UK Home Secretary Amber Rudd is to urge social media companies to do more to remove online terrorist content during a series of meetings with tech giants including Twitter and Facebook, after a sharp increase in the number of plots foiled in the UK.
The home secretary is to warn that extremists have exploited Web platforms as way of spreading their “hateful messages” when she attends the Global Internet Forum to Counter Terrorism in Silicon Valley.
British Prime Minister Theresa May had previously warned that the fight against the Islamic State (IS) was shifting from the “battlefield to the Internet” when she attended the G7 meeting in Sicily in the wake of the Manchester terror attack. World leaders called on Internet service providers to “substantially increase” their efforts to crackdown on extremist content.
Illustration: Tania Chou
“The responsibility for tackling this threat at every level lies with both governments and with industry. We have a shared interest: we want to protect our citizens and keep the free and open Internet we all love,” Rudd is expected to tell the Internet providers.
She is to claim that the forum, which was created by Facebook, Microsoft, Twitter and YouTube, marks an opportunity to start “turning the tide” on the issue. It comes after a 21-year-old from Slough, Taha Hussain, was found guilty of encouraging people to instigate, prepare or commit acts of terror including through online content.
After he was arrested, disturbing photographs were found on his phone alongside a YouTube channel that he had created, which claimed that no one should “feel sorry” for the deaths of non-Muslims and the “wrong kind” of Muslims.
His YouTube channel broadcast images of militants in battle, firing a range of weapons and blowing up vehicles and buildings, and included the black flag associated with the IS. Detectives also discovered that Hussain had sent a number of videos containing extremist propaganda via WhatsApp.
“Extremist posts like the ones Hussain posted and shared have the power to influence other people and particularly those who may be young and impressionable or vulnerable for a variety of reasons,” said detective chief superintendent Kath Barnes, head of Counter Terrorism Policing South East.
“This could lead to those influenced individuals committing acts of terror, which clearly has devastating effects on communities, the individual and their family and friends,” she said.
Rudd met tech companies after Khalid Masood drove a car into tourists gathered on Westminster Bridge and then murdered police constable Keith Palmer at the gates of parliament before being shot dead.
After the meeting, she said her starting point was that people who want to do harm should not be able to use the Internet or social media to further their cause.
“I want to make sure we are doing everything we can to stop this,” she said, warning that terrorist propaganda online was a “very real and evolving threat.”
The UK government was cited by tech companies as they moved toward creating the forum.
Monika Bickert, director of global policy management at Facebook, and Brian Fishman, the company’s counterterrorism policy manager, said they had been learning a lot through briefings from agencies in different countries about the IS and al-Qaeda propaganda mechanisms.
The companies, which have previously come under intense criticism for not taking the issue seriously enough, said the forum would aim to create new technological solutions that could help remove terrorist content.
They would also commission research to help them reach policy decisions, and work with counterterrorism experts, as well as governments, civil society groups and academics. The largest companies have promised to work with smaller outfits to support their efforts.
The British prime minister chose to focus on the issue of terrorism threats both at the G7 in Sicily, when she spoke about social media companies, and in the G20 in Hamburg, when she spoke about how to disrupt the financing of extremist groups.
That followed a series of terror attacks in the UK in quick succession, including the Westminster attack, the Manchester bombing in which 22 people were killed, and the London Bridge attacks that resulted in eight deaths and 48 being injured.
The UK Home Office admitted that there had been a sharp increase in the number of terror attacks foiled by the British security agencies, with five plots disrupted in just two months, compared with 12 in the period from 2013 to March this year. It has been reported that MI5 is juggling about 500 active investigations at one time with 3,000 people of interest.
However, Silicon Valley is expected to strongly resist Rudd’s demands.
“They [tech companies] are under intense pressure from the EU, from the media, from advertisers and the public. But they continue to stall and do a good job on PR, but not a good job on actually implementing these changes,” Counter Extremism Project senior adviser Hany Farid said.
Farid, a computer science professor at Dartmouth College, compared the efforts on terrorism to tech firms’ slowness to take action against content promoting child abuse and exploitation in the mid-2000s.
“I’m highly skeptical of the PR efforts that we’re seeing from tech,” he said. “It is not real action. It is trying to stave off legislation both at the EU, the UK and here in the States.”
At the first forum’s first workshop on Tuesday, the tech giants are to discuss strategies to “disrupt terrorists’ ability to use the Internet,” the companies said in a joint blogpost.
The statement cited goals to share best practices and technology, conduct and fund new research and recruit other firms to join the effort.
Critics have argued that private corporations are not well equipped to tackle such a complex problem on their own.
“There’s an immediate conflict of interest, which is these companies want to make money. The way that they capture information is built around a commercial purpose. That’s really very different than trying to discern what one’s political agenda is,” University at Albany professor of public administration and policy R. Karl Rethemeyer said.
Michael Smith, a terrorism analyst, said that he hoped Rudd would “call them out for their unwillingness to enable policies which would more effectively deter exploitations of their technologies by terrorists.”
The firms have generally opposed efforts to make it easier to identify and locate users, which could lead regulators in Europe and the US to try to force them to be more proactive in the way they track people, he said.
Although the companies have pledged to share information as part of their joint counterterrorism initiative, there are also profit motives in limiting such collaboration.
“The level of competition between those platforms is intense. There’s no particular commercial reason for them to share,” Rethemeyer said.
Pressure from officials like Rudd could encourage the companies to adopt internal policy changes in an effort to pre-empt regulations and other efforts to hold them legally liable.
There are, however, growing concerns that in the process, the social media platforms will increasingly censor people and violate users’ free speech rights, Electronic Frontier Foundation staff attorney Sophia Cope said.
“The potential for overbroad takedowns is just incredibly great, particularly when you get into those gray areas of political speech, dissenting speech, religious speech, where there is room for debate,” she said.
In recent months, Facebook has repeatedly come under fire for censoring journalists and activists in the name of combating terrorism, often reversing their decisions in the wake of negative media coverage.
While some regulators have pushed for greater technical solutions to weed out terrorist propaganda, there are also worries that machine learning and artificial intelligence fail to understand the context of content and can block speech that should not be censored.
“It’s not so simple to just throwing automated technology at the problem,” Cope said. “The technology just isn’t there yet to be able to sift out what they’re trying to target from what is considered legitimate speech.”
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
The past few months have seen tremendous strides in India’s journey to develop a vibrant semiconductor and electronics ecosystem. The nation’s established prowess in information technology (IT) has earned it much-needed revenue and prestige across the globe. Now, through the convergence of engineering talent, supportive government policies, an expanding market and technologically adaptive entrepreneurship, India is striving to become part of global electronics and semiconductor supply chains. Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Vision of “Make in India” and “Design in India” has been the guiding force behind the government’s incentive schemes that span skilling, design, fabrication, assembly, testing and packaging, and
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.