman in a November report alleged that he allowed members of the wealthy Gupta family, who are in business with his son, to influence Cabinet appointments and the award of state contracts.
A study released in March by a team of academics concluded that Zuma, the Guptas and their allies had orchestrated “a silent coup,” securing control over key positions in the state, enabling them to allegedly steal billions of rand.
Zuma and the Guptas deny wrongdoing.
STATE COMPANIES
Power utility Eskom Holdings SOC Ltd and port and rail operator Transnet SOC Ltd are among state companies that have been caught up in the scandal. Reports by the graft ombudsman and the academics implicated some of their top management and board members in aiding the alleged looting. Both companies have said they are investigating the accusations.
South Africa must undertake major structural reforms, including imposing greater fiscal discipline, selling inefficient state companies and shrinking the state’s role in the economy if it is to put itself back on track, said Steve Hanke, a professor of applied economics at Johns Hopkins University in Baltimore.
“The current trajectory is just that sinking feeling,” Hanke said by phone. “If you had a clear agenda for reform and followed through, I think South Africa would just boom. They could easily double their GDP per capita over roughly 15 to 20 years.”
Saudi Arabian largesse is flooding Egypt’s cultural scene, but the reception is mixed. Some welcome new “cooperation” between two regional powerhouses, while others fear a hostile takeover by Riyadh. In Cairo, historically the cultural capital of the Arab world, Egyptian Minister of Culture Nevine al-Kilany recently hosted Saudi Arabian General Entertainment Authority chairman Turki al-Sheikh. The deep-pocketed al-Sheikh has emerged as a Medici-like patron for Egypt’s cultural elite, courted by Cairo’s top talent to produce a slew of forthcoming films. A new three-way agreement between al-Sheikh, Kilany and United Media Services — a multi-media conglomerate linked to state intelligence that owns much of
The US and other countries should take concrete steps to confront the threats from Beijing to avoid war, US Representative Mario Diaz-Balart said in an interview with Voice of America on March 13. The US should use “every diplomatic economic tool at our disposal to treat China as what it is... to avoid war,” Diaz-Balart said. Giving an example of what the US could do, he said that it has to be more aggressive in its military sales to Taiwan. Actions by cross-party US lawmakers in the past few years such as meeting with Taiwanese officials in Washington and Taipei, and
The Republic of China (ROC) on Taiwan has no official diplomatic allies in the EU. With the exception of the Vatican, it has no official allies in Europe at all. This does not prevent the ROC — Taiwan — from having close relations with EU member states and other European countries. The exact nature of the relationship does bear revisiting, if only to clarify what is a very complicated and sensitive idea, the details of which leave considerable room for misunderstanding, misrepresentation and disagreement. Only this week, President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) received members of the European Parliament’s Delegation for Relations
Denmark’s “one China” policy more and more resembles Beijing’s “one China” principle. At least, this is how things appear. In recent interactions with the Danish state, such as applying for residency permits, a Taiwanese’s nationality would be listed as “China.” That designation occurs for a Taiwanese student coming to Denmark or a Danish citizen arriving in Denmark with, for example, their Taiwanese partner. Details of this were published on Sunday in an article in the Danish daily Berlingske written by Alexander Sjoberg and Tobias Reinwald. The pretext for this new practice is that Denmark does not recognize Taiwan as a state under