Military and climate experts, including a former chief of the Australian Defence Force, have warned that Australia faces potential “disastrous consequences” from climate change, including “revolving” natural disasters and the forced migration of tens of millions of people across the region, overwhelming security forces and government.
Former defense force chief Admiral Chris Barrie, now an adjunct professor at the Australian National University’s Strategic and Defence Studies Centre, said in a submission to a Senate inquiry that Australia’s ability to mitigate and respond to the effects of climate change had been corrupted by political timidity.
“Australia’s climate change credentials have suffered from a serious lack of political leadership,” he said.
Illustration: Yusha
The inquiry into the security ramifications of climate change also heard from some of the nation’s leading climate scientists, who warned that the security threats posed by climate change had been underestimated and complained that Australia had been “walking away” from exactly the type of research that would help the country prepare.
However, other experts counseled against “alarmist” predictions and said the focus of the climate change response should be on those people most acutely affected by it, rather than the security concerns of developed nations most able to respond.
Barrie said the security threat of climate change was comparable to that posed by nuclear war and said the Australian continent would be most affected by the changing climate.
“We will suffer great effects from these changes, such as new weather patterns; droughts, sea-level rises and storm surges, because we have substantial urban infrastructure built on the coastal fringe; ravages of more intense and more frequent heatwaves; and tropical revolving storms,” Barrie said.
However, he said the existential effects of climate change were likely to be first — and most severely — felt across Australia’s region, the Asia-Pacific rim, the most populous region in the world, and one that will be home to 7 billion people by 2050.
Barrie posited a scenario in which the glaciers in the Tibetan Plateau and Himalayan-Hindu Kush ranges — which reliably deliver fresh water into China, the Mekong Delta, Myanmar, Bangladesh, India and Pakistan — would disappear.
“A serious shortage of fresh water brings famine — starving people are a very serious security problem. The question then becomes ‘what will happen if starving people on the rim of Asia are looking for a new home?’” he said.
“Historical evidence suggests that under such circumstances, mass migration of these people will occur. It follows that several tens of millions of people might seek better fortunes in Australia and possibly New Zealand,” he said.
“Most other options for settlement in our region would already have high population densities. Our security forces, and all arms of government, would be overwhelmed in such a scenario,” he said.
The defense force has been examining the potential insecurities caused by climate change for a decade.
Within the force, there are serious concerns over the vulnerability of military bases to climate effects and the military’s reliance on fossil fuels.
However, Barrie said political action lagged far behind and Australia’s hyper-politicized debate over climate had hampered decisive government action.
“Our current posture is a manifest failure of leadership,” he said.
Scientists at the Australian Research Council Centre for Climate Extremes, led by Andy Pitman from the University of New South Wales (UNSW), said in their submission that climate scientists could help the nation prepare for these sorts of threats, but that investments in the required work was not occurring.
Many assessments of the threats to national security posed by climate change might be an underestimation, they said, calling for a “high-level task force to examine risks associated with climate change and national security.”
“Most assessments linking climate change with climate risk have assumed changes are well described by the average,” they said, adding that this needed to be “urgently modified.”
Focusing on average temperature rise masks more serious changes that are to occur in relation to extreme events and “compound events,” they said.
“We do not know where or when extreme events will hit, which regions will become less vulnerable and which regions will suddenly emerge to be vulnerable,” they said, adding that those problems could be solved, but that Australia was not devoting enough research to the issue.
They also said that while infrastructure and systems are often built to be resilient against isolated events — such as sea-level rise or a storm — that design often assumes they will happen in isolation, but if they occur together, they could be “catastrophic.”
Again, the scientists said Australia was not focusing on the topic and added that the US was examining compound events including the co-occurrence of droughts and heatwaves.
“Australia lags behind the US and some European countries in examining, assessing and responding to climate-change risks in terms of national security,” they said.
“Vulnerabilities associated with national security and climate change are already increasing and exist now. These are not ‘future issues’ that can be left for a decade before strategies are considered. The creation of a high-level task force to examine risks associated with climate change and national security is urgent and overdue,” they said.
