A recent outbreak of meningococcal disease at an army base in northern Taiwan has resulted in the death of a soldier.
Due to the fatality, the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) has taken preventive measures, providing antibiotics and monitoring the situation.
Outbreaks of infectious disease in the military are always taken extremely seriously by public health professionals around the world.
The most notable case was the 1918 influenza A (H1N1) pandemic, commonly known as the Spanish flu.
From September to November 1918, as World War I raged and the US military was locked in a bitter military campaign, a novel influenza virus began to rapidly spread among military personnel. Influenza-associated pneumonia sickened 20 to 40 percent of US Army and Navy personnel.
The rapidly accumulating number of influenza cases and high fatality rate severely crippled the US military’s combat ability. By the end of the war, influenza and pneumonia had killed more US soldiers and sailors during the pandemic than those who had died on the battlefield.
For this reason, the US military places a strong emphasis on monitoring of infectious diseases.
In addition, the transmission, prevention and control measures of influenza have to be viewed from a global perspective.
Throughout history, infectious diseases have often been accompanied by wars, such as typhus, which plagued Napoleon’s armies, or typhoid fever, which hampered the US Army during the 1898 Spanish-American War.
Fortunately, by 1918, due to the advent of modern bacteriology, antibiotics and the development of vaccines for cholera, typhoid, yellow fever, trench fever and other infectious diseases — previously commonplace among militaries — had become fairly rare.
For this reason, the commander of the US forces during World War I did not expect that a novel influenza virus with a higher transmission rate and greater virulence would quickly affect his troops.
In other words, the military needs to train officers how to prevent and defend against the emergence of infectious diseases.
Unfortunately, soldiers are a high-risk group for an outbreak of an emerging infectious disease due to the high population density of military bases, the close proximity in which military personnel train and live, the intensity of field operations, the pressure of combat and the frequent lack of sleep.
In addition to influenza, military garrisons have previously been the vector of acute respiratory infections, adenoviral conjunctivitis, food and water-borne infectious diseases and arthropod-borne infectious diseases.
Academics at the National Defense Medical College in Japan have carried out research on infectious diseases in the military.
They found that new military recruits were more likely to catch respiratory infections from multiple sources, viral hepatitis or even rubella (German measles) while on leave.
Interaction between the military and outside communities will often result in a subsequent wave of transmission.
During the 2003 SARS outbreak, although only a single military guard was infected, epidemiological specialists investigating the source of the infection still ran into a myriad of problems.
This is why military medical colleges in Taiwan must cultivate their own specialists trained in infectious disease epidemiology and preventive measures in order to meet the specialist public health needs of the military and any urgent needs during an epidemic.
These experts should not simply be focused on adding academic qualifications to their names, but must have accumulated sufficient experience in frontline field epidemiology and be truly dedicated to public service.
In addition, they must be capable of implementing planning, including the establishment of a responsive infectious diseases surveillance system, and must also be familiar with the practical approaches and effectiveness of different prevention strategies.
Infectious diseases within militaries can originate in barracks or during deployment; or new pathogens in developing countries could be transferred through interaction with local communities. Bioterrorism is also a potential threat.
Although in recent years the military has enlisted the help of the CDC to investigate outbreaks of infectious diseases, it should still have a long-term vision to educate military officers regarding infectious disease epidemiology.
This is especially the case for scientific research, where the military should be more intently focused on infectious diseases that pose greater threats to public health.
For example, the US military has conducted research into malaria for many years, while China’s military hospitals carried out long-term research into hemorrhagic fever with renal syndrome caused by hantaviruses.
There is a pressing need for Taiwan’s military to collaborate with academic research institutions to develop new ideas and simple procedures that will increase the effectiveness of the nation’s response when the next epidemic surfaces.
King Chwan-chuen is a professor and an infectious disease epidemiologist in the College of Public Health’s Institute of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine at National Taiwan University.
Translated by Edward Jones
Saudi Arabian largesse is flooding Egypt’s cultural scene, but the reception is mixed. Some welcome new “cooperation” between two regional powerhouses, while others fear a hostile takeover by Riyadh. In Cairo, historically the cultural capital of the Arab world, Egyptian Minister of Culture Nevine al-Kilany recently hosted Saudi Arabian General Entertainment Authority chairman Turki al-Sheikh. The deep-pocketed al-Sheikh has emerged as a Medici-like patron for Egypt’s cultural elite, courted by Cairo’s top talent to produce a slew of forthcoming films. A new three-way agreement between al-Sheikh, Kilany and United Media Services — a multi-media conglomerate linked to state intelligence that owns much of
The US and other countries should take concrete steps to confront the threats from Beijing to avoid war, US Representative Mario Diaz-Balart said in an interview with Voice of America on March 13. The US should use “every diplomatic economic tool at our disposal to treat China as what it is... to avoid war,” Diaz-Balart said. Giving an example of what the US could do, he said that it has to be more aggressive in its military sales to Taiwan. Actions by cross-party US lawmakers in the past few years such as meeting with Taiwanese officials in Washington and Taipei, and
Denmark’s “one China” policy more and more resembles Beijing’s “one China” principle. At least, this is how things appear. In recent interactions with the Danish state, such as applying for residency permits, a Taiwanese’s nationality would be listed as “China.” That designation occurs for a Taiwanese student coming to Denmark or a Danish citizen arriving in Denmark with, for example, their Taiwanese partner. Details of this were published on Sunday in an article in the Danish daily Berlingske written by Alexander Sjoberg and Tobias Reinwald. The pretext for this new practice is that Denmark does not recognize Taiwan as a state under
The Republic of China (ROC) on Taiwan has no official diplomatic allies in the EU. With the exception of the Vatican, it has no official allies in Europe at all. This does not prevent the ROC — Taiwan — from having close relations with EU member states and other European countries. The exact nature of the relationship does bear revisiting, if only to clarify what is a very complicated and sensitive idea, the details of which leave considerable room for misunderstanding, misrepresentation and disagreement. Only this week, President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) received members of the European Parliament’s Delegation for Relations