UNSW Kaldor Centre for International Refugee Law director Jane McAdam said that climate change functions as a “threat amplifier” that magnifies risk and exacerbates existing crises.
“Disasters become disasters on steroids: more frequent and more intense. Climate change is also a process. Slow-onset impacts such as sea-level rise or desertification take place over time, resulting in a gradual deterioration of living conditions that ultimately renders land uninhabitable,” she said.
However, she said the prospect of massive, sudden international migration was highly unlikely and focused on the wrong people.
“Reasoned, empirically grounded analysis has too often been overshadowed by alarmist and ill-informed assumptions about the numbers of people on the move and the nature of that movement. As a result, the security analysis has been flipped away from the needs of the most vulnerable communities to instead focus on the national security of developed states, premised on the flawed notion that they will be inundated by people fleeing the impacts of climate change,” she said.
McAdam said most displacement and migration would occur within countries, not across national borders.
“Longer-term movement will generally be gradual rather than sudden, and movement that is sudden — for instance, in the aftermath of a disaster — will often require temporary relief rather than permanent migration,” she said.
“There is scant evidence to justify claims that there will be mass outflows of people across international borders which will threaten international, regional or national security, or generate new risks of Islamic terrorism or fundamentalism,” she said.
McAdam said internal displacement could generate low-level social tensions and potential conflict over key resources such as land, housing, food, water and employment.
The parliamentary inquiry has also heard that climate change has already contributed to and worsened conflicts across the world, including in Mali, Yemen, and the Arab Spring and civil war in Syria from 2011.
The International Committee of the Red Cross said the destruction of the natural environment or access to scarce resources was often used as a weapon of war.
“In armed conflict, the natural resources on which people rely are often attacked in contravention of IHL [international humanitarian law] provisions,” the Red Cross said.
“This can take the form of theft or killing of livestock, theft of land, drainage or poisoning of water resources, destruction of places of trade and livelihood. Removing the basis of communities’ resilience and capacity to adapt to changing weather conditions imperils their survival and contributes to displacement and poverty,” it added.
Could Asia be on the verge of a new wave of nuclear proliferation? A look back at the early history of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), which recently celebrated its 75th anniversary, illuminates some reasons for concern in the Indo-Pacific today. US Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin recently described NATO as “the most powerful and successful alliance in history,” but the organization’s early years were not without challenges. At its inception, the signing of the North Atlantic Treaty marked a sea change in American strategic thinking. The United States had been intent on withdrawing from Europe in the years following
My wife and I spent the week in the interior of Taiwan where Shuyuan spent her childhood. In that town there is a street that functions as an open farmer’s market. Walk along that street, as Shuyuan did yesterday, and it is next to impossible to come home empty-handed. Some mangoes that looked vaguely like others we had seen around here ended up on our table. Shuyuan told how she had bought them from a little old farmer woman from the countryside who said the mangoes were from a very old tree she had on her property. The big surprise
The issue of China’s overcapacity has drawn greater global attention recently, with US Secretary of the Treasury Janet Yellen urging Beijing to address its excess production in key industries during her visit to China last week. Meanwhile in Brussels, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen last week said that Europe must have a tough talk with China on its perceived overcapacity and unfair trade practices. The remarks by Yellen and Von der Leyen come as China’s economy is undergoing a painful transition. Beijing is trying to steer the world’s second-largest economy out of a COVID-19 slump, the property crisis and
Former president Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) trip to China provides a pertinent reminder of why Taiwanese protested so vociferously against attempts to force through the cross-strait service trade agreement in 2014 and why, since Ma’s presidential election win in 2012, they have not voted in another Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) candidate. While the nation narrowly avoided tragedy — the treaty would have put Taiwan on the path toward the demobilization of its democracy, which Courtney Donovan Smith wrote about in the Taipei Times in “With the Sunflower movement Taiwan dodged a bullet” — Ma’s political swansong in China, which included fawning dithyrambs